A report on the "very dull and insensible" movie, "The Golden Compass" (from a catholic viewer)

Nick Milne, a reader of this blog who is in graduate school (studying English) at the University of Western Ontario, saw an advanced screening of "The Golden Compass" and sent the following (thanks, Nick!):

1. The name, about which much has been said.
2. One of its regional offices (in Norway, or nearby) has, painted on its exterior, icons of an Eastern style. However, no symbols are associated with the Magisterium apart from an ornate letter M. That is, no symbolic examples of the organization's ethos or origins are displayed.
3. It is concerned greatly with "heresy," and the suppression of same. The Magisterium equates heresy with "freethinking;" other characters equate heresy with truth. The penalty for heresy is evidently death.
4. It wants to suppress some scientific research so that "centuries of teaching" are not overthrown; however, it conducts research of its own in other areas, though in cruel and inhumane ways.
5. Its agents, at least at one level of the hierarchy, are called "friars."
6. Its agents declare that the Magisterium has universal authority; no mention is made of where this authority comes from or why, even to attack such claims.
7. Some of the guards at the Magisterium's seat of power, evidently in London, wear caps reminiscent of those worn by fascist soldiers during the Spanish civil war; see the recent 'Pan's Labyrinth' for examples of this. The caps are strange-looking and distinctive.
8. Except for the the highest echelons of the Magisterium's hierarchy, there is nothing especially clerical about its agents' appearance, and even then its leaders are clad in generic robes and finery rather than specifically clerical garb.
9. It is conducting experiments aimed towards separating children from their souls. Why the Magisterium wants to do this is never convincingly explained, though much reference is made to "the dust," which is evidently some sort of remnant of the Fall that took place in the film's world's distant past. This, too, is hardly explained, and, given both of these elements' importance to the thrust of the story, the functional silence regarding their significance is irritating. In any event, it is suggested (vaguely) that separating children from their souls may be the way to keep them from the effects of the Fall; one evil and untrustworthy character describes the process as "just a little cut." An evocation of covenantal circumcision seems possible.
10. There is no sense whatever of the interior life of the Magisterium. It does nothing beyond pursuing the protagonist and being infamous. We have no idea what's at the heart of it, what its origins are, what the basis of its claimed authority is, what its actual place in the world is, etc. There is no mention of God, even in passing. Nobody prays. Nobody preaches. One of the friars says "mirabile dictu" at one point, but that's about it. In broad terms it is suggested (mostly sarcastically or by characters who are clearly editorializing in some way, for good or ill) that the Magisterium exists alternately to take care of those who don't know how to take care of themselves, or to tell everyone what to do.
11. It is suggested near the end of the film that the Magisterium is gearing up to somehow thwart free will.

As for the rest of the film:

1. The human soul is externalized in the form of an animal companion called a "daemon." These animals can talk, their well-being is tied to that of their host (each feels blows delivered to the other, for example), and they can interact with the world around them in the manner of regular animals. They can also fight each other, with grave results to their hosts.
2. The soul dissipates and vanishes on death; this process is depicted through the daemon bursting into flames and disintegrating. While this does not necessarily demand that the soul is obliviated, it is certainly strongly suggested.
3. Children's daemons can change shape (the protagonist's switches between a cat, a bird, and other types of animals as the forms become tactically useful), but adults' can not. This is dimly connected to both the dust and the Fall, but in ways never even slightly explained.
4. A character named Lord Azrael posits the existence of other universes and hopes to travel to one; this is considered heretical.
5. The Fall that is vaguely alluded-to evidently took place because someone defied Authority (the word is uttered in such a manner that there is little doubt of it being capitalized). As with the Magisterium, no hint is given as to who did the defying, why, when, etc.
6. There is a renegade priest, a friend of the forces fighting the Magisterium. Whether he is or was a part of that Magisterium is never mentioned, nor whether he is perhaps a cleric in some competing organization. He does seem to have a vow of celibacy, however. He performs no priestly or even vaguely religious functions whatever. He and the chief witch (see below) were once lovers.
7. The protagonist seems proud of the fact that she skips her metaphysics class, or at least is obstinate in seeing it as unimportant.
8. A university refuses to negate "centuries of tolerance and free inquiry" by bowing to the Magisterium's demands that Azrael's world-hopping expedition be shut down.
9. An academic declares that "the secrets at the heart of things elude scholars and--authorities." The light pause before "authorities" is likely meant to evoke the Magisterium's claimed authority.
10. There are witches in the form of pale flying ladies in flowing dresses who fire off arrows with considerable skill. Their apparent leader is a figure of great wisdom and strength who hints at a prophecy concerning the protagonist. They have daemons as well, but theirs are not bound to them in the same manner as are those of the human characters, and may roam about as they will.
11. There is a race of talking, armoured bears, and their lack of daemons of their own is a matter of some significance. Whether they lack souls in general or only external ones is not mentioned. The tyrannical usurper bear king wants a daemon desperately, but does not say that he wants a soul. For what that's worth.
12. A cowboy in an airship (it's that kind of film) declares, when informed that the protagonist is destined to be the deciding factor in the war to come, that he "ain't heard rumour o' any war." This is more allusive than strictly religious, but there it is.

This, then, is the substance of it. The film is fitfully exciting (a battle between two bears is especially excellent), well-acted and lush in its visuals. That said, though, it is largely very dull and insensible, marred heavily by too many plot points contingent upon information that likely won't be revealed until much later, and the elements described above may be of an abundance and type likely to give a Christian viewer pause.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.