Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Abraham Story: An Introduction LDS (OPEN)
Meridian Magazine ^ | E. Douglas Clark

Posted on 03/18/2009 8:09:35 AM PDT by greyfoxx39

M E R I D I A N     M A G A Z I N E

The Abraham Story: An Introduction
By E. Douglas Clark

He has been called the most pivotal and strategic man in history. Jews, Christians, and Muslims — half the planet’s population — revere him not only as forefather but as an exemplary pattern of righteousness. Jewish tradition tells that his life was a pattern also of things to come, foreshadowing what would befall his posterity through the generations.

But his significance is nothing short of universal, for pursuant to the covenant God made with him, through him and his posterity would heaven’s blessings extend to all nations — by means of the Atonement and the latter-day restoration of the Gospel and establishment of Zion. For more than three decades I have sought to become acquainted with this remarkable man. His name is Abraham.

As a senior in high school I experienced a defining moment when I opened our monthly Church magazine (then called the Era) and began reading an article by Hugh Nibley. The subject was Abraham, and I am still at a loss to adequately explain what happened, except to say that I felt absolutely compelled to learn everything I could about him. The endeavor would be not my vocation but my avocation, one that would lead me to learn biblical Hebrew, participate in the annual meetings of the Society of Biblical Literature, interact with renowned scholars, travel to the Middle East to retrace Abraham’s route, and seek every source available from around the world that illuminated his life story.

Never has there been a story quite like his. Born in an idolatrous era of incredible cruelty and gross immorality, the boy somehow sensed that society had gone gravely amiss, and he began in earnest to seek the Creator. Reflection and prayer opened the heavens, but when he sought to persuade others to abandon their evil ways, he was mocked, persecuted, imprisoned, and ultimately placed on an altar to be sacrificed. Many years later he would endure the unfathomable irony of placing his own beloved son on an altar at God’s command.

Between those two memorable events came a host of trials and triumphs, prayers and promises, hardships and heavenly visitations. And with him every step of the way was his beloved Sarah. As capable as she was beautiful, she was actually his spiritual superior in important ways. But the decisive factor in their marriage and mission was a deep and undying love that kept them going and seemed to keep them young in spirit, even after they had grown old waiting for the fulfillment of God’s promise of posterity.

That it finally took miraculous means to achieve that promise seems to point ahead to another miraculous birth by another beautiful woman, whose child would come as Son of God and descendant of Abraham. Nor was the Savior the only descendant foreshadowed in Abraham’s long and eventful life. When 14-year-old Joseph Smith knelt to pray, it was a stunning reenactment of what his forefather Abraham had also done as a young boy at the very same age. Joseph’s prayer in fact opened the door for the latter-day fulfillment of Abraham’s covenant.

It is that covenant, along with the sterling example set by Abraham, which is his true legacy. If the great Egyptian pyramids built by the pretenders to Abraham’s priesthood authority were a wonder of the ancient world, it was Abraham himself who was the greater wonder — he who spent his life not amassing fortunes nor constructing massive self-serving monuments, as he easily could have done, but selflessly building the kingdom of God and establishing Zion, and thereby shedding the blessing of God as widely as possible. No wonder the Lord commanded his us to “Do the works of Abraham.” [1] And no wonder modern prophets and apostles have reminded us to do so. In the words of President Spencer W. Kimball, “Now is the time to follow Abraham’s example.”


So where do we turn to read of Abraham’s example and learn of his works? The most widely known source telling of his life is of course the book of Genesis, where even the casual reader is struck by the sudden shift of emphasis at the end of chapter 11. As noted by German scholar Gerhard von Rad, “All at once and precipitously the universal field of vision narrows; world and humanity... are submerged, and all interest is concentrated upon a single man.” [2]

The story of salvation has suddenly become the story of this one man, Abraham, for in him and his posterity are all nations to be blessed. From that point forward the biblical account is the narrative of how that blessing unfolds, beginning with some twelve chapters showing us an unprecedented close-up of a biblical character — his life, conversations, revelations, travels, and even domestic doings. His wife Sarah is the first woman after Eve to be even named in the Bible, and gets far more press than any woman before her.

Even so, the Genesis account of Abraham and Sarah is at times so terse as to be, as Erich Auerbach describes, “fraught with background.” [3] Some passages can be downright perplexing, seemingly incongruent or nearly incomprehensible. For example, how is it that the steadfastly faithful Abraham, who had been willing to leave home and kindred at God’s command, suddenly seems to lapse into dismal faithlessness in Egypt by passing his wife off as his sister?  Scholars note that he appears to be “acting completely out of character” [4] in this “puzzling” [5] and “incon­gru­ous scene” [6] that stands out as “a mélange of the credible and the unexplained.” [7]

Such incongruence in the Genesis text arises from the troubled transmission of the Hebrew bible over thousands of years, during which it “suffered from the shortcomings of man,” [8] including not only all kinds of scribal errors [9] but also, as respected scholar Michael Fishbane has shown, deliberate alterations and omissions. [10] In short, despite the wealth of information it preserves about Abraham, the book of Genesis can at times be unreliable and misleading.  

But with the restoration of the Gospel came the hope that Latter-Day Saints would receive further information about their illustrious forefather. The Book of Mormon, published in 1830, foretold that the latter-day work among a branch of Abraham’s posterity would bring them “to the knowledge of their fathers” and the covenants God had made to them. [11]

The most dramatic fulfillment of that promise came in the stunning restoration of an autobiographical Abraham account that fills in key gaps left by Genesis, including the fact that God commanded Abraham to ask Sarah to say she was Abraham’s sister. In March 1842 when Wilford Woodruff helped set the type for the publication of the first installment of the Book of Abraham, his journal entry that night marveled at the book’s “great and glorious” truths, “which are among the rich treasures that are revealed unto us in the last days.” [12]

The Book of Abraham remains one of our most important, if sadly underused, scriptural treasures, revealing precious truths about Abraham’s story and his deeds that remain a beacon for his descendants.

The genius of the book of Abraham is that interwoven through the description of… momentous events is a panorama of mankind’s divine origin and potential. As literal spirit offspring of God, we are sent into mortality to be “prove[n]… to see if [we] will do all things whatsoever the Lord [our] God shall command [us]” so that we can “have glory added upon [our] heads for ever and ever.” Parley Pratt noted that in Abraham’s record “we see… unfolded our eternal being — our existence before the world was — our high and responsible station in the councils of the Holy One, and our eternal destiny.” The book of Abraham even describes the road to that highest destiny: strictly obeying all God’s commandments; diligently seeking righteousness and peace; making and keeping sacred covenants; receiving the priesthood and sacred ordinances; building a family unit; searching the scriptures; keeping journals and records; sharing the gospel; and proving faithful in the face of opposition — all works of Abraham, who is as much a model for Latter-day Saints as he was in ages past for those aspiring to be the people of God. [13]

With the appearance of the Book of Abraham and the sure knowledge that authentic Abrahamic traditions had survived outside of the Bible, Church leaders were eager to learn more of Abraham from other emerging sources like the Book of Jasher. The Prophet Joseph briefly referred to in an article he wrote for Times and Seasons, [14] and other leaders like Brigham Young, John Taylor, and Wilford Woodruff, speaking in public, quoted the Jasher story of Abraham smashing the idols. [15]

When Franklin D. Richards, the compiler of the Pearl of Great Price, spoke in General Conference in 1892, he summarized several legends from Jasher and further mentioned the Qur’an as a source of Abrahamic material. [16] By then the Church in Salt Lake City had even reprinted the book of Jasher, making it widely available to the saints. And in the 1898 maiden volume of the Improvement Era, the Church published the first English translation of an extra-biblical account called the Apocalypse of Abraham, a text that purports to be an autobiographical writing of the patriarch and contains striking parallels to portions of the Book of Abraham.

Since then, additional ancient texts continued to emerge, slowly at first. A few were published by R. H. Charles at the beginning of the twentieth century. [17] But the pace began to accelerate with the 1947 discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls, including the Genesis Apocryphon — yet another autobiographical account of Abraham. In the following decades the emergence of yet other ancient biblical-related texts grew rapidly. Many of these claimed to have been composed originally by early biblical figures like Abraham and Enoch and even Adam, and although once used as authentic texts in early Jewish and Christianity communities, they had long since been set aside, lost, or otherwise forgotten.

Their sudden recovery from oblivion after many centuries is hailed as something of a miracle even by secular scholars. “By the strangest quirk of fate respecting literature that I know of,” wrote Samuel Sandmel in 1983, “large numbers of writings by Jews were completely lost from the transmitted Jewish heritage... Now... a door is being opened anew to treasures that are very old.” [18]

Hugh Nibley’s assessment is similar, referring to that “astonishing outpouring of ancient writings that is the peculiar blessing of our generation.” [19] Part of the blessing is the remarkable corroboration that these newly emerged writings offer to the prior latter-day revelations and texts, a phenomenon noted by no less a figure than Harold Bloom.  In one of his widely read books, the prominent Bloom, not a Latter-day Saint, called attention to Joseph Smith’s “uncanny recovery of elements in ancient Jewish theurgy that had ceased to be available either to normative Judaism or to Christianity, and that had survived only in esoteric traditions unlikely to have touched Smith directly.” [20] Such vindication of the Prophet Joseph’s work was prophesied by himself: “The world will prove Joseph Smith a true prophet by circumstantial evidence,” [21] he foretold.

But these long-lost and recently recovered ancient texts do more than corroborate.  They also offer additional detail, consistent with the restored knowledge already provided through latter-day scripture, about our illustrious forefather Abraham. Of all the saints since Abraham’s day, we are uniquely blessed to have at our disposal an expanded wealth of knowledge about him and his life.

All of which seems to me more than coincidental, for the more we learn of Abraham’s day, the more it seems a distant mirror of our own age of increasing spiritual darkness. The remedy for today’s ills is the preaching of the restored Gospel of Jesus Christ and the establishment of Zion, which we can accomplish only by doing the works of Abraham and thereby fulfilling his covenant to bless ourselves and all nations.



[1] Doctrine and Covenants 132:32.

[2] Gerhard von Rad, Genesis: A Commentary, rev. ed., The Old Testament Library (Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1972), p. 154.

[3] Erich Auerbach, Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1968), p. 12.

[4] Clyde T. Francisco, in Clifton T. Allen, ed., The Broadman Bible Commentary, vol. 1, revised (Nashville, Tennessee: Broadman Press, 1973 [1969]), p. 157.

[5] Rabbi Joseph Telushkin, Biblical Literacy: The Most Important People, Events, and Ideas of the Hebrew Bible (New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc., 1997), p. 25; Eugene F. Roop, Genesis, Believers Church Bible Commentary (Scottdale, Pennsylvania: Herald Press, 1987), p. 104.

[6] Ronald Youngblood, Faith of Our Fathers, A Bible Commentary for Laymen (Glendale, California: G/L Publications, 1976), p. 22.

[7] Bruce Vawter, On Genesis: A New Reading (Garden City, New York: Doubleday & Company, 1977), p. 182.

[8] Peter R. Ackroyd, et al. The Cambridge History of the Bible (3 vols; Cambridge:  Cambridge Press, 1963‑1970) 1:161.

[9] Ernst Wurthwein, The Text of the Old Testament:  An Introduction to the Biblia Hebraica (Grand Rapids:  Eerdmans, 1979), pp.105-111.

[10] Michael Fishbane, Biblical Interpretation in Ancient Israel (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988), pp. 81-83.

[11] 2 Nephi 3:7, 12.

[12] Scott G. Kenney, ed. Wilford Woodruff’s Journal: 1833–1893 Typescript (9 vols.; Midvale, Utah: Signature Books, 1983) 2:159.

[13] E. Douglas Clark, in Hugh Nibley, Abraham in Egypt, 2nd ed., The Collected Works of Hugh Nibley, vol. 14 (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Company, and Provo, Utah: Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies at Brigham Young University, 2000), p. xxi (foreword).

[14] Richard C. Galbraith and Joseph Fielding Smith, eds., Scriptural Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Company, 1993), p. 293, quoting “Persecution of the Prophets” in Times and Seasons 3:902, September 1, 1842.

[15] Journal of Discourses 9:290 and 11:118 (Brigham Young, on both occasions as President of the Church); 14:359 and 22:307 (John Taylor, on the latter occasion as President of the Church); 11:244 (Wilford Woodruff).

[16] Brian H. Stuy, ed., Collected Discourses Delivered by President Wilford Woodruff, His Two Counselors, the Twelve Apostles, and Other (B. H. S. Publishing, 1987–1992) 3:140–141.

[17] R. H. Charles, The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament Pseudepigrapha (2 vols.; Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1913 [1979 reprint]).

[18] Samuel Sandmel, in “Foreword for Jews,” in James H. Charlesworth ed., The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha (2 vols.; Garden City, New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1983–1985) 1:xi, xiii.

[19] Hugh Nibley, Enoch the Prophet, The Collected Works of Hugh Nibley, vol. 2 (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, and Provo, Utah: Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies at Brigham Young University, 1986), p. 95.

[20] Harold Bloom, The American Religion: The Emergence of the Post-Christian Nation (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1992), p. 101.

[21] Richard C. Galbraith and Joseph Fielding Smith, eds., Scriptural Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Company, 1993), p



TOPICS: General Discusssion; Theology
KEYWORDS: deadseascrolls; lds; mormon
This is an article from LDS sources, in a thread on the Book of Abraham that is open to general discussion.

Open threads are a town square. Antagonism though not encouraged, should be expected

Posters may argue for or against beliefs of any kind. They may tear down other’s beliefs. They may ridicule.

On all threads, but particularly “open” threads, posters must never “make it personal.” Reading minds and attributing motives are forms of “making it personal.” Making a thread “about” another Freeper is “making it personal.”

When in doubt, review your use of the pronoun “you” before hitting “enter.”

Like the Smoky Backroom, the conversation may be offensive to some.

Thin-skinned posters will be booted from “open” threads because in the town square, they are the disrupters.

http://www.freerepublic.com/~religionmoderator/

 

An excellent essay on the Book of Abraham is found here:

The Facts on the Book of Abraham (EWF)

1 posted on 03/18/2009 8:09:35 AM PDT by greyfoxx39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: colorcountry; Colofornian; Elsie; FastCoyote; svcw; Zakeet; SkyPilot; rightazrain; ...

Ping


2 posted on 03/18/2009 8:10:49 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Recession-Your neighbor loses his job, Depression-you lost your job, Recovery-Obama loses HIS job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
Let us not forget that Abraham tried to give his wife, Sarah, away at least two times saying "She is my Sister", so saying he is an example of righteousness should be used with caution least someone do the same.

Better to say he was a great example of faith, since He followed God in offering up his only Son Isaac on an altar. He followed God in that he went out "Not knowing where he was going". And it is of him, that we say the phrase "The Righteous will live by faith"

3 posted on 03/18/2009 8:16:39 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
The Book of Abraham remains one of our most important, if sadly underused, scriptural treasures, revealing precious truths about Abraham’s story and his deeds that remain a beacon for his descendants.

Probably because it is by far the most academically discredited translation by smith. For example:
Egyptologist's Interpretation of Facsimile 1 Statements made by Richard A. Parker, Wilbour Professor of Egyptology and Chairman of the Department of Egyptology at Brown University in the Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, Vol. 3, no. 2, Summer 1968, p. 86. :

"This is a well-known scene from the Osiris mysteries, with Anubis, the jackal-headed god, on the left ministering to the dead Osiris on the bier. The penciled restoration is incorrect. Anubis should be jackal-headed. The left arm of Osiris is in reality lying at his side under him. The apparent upper hand is part of the wing of a second bird which is hovering over the erect phallus of Osiris (now broken away). The second bird is Isis and she is magically impregnated by the dead Osiris and then later gives birth to Horus who avenges his father and takes over his inheritance. The complete bird represents Nephthys, sister to Osiris and Isis. Beneath the bier are the four canopic jars with heads representive of the four sons of Horus, human-headed Imseti, baboon-headed Hapy, jackal-headed Duamutef and falcon-headed Kebehsenuf. The hieroglyphs refer to burial, etc. ...."

Statements made by Klaus Baer, Associate Professor of Egyptology at the University of Chicago's Oriental Institute in the Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, Autumn 1968, pp. 118-119 :

"The vignette on P. JS I is unusual, but parallels exist on the walls of the Ptolemaic temple of Egypt, the closest being the scenes in the Osiris chapels on the roof of the Temple of Dendera. The vignette shows the resurrection of Osiris (who is also the deceased owner of the papyrus) and the conception of Horus. Osiris (2) is represented as a man on a lion-couch (4) attended by Anubis (3), the jackal-headed god who embalmed the dead and thereby assured their resurrection and existence in the hereafter. Below the couch are the canopic jars for the embalmed internal organs. The lids are the four sons of Horus, from the left to right Imset (8), Hapi (7), Qebeh-senuwef (6), and Duwa-mutef (5), who protect the liver, lungs, intestines, and stomach, respectively. At the head of the couch is a small offering stand (10) with a jug and some flowers on it and two larger vases on the ground beside it. The ba of Osiris (1) is hovering above his head.

The versions of Osiris myth differ in telling how Seth disposed of Osiris after murdering him, but he was commonly believed to have cut Osiris into small pieces, which he scattered into the Nile, leaving Isis the task of fishing out and assembling the parts of her brother and husband so that he could be resurrected and beget Horus. In this she was helped by Horus in the shape of a crocodile, who is represented in the water (the zigzags) below the vignette (9). Below that is a decorative pattern derived from the niched facade of a protohistoric Egyptian palace.

There are some problems about restoring the missing parts of the body of Osiris. He was almost certainly represented as ithuphallic, ready to beget Horus, as in many of the other scenes at Dendera. I know of no representations of Osiris on a couch with both hands in front of his face. One would expect only one hand in front of his face, while the other was either shown below the body (impossible in P. JS I) or grasping the phallus. It the latter case it would be hard to avoid the suggestion of Professor Richard A. Parker that what looks like the upper hand of Osiris is actually the wingtip of a representation of Isis as a falcon hovering in the act of copulation."

4 posted on 03/18/2009 8:28:30 AM PDT by Godzilla (If the first step in an argument is wrong everything that follows is wrong. ~C.S. Lewis, The Problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sr4402

saying he is an example of righteousness should be used with caution least someone do the same.
_________________________________________

Best you tell God that...

For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness. Romans 4:3

We werent the ones who said that...

Abraham is listed in the Hall of Faith... (Hebrews 11:8-12)

Jesus mentioned Abraham as having faith to believe in His future coming...(John 8:56)

Abraham is given as the example of a man with faith in God...

and I for one throw caution to the winds in “aying he is an example of righteousness” that God Hiomself has given us...


5 posted on 03/18/2009 8:32:16 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

If a voice in your head tells you to kill your children, it probably ain’t God speaking.


6 posted on 03/18/2009 8:38:35 AM PDT by Lexington Green (I hope he fails...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

You Missed the Point. Abraham sinned against his wife and that should not be used as an Example of Righteousness. Abrahams believe was “counted to Him” as Righteousness, the distinction needs to be observed.


7 posted on 03/18/2009 8:48:03 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sr4402

You Missed the Point
_____________________________________

You Missed the Point

God said that Abraham IS “an Example of Righteousness”

Yes, Abraham sinned...

(Where are you hiding when we have wars in here about that)

And we ended up with Ishmael and his descendants.....

and twice innocent people suffered due to his lies and Sarah’s lies...She went along...

But STILL God said Abraham was counted as RIGHTEOUS (Romans 4:3)


8 posted on 03/18/2009 8:56:52 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sr4402

Abraham sinned against his wife and that should not be used as an Example of Righteousness.
__________________________________________________

Joe Smith sinned against his wife with more than 30 women and not only is he “used as an Example of Righteousness” but a whole new religion has been based on his sin...


9 posted on 03/18/2009 8:59:25 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

"A BALANCED, professionally produced approach to a sensitive issue in Mormon history.” Stan Larson, Ph.D., Marriott Library, University of Utah

THE LOST BOOK OF ABRAHAM documentary not only gets the facts right with regard to this story, but tells this fascinating tale in an utterly captivating and professional way. The producers also obviously took tremendous care in writing the script so as not to unduly offend the LDS people. I just cannot recommend this documentary more highly.” Craig J. Hazen, Ph.D., Biola University

You can see an award winning documentary on the Book of Abraham by clicking HERE.

You can see more reviews on the film by clicking HERE.

10 posted on 03/18/2009 8:59:37 AM PDT by Zakeet (Grow your own dope. Plant a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
According to customs then she was considered his sister, (in actuality she was his half sister). Back then you could also marry your half sister, cousin or neice as well. IOW, if Abrham lied he did it by ommission as technically she was his sister. He just failed to mention he has married his half sister.

Abraham's family tree

Genesis 20:12 And moreover she is indeed my sister, the daughter of my father, but not the daughter of my mother; and so she became my wife.

Wiki

Sarai and Pharaoh See also: Wife-sister narratives in Genesis Forced by a famine to seek refuge in Egypt (Genesis 12:10-20), and expressing fear that his wife's beauty should arouse evil designs of the Egyptians and thus endanger his own safety, Abram asks Sarai to pretend that she is his sister, to an unnamed Pharaoh of Egypt. They later make the same claim to Abimelech, the Philistine king of Gerar (Genesis 20). In the latter case, Abram explains that Sarai is only his half-sister, on his father's side (Genesis 20:12).[7]

Indeed, the kinship pattern of the Semitic chiefs listed in Genesis followed an established protocol that involved betrothal to half-sisters, so Abram may not have lied when he said that Sarai was his sister.[citation needed] Like Abram, many ancient Semites were nomads, and it was customary for the daughter-in-law to be officially adopted as a full daughter in case her husband died while she was traveling with his family. According to Genesis 12:5, Sarai accompanied her husband to the land of Canaan, which would have put her in this same position as suggested in the ancient tablets of Mari (an ancient Semite city of Abram's time) if she was not related to Abram — at the very least she would have parted from her mother's half of her family.

In any case, the deception did not save her from the Pharaoh. The latter took her into the royal harem and enriched Abram with herds and servants. But Yahweh "plagued Pharaoh and his house with great plagues" (Genesis 12:17). Pharaoh is next shown questioning Abram, and somehow cognizant of the fact that Sarai was Abram's wife. Pharaoh reunited the couple and sent them away with all of Abram's property (Genesis 12:20).

11 posted on 03/18/2009 2:49:10 PM PDT by Rameumptom (Gen X= they killed 1 in 4 of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Relevant links

http://en.fairmormon.org/Book_of_Abraham/Papyri
http://en.fairmormon.org/Book_of_Abraham/Hits
http://en.fairmormon.org/Book_of_Abraham/Papyri/Long_article
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9N56ziFVFU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nl7G1YrDp1Q
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUbp04NFCl0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IQxsZx2iS8


12 posted on 03/18/2009 6:44:31 PM PDT by restornu (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rameumptom
According to customs then she was considered his sister, (in actuality she was his half sister). Back then you could also marry your half sister, cousin or niece as well. IOW, if Abraham lied he did it by omission as technically she was his sister. He just failed to mention he has married his half sister.

Sorry, it doesn't wash with me. It is one thing to say something, it is another to give you wife over to adultery - to let your wife go to another without speaking up.

No it is not Abraham's works which saved Him, but his faith which reckoned him as righteousness before God. It was that faith, also evident in offering up Isaac just as God would do for his Only Begotten Son many years laters on a horribly splintered "Tree" and not be substituted with a Ram.

No Abraham was just like us, with failings and sin, but what is exemplary is despite all this, is his faith.

The same is true of David. How can God say "He was a man after God's on Heart" and yet go after Bathsheba by killing Uriah. No it is not the sin, but the example of faith shown in his repentance.

13 posted on 03/19/2009 11:37:59 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Excellent.

14 posted on 03/21/2009 4:43:47 PM PDT by delacoert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson