Posted on 01/25/2006 6:02:30 AM PST by NYer
ROMA, January 25, 2006 – Benedict XVI made his first encyclical public today, and like all papal encyclicals it takes its name from the first words of its Latin version: “Deus Caritas Est,” God is love.
Why did he write it? Why did he choose this theme? What was his intention? Pope Joseph Ratzinger himself responds to these questions with crystalline clarity in the text reproduced below.
The pope read this text the morning of Monday, January 23, to the participants at an international meeting promoted in the Vatican by the Pontifical Council “Cor Unum.”
In reality, it is a preface to the encyclical, written by the author of the encyclical himself.
The image reproduced above is a detail of the mosaics that decorate the pope’s private chapel “Redemptoris Mater.” The mosaics were completed in 1999. The artist who created them is Marko Ivan Rupnik, a Slovenian Jesuit.
The detail depicts the Good Samaritan. In the preface to the encyclical, Benedict XVI cites him as follows:
“God's eros is love that has created man and that bends before him, as the Good Samaritan bent before the wounded man, victim of thieves, who was lying on the side of the road that went from Jerusalem to Jericho.”
Here, then, is the encyclical, on the Vatican’s website:
> “Deus Caritas Est”, English version
And this is the preface:
”Why I chose love as the theme of my first encyclical”
by Benedict XVI
The cosmic excursion in which Dante wants to involve the reader in his “Divine Comedy” ends before the everlasting light that is God himself, before that light which at the same time is the love “which moves the sun and the other stars” (Paradise XXXIII, verse 145). Light and love are but one thing. They are the primordial creative power that moves the universe.
If these words of the poet reveal the thought of Aristotle, who saw in the eros the power that moves the world, Dante's gaze, however, perceives something totally new and unimaginable for the Greek philosopher.
Eternal light not only is presented with the three circles of which he speaks with those profound verses that we know: “Eternal Light, You only dwell within Yourself, and only You know You; Self-knowing, Self-known, You love and smile upon Yourself!” (Paradise XXXIII, verses 124-126).
In reality, the perception of a human face – the face of Jesus Christ – which Dante sees in the central circle of light is even more overwhelming than this revelation of God as trinitarian circle of knowledge and love.
God, infinite light, whose incommensurable mystery had been intuited by the Greek philosopher, this God has a human face and – we can add – a human heart.
In this vision of Dante is shown, on one hand, the continuity between the Christian faith in God and the search promoted by reason and by the realm of religions; at the same time, however, in it is also appreciated the novelty that exceeds all human search, the novelty that only God himself could reveal to us: the novelty of a love that has led God to assume a human face, more than that, to assume the flesh and blood, the whole of the human being.
God's eros is not only a primordial cosmic force, it is love that has created man and that bends before him, as the Good Samaritan bent before the wounded man, victim of thieves, who was lying on the side of the road that went from Jerusalem to Jericho.
Today the word “love” is so tarnished, so spoiled and so abused, that one is almost afraid to pronounce it with one's lips.
And yet it is a primordial word, expression of the primordial reality; we cannot simply abandon it, we must take it up again, purify it and give back to it its original splendor so that it might illuminate our life and lead it on the right path.
This awareness led me to choose love as the theme of my first encyclical.
I wished to express to our time and to our existence something of what Dante audaciously recapitulated in his vision. He speaks of his “sight” that “was enriched” when looking at it, changing him interiorly (cfr. Paradise XXXIII, verses 112-114).
It is precisely this: that faith might become a vision-comprehension that transforms us. I wished to underline the centrality of faith in God, in that God who has assumed a human face and a human heart.
Faith is not a theory that one can take up or lay aside. It is something very concrete: It is the criterion that decides our lifestyle.
In an age in which hostility and greed have become superpowers, an age in which we witness the abuse of religion to the point of culminating in hatred, neutral rationality on its own is unable to protect us. We are in need of the living God who has loved us unto death.
Thus, in this encyclical, the subjects “God,” “Christ” and “love” are welded, as the central guide of the Christian faith. I wished to show the humanity of faith, of which eros forms part, man's “yes” to his corporeal nature created by God, a “yes” that in the indissoluble marriage between man and woman finds its rooting in creation.
And in it, eros is transformed into agape, love for the other that no longer seeks itself but that becomes concern for the other, willingness to sacrifice oneself for him and openness to the gift of a new human life. The Christian agape, love for one's neighbor in the following of Christ, is not something foreign, put to one side or something that even goes against the eros; on the contrary, with the sacrifice Christ made of himself for man he offered a new dimension, which has developed ever more in the history of the charitable dedication of Christians to the poor and the suffering.
A first reading of the encyclical might perhaps give the impression that it is divided in two parts, that it is not greatly related within itself: a first, theoretical part that talks about the essence of love, and a second part that addresses ecclesial charity, with charitable organizations.
However, what interested me was precisely the unity of the two topics, which can only be properly understood if they are seen as only one thing.
Above all, it was necessary to show that man is created to love and that this love, which in the first instance is manifested above all as eros between man and woman, must be transformed interiorly later into agape, in gift of self to the other to respond precisely to the authentic nature of the eros.
With this foundation, it had then to be clarified that the essence of the love of God and of one's neighbor described in the Bible is the center of Christian life, it is the fruit of faith.
Then, it was necessary to underline in a second part that the totally personal act of the agape cannot remain as something merely individual, but, on the contrary, it must also become an essential act of the Church as community: that is, an institutional form is also needed that expresses itself in the communal action of the Church.
The ecclesial organization of charity is not a form of social assistance that is superimposed by accident on the reality of the Church, an initiative that others could also take. On the contrary, it forms part of the nature of the Church.
Just as to the divine Logos corresponds the human announcement, the word of faith, so also to the agape which is God must correspond the agape of the Church, her charitable activity.
This activity, in addition to its first very concrete meaning of help to the neighbor, also communicates to others the love of God, which we ourselves have received. In a certain sense, it must make the living God visible. In the charitable organization, God and Christ must not be strange words; in fact, they indicate the original source of ecclesial charity. The strength of "Caritas" depends on the strength of faith of all its members and collaborators.
The spectacle of suffering man touches our heart. But charitable commitment has a meaning that goes well beyond mere philanthropy. God himself pushes us in our interior to alleviate misery. In this way, in a word, we take him to the suffering world.
The more we take him consciously and clearly as gift, the more effectively will our love change the world and awaken hope, a hope that goes beyond death.
Happy Feast Day! Do you know if the Vespers to close the Octave will be on EWTN?
Yes! EWTN is also running several specials to mark this feast of the Conversion of St. Paul.
SPECIAL PROGRAMMING
FEAST OF THE CONVERSION OF ST. PAUL THE APOSTLE, WITH POPE BENEDICT XVI, BASILICA OF ST. PAUL OUTSIDE THE WALLS, CELEBRATION OF VESPERS (90:00)
Wednesday January 25, 2006 11:30 AM Wednesday January 25, 2006 9:00 PM
EWTN GALLERY
PAUL: FROM TARSUS TO THE WORLD: EP. 3 (30:00) NEW
From Antioch to Derbe
Wednesday
January 25, 2006
4:00 AM
Wednesday
January 25, 2006
6:30 PM
JANUARY 25 ~ CONVERSION OF ST. PAUL
SPECIAL PROGRAMMING
SAINT PAUL IN GREECE (60:00)
An exploration of locations in modern Greece that served as the backdrops of St. Paul’s evangelism in the Acts of the Apostles.
Wednesday
January 25, 2006
5:00 PM
EWTN GALLERY
PAUL: FROM TARSUS TO THE WORLD: EP. 4 (30:00) NEWFrom Jerusalem to Philippi
Thursday
January 26, 2006
4:00 AM
Thursday
January 26, 2006
6:30 PM
,%20Vatican.jpg)
Michelangelo
Fra Angelico
Don't you think Roy Schoeman's conversion story parallels that of St. Paul. It was instantaneous and unexpected (though he wasn't struck blind :-). Sometimes God acts in extraordinary ways to grab our attention.
One of the clear bright markers that distinguish Catholics from Protestants is the answer to the question, "Did Paul fall off a horse, or not?" Protestants routinely answer in the negative, because the passages in Acts do not mention a horse, let alone falling off of one. But Catholics routinely answer in the affirmative, largely because of the history of art, in particular the Caravaggio.
A higher-up Pharisee type, a Roman citizen, travelling a considerable distance (to Damascus) on official business, would be on horseback. He wouldn't have "fallen to the earth" had he been in a chariot, like the Ethiopian eunuch in Acts 26 on the Gaza road, and under no circumstances would he have WALKED. Not befitting his authority.
God must have a special purpose for him, to speak to him so directly.
There are some stiking parallels between the conversions of these two. God certainly knows how to get our attention individually, that is for sure!
"stiking" = striking
I think the conversion of someone like Al Zarqawi would mirror St. Paul's (though St. Paul wasn't hacking off heads).
I can think of some brighter markers, but I digress...
Order Pope Benedict XVI's First Encyclical Now!
God Is Love (Deus Caritas Est)
|
USCCB is proud to offer, God Is Love (Deus Caritas Est), the first encyclical from Pope Benedict XVI. In this landmark work, the Holy Father explains the various dimensions of love, and links the Church's charitable work with the love of God as Trinity, noting that the Church must express love through acts of justice and charity. He also points out that charity is an essential element of the Church's activity and discusses the proper relationship between justice and charity. |
 |
|
Order copies of Pope Benedict's first encyclical for:
|
||
English: No. 5-758, 64 pp., $6.95 Spanish: No. 5-922, 64 pp., $6.95 |
||
Order Now! Available Febr. 14, 2006 Order online at www.usccbpublishing.org Or call us at 800-235-8722. |
||
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.