Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: verity

>> If the choice is between using a condom or abstaining, the latter is the safest choice. On the other hand, if the choice is between using a condom or not using a condom, the former is the safest choice. <<

actually, that's the point: read post #32: there is no significant difference between wearing a condom or not, when having sex monogamously with regular marital frequency (well, if things are going well). .99^500=~0.



46 posted on 05/03/2006 9:54:36 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: dangus
"actually, that's the point: read post #32: there is no significant difference between wearing a condom or not, when having sex monogamously with regular marital frequency (well, if things are going well). .99^500=~0. "

There. I made the necessary correction.

53 posted on 05/04/2006 5:12:44 AM PDT by verity (The MSM is comprised of useless eaters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: dangus

actually, that's the point: read post #32: there is no significant difference between wearing a condom or not, when having sex monogamously with regular marital frequency (well, if things are going well). .99^500=~0.

Studies have found a difference. I think you are equating exposure with infection, which isn't what happens. Check out the source linked from post #41. To add another statistic, this study from rural Uganda of couples with either wife or husband infected, and no mention of condom use, has infection rates of 11.6 to 16 per 100 person years. Compare that to the "always use condoms" group in my previous post, with a rate of 1.14 per 100 person years.

54 posted on 05/04/2006 8:23:36 AM PDT by retMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson