Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

From Operation Rescue to Operation Convert [Randall Terry now Catholic]
National Catholic registar ^ | 5/17/06 | TIM DRAKE

Posted on 05/17/2006 9:08:53 PM PDT by Full Court

font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="4" color="#990000">From Operation Rescue to Operation Convert


May 21-27, 2006
by TIM DRAKE
 

Also in the Register:

Randal Terry, CatholicRandall Terry has become Catholic.
Between 1987 and 1994, Randall Terry led Operation Rescue, the country’s largest peaceful civil disobedience movement. He now serves as president of the Society for Truth and Justice, and is running for a Florida Senate seat. One of the leading evangelical pro-life leaders in the country, Terry quietly entered the Catholic Church on Holy Thursday with his wife Andrea and three sons. Register senior writer Tim Drake spoke with Terry about his conversion at his home in Florida.

 Where are you from originally?
I grew up in upstate New York, in West Henrietta. We grew up in the country.

 Tell me about your family.
I was conceived out of wedlock in 1958. Within three months my parents were married, and I was born six months later. I’ve always had an affinity with babies born out of wedlock who are in danger of perishing. Had Roe v. Wade been the law of the land in 1958, I might not have been here, although I’m certain that my mother would have chosen life.
I have one brother who is four years younger. My parents were both career school teachers.

 What was your faith background?
I was baptized in the United Church of Christ in New York, but grew up in a nominal Christian home. We were barely Christmas and Easter Christians. From the time I was a little boy until I was 17, I was anything but devout. At times, I was a verifiable agnostic.

 How did you come to know Christ?
As a teenager, I had lived a life immersed in the rock ’n’ roll culture, away from the paths of God, but I had a real yearning in my heart to know ultimate truth and ultimate reality. That set my heart seeking after God in prayer and reading Scriptures and talking to people who were devout in their faith. On Sept. 6, 1976, I made an evangelical commitment to Christ as a 17-year-old.
In conjunction with my teenage rebellion, I was seeking to know if God existed, if heaven and hell and demons and angels existed. My prayer, journey, discussions and reading brought me to the point where I asked Christ to come into my life and be my Lord and savior. That brought an immediate change in my lifestyle, my speech, my relationships and my church attendance. I went from rarely going to church to going three times a week. I began to evangelize all of my former rock ’n’ roll buddies, many of whom became devout Christians. Some of them went into ministry as missionaries and pastors. Once I was convinced that Jesus was the Son of God and that he suffered and died for us, I was thrilled with the Good News and wanted to tell everyone that I knew — family, friends and foes.
It defined my life from that moment on. Two years later I enrolled in a Bible College in New York.

 How did you first get started in pro-life work?
While at a prayer meeting in the fall of 1983, a woman came into the meeting weeping. She said she had just seen a special on Christian television on abortion. She said, “We’ve got to pray that God ends this killing.”
Whenever I thought about abortion, I got a sick feeling in my stomach, yet my evangelical sociology did not allow me to be in the political and social battles of the day. I had very little historical and theological framework from which one could launch and sustain a socio-political movement.
I would think about abortion and pray, “Oh, God, please do something,” but wouldn’t know what to do.
Eventually, on May 1, 1984, I took a position in front of a Binghamton, N.Y., abortion business. I had no literature. I just stood there committed to talking to women who were entering, to beg for the life of their babies. From that grew Project Life — a crisis pregnancy center, and Operation Rescue.

 What led to the founding of Operation Rescue?
I met John Ryan, who was doing sit-ins in St. Louis, and my heart was stirred to participate in direct action. While sitting in jail in 1986, I had another epiphany about how to recruit masses of people. We recruited tens of thousands of people. Between 1987 and 1994, 75,000 arrests were made. That is 10 times the size of the arrests made during the years of protest for civil rights.

 How many times were you arrested?
More than 40 times, always for peaceful protest, like praying in front of an abortion business.

 When did you first take an interest in the Catholic Church?
It was during my work in Operation Rescue that I first became interested in the Roman Catholic Church. My training and experience were in evangelical Christianity with an evangelical framework theologically, but the Roman Catholic communion had a much better sociology and better stability, coupled with a phenomenal theology of suffering.
I would look at my evangelical friends, who would come and go from the pro-life movement. They would proclaim undying devotion for pro-life activism and then later disappear. Then I would look at my Roman Catholic friends who would never swerve. That had a tremendous magnetism for me.
I also found myself defending Catholics against ignorance and bigotry, and defending evangelicals against ignorance and bigotry.
What took me so long was that I was a cultural Protestant, trained in Protestant theology. I had to look at the parts of my training that were inaccurate or deficient. For the past six years, I have been in the Charismatic Episcopal Church. My conversion began with my friendships with clergy in this Church. They told me that the farther you go in Reformation theology, the more you end up in Catholicism and liturgy.

 Which theological hurdles were the most difficult for you to jump?
They boiled down to papal infallibility, Marian dogma, and purgatory. For years I have craved to be in the Catholic Church, but couldn’t figure a way to get around these hurdles. They became resolved this Lent.
On Ash Wednesday, I started a 40-day fast. I have been in conversation with a priest, Father John Mikalajunas, in Binghamton for over 20 years. To my amazement, during Lent, I sensed that it was the plan of the Holy Spirit to bring us into the Catholic Church. After some further conversations with Father Mikalajunas as well as with other evangelicals who had come into the Church, those theological issues evaporated. Once I realized the Truth, I had to go in. I couldn’t wait.

 I understand that you are awaiting word on the annulment of your first marriage. Can you tell me why you chose to be received into the Church (without being able to receive the Eucharist), before the resolution of your annulment?
This has been a journey for 18 years. I knew when I came in that I would have to deal with my annulment. I couldn’t bear not being in Rome any longer. So, I decided I would rather come in and wait to receive the Eucharist, rather than not be in the Church. I felt that I needed to come in, and that it was something I needed to do during Lent. Thus far it has been wonderful — I’m glad I didn’t wait.

 Tell me how your reception into the Church came about.
In my conversations with Father Mikalajunas, he would tell me that I belonged in Rome, and I would jokingly tell him that he would make a great Baptist preacher. I knew I was being pulled into Rome. At the beginning of Lent, he told me something that made a lightbulb go on. He said that he would receive me into the Church. He knew what I knew — he knew that I knew the dogmas of the Church. He was offering to receive us in the event that I could say, “Yes, I believe.”
I thought, “Oh my goodness,” and felt like the Holy Spirit was showing us a plan for our lives. Father Mikalajunas concurred.
Over Holy Thursday we were received and confirmed at St. John the Evangelist Catholic Church in Binghamton. Father Mikalajunas brought in two witnesses.
When I was confirmed, I had this overwhelming sense that I had just walked into a cathedral that was packed with people — namely, the heroes and martyrs and saints who had gone before us. I felt they were rejoicing and calling us on in our journey. I felt as if I was with these people.
There was a tremendous sense of joy realizing that it was the end of my ongoing struggles.

 What was your greatest fear?
That I would wake up and say there was no change in me. That has not been the case. Being in the Church has brought a wonderful sense of belonging. I am part of 2,000 years of Christian history that is glorious, that has warts, and heroes and villains, but that is nonetheless the Church founded by Jesus upon Peter.

 How do you expect your evangelical colleagues will react to news of your conversion?
My journey is so personal, and yet so public. An important part of my journey is that as a pro-life leader I have had the honor of leading tens of thousands of evangelicals and Catholics in pro-life activism. I pray that I am able to continue that leadership in both communities. We have a unity of purpose. We unite around the Apostles’ Creed and our common love of life and justice.
My mission as a man is to unite as many in the Christian community as possible to stand for the Christian ethic of life and justice as defined by our historical and common Christian faith.

 Do you anticipate that your conversion could hurt you in your Senate race in a predominantly Protestant state?
I hope it won’t. I believe that the unity of purpose that has helped me as an evangelical to work with Catholics will help me as a Catholic to work with evangelicals. My wife says that I am bilingual — I can speak both languages. What I would bring to the table as a state senator is standing up for the underdog for justice and freedom. Whether you’re Baptist or Episcopalian or Catholic, you can appreciate that.
We see that kind of working together in the example of a Presbyterian president [Ronald Reagan] working with a Polish priest [Pope John Paul II] to free Poland from communism. I am convinced that the two can work together in our common missions. If we don’t work together, we cannot win.

 



TOPICS: Activism; Apologetics; Catholic; Charismatic Christian; Current Events; Ecumenism; General Discusssion; History; Humor; Mainline Protestant; Moral Issues; Other Christian; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics; Religion & Science
KEYWORDS: catholic; conversion; gayson; hero; operationrescue; prolife; randallterry; terry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 461-464 next last
To: Alex Murphy; blue-duncan

To-manna, To-manna

It's only a day away...


201 posted on 05/19/2006 10:21:43 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (HHD: Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy; Dr. Eckleburg
"Not quite as good as a frozen Zero bar"

Ahh, I see you are an Old Testament scholar too. However, you failed to notice one of the arguments that went back and forth during that great debate on Mt. Ebal and Mt. Gerizim (from which we get that famous "tastes great-less filing debate). On Gerizim, the good guys, came the winning argument "Snickers" and from Ebal, the losing guys, came "Peresh" (which later was translated Zero bars).

Since the Snickers guys won the debate, a way was made for the soft delivery of the Snickers by an angel at night, to all the good Children of Israel (from which the myth of Santa Claus came about). Sometimes, on special occasions, they are delivered by other means but never just dropped from heaven promiscuously.

There was one episode when unripened Snickers were delivered by an apprentice on the seventh day (they used an apprentice since the union contract was very specific that full time angels could only work six days) and people got sick so it was decided to forget delivery on the seventh and deliver twice as much on the sixth by the professionals.

Now as to the barbecue, the problem was the beef and veal that was being boiled (yech). The priests were not good with the condiments until they went to school in Babylon. They had forgotten about the leeks and garlic used in Egypt to flavor food (really they associated spices with pagans or incense)and it was not until Babylon and eastern spices that they began to experiment with barbecue.

However with all the building of walls, houses and the temple and the hostile forces they had to contend with as well as earning a living since those miserable refugees refused to kick in the temple dues back in Jerusalem, barbecue was put on the back burner until the Inter Testamentary times, ala the Essenes and the Dead Sea Scrolls.

They were hermits with time on their hands and lots of beef to sacrifice and eat so they had to find different ways to serve it and thus the different flavors of the barbecue, some vinegar based, some coffee based, some molasses based, and some honey based, although they had to compete with the morticians for the honey. This is the status of the research on some of the more fragile fragments that are being translated as we speak.
202 posted on 05/19/2006 10:26:41 AM PDT by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: blue-duncan; Alex Murphy; Dr. Eckleburg

You know, if you could turn that into a script, I'd be willing to bet we could get Tom Hanks to play the lead...


203 posted on 05/19/2006 11:12:30 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (HHD: Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands; Alex Murphy; Dr. Eckleburg

"I'd be willing to bet we could get Tom Hanks to play the lead..."

I can see right away you are not an Old Testament scholar like Alex and me, or you would never have recommended a ham for an Old Testament part.


204 posted on 05/19/2006 11:27:37 AM PDT by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: blue-duncan; Alex Murphy; Dr. Eckleburg
I can see right away you are not an Old Testament scholar like Alex and me, or you would never have recommended a ham for an Old Testament part.

If you were half the scholars you thought you were, you would recognize the implications of the Nougat Covenant.

205 posted on 05/19/2006 11:32:51 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (HHD: Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: blue-duncan; Alex Murphy; Dr. Eckleburg; Corin Stormhands
Since the Snickers guys won the debate, a way was made for the soft delivery of the Snickers by an angel at night, to all the good Children of Israel (from which the myth of Santa Claus came about). Sometimes, on special occasions, they are delivered by other means but never just dropped from heaven promiscuously.

What about all the people with peanut allergies? Did God say, let them eat.... Dove?


206 posted on 05/19/2006 11:34:50 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (((172 * 3.141592653589793238462) / 180) * 10 = 30.0196631)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; Alex Murphy; Dr. Eckleburg; Corin Stormhands

"What about all the people with peanut allergies?"

I'm glad you brought up that point and I think this will also cover the heresy that arose because of the infamous "Nougat Covenant" that was slipped in unawares by silly women. If you add up the value of 666, the number of you know who, you will find it corresponds to the letters in "peanut allergy". Which means that any one not able to eat of the manna (Snickers)because of the allergy might not be a legal Child of Israel. Now this is where the heretical "Nougat Covenant" comes in. When some wolves in sheep's clothing slipped in unawares and could not partake of the sacred Snickers they palmed off as an original writing this pseudo-epigraph entitled "Nougat Covenant" which said that all those who for any reason could not partake of the sacred Snickers, for the low, low sum of two yonim, could substitute marshmellow fluff or yellow, marshmellow, chickies for the really authentic, orthodox, and thoroughly annointed, nougat, Snickers. I have to wash my hands just typing ths. See, I averted my eyes too.


207 posted on 05/19/2006 12:06:12 PM PDT by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: blue-duncan; P-Marlowe; Alex Murphy; Dr. Eckleburg

What a tower of cards you've constructed there bd.

No doubt you deny the trinitarian nature of the Three Musketeers...


208 posted on 05/19/2006 12:25:11 PM PDT by Corin Stormhands (HHD: Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands; P-Marlowe; Alex Murphy; Dr. Eckleburg

"No doubt you deny the trinitarian nature of the Three Musketeers..."

That's it, that's it. I'm ready to ping the Mod. When you can't win on the logic of the position you attack personally. I'll have you know it was not me who streamlined the bar, removing the last vestiges of the individuality of the three. I didn't erase the personality of the bar by making it appear as one bar in three modes instead of three distinct segments in one bar. This is what happens when you let people who are not grounded revise the authorized version.


209 posted on 05/19/2006 12:43:03 PM PDT by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: blue-duncan

LOLOLOL!


210 posted on 05/19/2006 12:44:50 PM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: blue-duncan; P-Marlowe; Alex Murphy; Dr. Eckleburg
That's it, that's it. I'm ready to ping the Mod.

Go right ahead. I bought a confectionary indulgence with M&Ms.

211 posted on 05/19/2006 12:45:05 PM PDT by Corin Stormhands (HHD: Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands; P-Marlowe; Alex Murphy; Dr. Eckleburg

" I bought a confectionary indulgence with M&Ms."

I see now where this is heading. You belong to the Secret Order of the M&M. Now I know why you were upset with my reference to the number 666. A little light lighteth the whole loaf. I know my scripture!


212 posted on 05/19/2006 12:51:35 PM PDT by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: blue-duncan; P-Marlowe; Alex Murphy; Dr. Eckleburg
You belong to the Secret Order of the M&M.

Ah, but your post number has betrayed you. It is well known that "2i2" is the area code of New York City birthplace of the famous Dead Sea Tootsie Roll scrolls.

213 posted on 05/19/2006 1:19:25 PM PDT by Corin Stormhands (HHD: Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands; P-Marlowe; Alex Murphy; Dr. Eckleburg

"Ah, but your post number has betrayed you"

Diversion doesn't become you. You know full well I was ready to expose the fact that the secret society you belong to published the infamous "Nougat Covenant". And I'm beginning to get that uneasy feeling that this whole Snickers and Zero bars thing is a put up deal from another secret society to cause dissension in the ranks. We haven't heard from them since they started this confusion. As you can see, Ive been learning a lot from studying old "24" segments and I'm not to sure about that "Dove" offering either. Even paranoids can have real enemies. Hmmm.


214 posted on 05/19/2006 1:35:09 PM PDT by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: blue-duncan; P-Marlowe; Alex Murphy; Dr. Eckleburg
Ive been learning a lot from studying old "24" segments...

I'm going to have to ask you to trust me on this.

215 posted on 05/19/2006 1:38:11 PM PDT by Corin Stormhands (HHD: Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands

"I'm going to have to ask you to trust me on this."

The checks in the mail, honest.

I have to sign off. My secretary and para legal have been running into my office wanting to know what I'm laughing so hard about. I have to finish some letters otherwise I can't bill for this fun.


216 posted on 05/19/2006 1:42:38 PM PDT by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: blue-duncan

Law isn't fun?

see ya


217 posted on 05/19/2006 1:48:58 PM PDT by Corin Stormhands (HHD: Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Full Court; Dr. Eckleburg; RnMomof7
Terry is as surprised as anyone by where his journey has led.

I'm not surpised. Some of you might recall that I wrote that he'd go R.C. about five years ago. It was plain as day.

Left his wife for another woman, both daughters pregnant out of wedlock, (one is now a Muslim,) one son is a homosexual.

I'm doubly not surprised. After accomplishments like this, I think he should consider a vocation in the priesthood.
218 posted on 05/19/2006 2:38:46 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998; Full Court
Circumcision was a "Jewish" thing since it was required of Jews.

The point I was making was...circumcision of an eight day old infant was not a voluntary thing. It was a requirement of God. It was to be a sign of his covenant with Abraham and his descendants......some of which were Jews.

Also, Jesus was baptized by the Baptist. He couldn't be baptized until the Baptist began his ministry.

God could have seen to it that Jesus would have been baptized as an infant. He did not, and the the fact that Jesus set his example, as an adult, speaks volumes.

There is no mention or example of infant baptism in scripture. It is a myth perpetuated by the mainstream church. "When I was a child, I spoke as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: But when I became a man, I put away childish things." [Corinthians 13:11] This verse by itself should be justification for adult baptism.

219 posted on 05/19/2006 3:19:58 PM PDT by Diego1618
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

"Snickers rot your teeth, and then your criticism will really be toothless."




Is tooth loss predetermined...like all other Calvinist beliefs? Calvin(ism) was - and remains - a sad way to relate to God.


220 posted on 05/19/2006 4:00:04 PM PDT by AlaninSA ("Beware the fury of a patient man." - John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 461-464 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson