Posted on 01/16/2005 9:59:41 PM PST by Coleus
Judging Terri
Thou Shalt Not Kill
by Luiz Sérgio Solimeo
For some years now the case of Theresa (Terri) Schiavo has sparked a white hot controversy in American public opinion. After collapsing at home early in 1990, Terri has been in what some call a Persistent Vegetative State (PVS). Brain damage has left her unable to communicate or swallow. As a result, she receives her all sustenance through a feeding tube.
The controversy began when her husband, Michael Schiavo ordered the removal of her feeding tube. However, this action was opposed by her parents who are committed to saving her life.
The resulting struggle has been an emotionally charged debate, pitting “quality of life” advocates against pro-life activists. “Terri’s fight” has defied all odds: Court-ordered removal of her feeding tube, lawsuits and adverse judicial decisions. She has become a national figure reflecting a grassroots reaction to the heartless, yet relentless efforts to deprive her of life.
Terri’s Condition
To properly judge her case, one must go beyond the emotional issues and look at the moral principles involved. Much depends on analyzing her condition and applying natural ethics and Church teaching.
Although there is some controversy on whether Terri’s condition is vegetative, Dr. Eugene F. Diamond, in a Statement of the Catholic Medical Association, explained that this state cannot be assimilated with coma: “Coma and vegetative state are states devoid of consciousness. In order to be conscious, the patient must be awake and aware. A patient in coma is neither awake nor aware. A patient in a vegetative state is awake, but not aware. Awareness requires wakefulness, but wakefulness can be present without awareness.”1
Moreover, there are many cases, albeit uncommon, of people in a PVS who have recovered, sometimes after a long periods of time.
In either case, the patient’s case can be easily sustained and Dr. Diamond highlights, “the decision to withhold food and drink would be the proximate cause of death” not the illness itself. He explains, “the continuation of feedings does not constitute extraordinary care. The use of nasogastric feeding is probably a century old and gastrostomies have been employed for at least fifty years.”
Life Is Not Measured by Usefulness
Regardless of her chances for survival, the most important consideration is that a person in this state is a living person. Life is not measure by its usefulness to others or its “quality.” Life is gift of God. A living person who depends on others for his survival, be he a baby or a disabled adult, maintains the rights of a human person.
Unfortunately, Terri’s husband and his legal team think differently. Aided by the American Civil Liberties Unions (ACLU) and the implicit approval of many bioethicists and liberal media, Mr. Schiavo successfully petitioned for the removal of her feeding tube and hydration line. The reaction to this brutal move was so great that more than 100,000 people contacted Governor Jeb Bush demanding that he intervene. The Florida Legislature forced doctors to reinstall the feeding tube in Terri Schiavo, by passing his controversial “Terri’s law.”
In May 2004, the “Terri’s Law” was declared unconstitutional by Circuit Judge W. Douglas Baird. Later, Pinellas-Pasco Circuit Court Judge George Greer “issued an order preventing Schiavo's husband from removing the feeding tube until at least Dec. 6 so lawyers can appeal his decision.” Governor Jeb Bush is petitioning for review of the case to the Supreme Court.2
The Catholic Response
Although moralists have debated artificial feeding, there is no doubt on where the Catholic Church stands. This is especially clear in light of recent and unequivocal teaching from the Vatican.
From a moral standpoint, this dramatic case should be judged according the principles of natural law. John Paul II outlines Church teaching in his March 2004 Address to the Participants in the International Congress on "Life-Sustaining Treatments and Vegetative State: Scientific Advances and Ethical Dilemmas."3
The document stated that the term “vegetative life” is ambiguous and can lead to misinterpretation, because a man is never a vegetable, but rather maintains his humanity, regardless of his health condition. He states:
I feel the duty to reaffirm strongly that the intrinsic value and personal dignity of every human being do not change, no matter what the concrete circumstances of his or her life. A man, even if seriously ill or disabled in the exercise of his highest functions, is and always will be a man, and he will never become a "vegetable" or an "animal."
Even our brothers and sisters who find themselves in the clinical condition of a ‘vegetative state’ retain their human dignity in all its fullness. The loving gaze of God the Father continues to fall upon them, acknowledging them as his sons and daughters, especially in need of help.
Feeding Is Not an Extraordinary Means
Facing the uncertainty of many moralists about whether artificial feeding (or to be more precise, assisted feeding) is an ordinary or an extraordinary means of health care, the Pope is clear and precise:
I should like particularly to underline how the administration of water and food, even when provided by artificial means, always represents a natural means of preserving life, not a medical act. Its use, furthermore, should be considered, in principle, ordinary and proportionate, and as such morally obligatory, insofar as and until it is seen to have attained its proper finality, which in the present case consists in providing nourishment to the patient and alleviation of his suffering… The evaluation of probabilities, founded on waning hopes for recovery when the vegetative state is prolonged beyond a year, cannot ethically justify the cessation or interruption of minimal care for the patient, including nutrition and hydration. Death by starvation or dehydration is, in fact, the only possible outcome as a result of their withdrawal. In this sense it ends up becoming, if done knowingly and willingly, true and proper euthanasia by omission.
A Fight for Innocent Life
According to natural law and the teachings of Holy Mother Church, it is obvious where all Catholics must stand, not only in Terri’s case but that of countless others whose feeding tubes are removed.
As a Catholic, Terri deserves the support of the Faithful. It is a sad testimony of the times that all do not actually come to her defense. Rather, it falls to the countless prayers of grassroots activists, who call upon God and apply pressure to frustrate the efforts of those who would end her life.
_________________
1. Linacre Institute Paper, Assisted Nutrition And Hydration In Persistent Vegetative State By Eugene F. Diamond, M.D., http://www.cathmed.org/publications/positionpapers.html.
2. William R. Levesque, Judge orders Schiavo's feeding tube in till Dec. 6 A judge's ruling keeps Terri Schiavo's feeding tube in place while additional legal appeals continue to be heard, St. Petersburg Times, October 23, 2004, http://www.prisonpotpourri.com /SCHIAVO/Tampabay%20Judge% 20orders%20Schiavo's %20feeding%20 tube%20in%20till%20Dec_%206.html.
3.Cf. http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/speeches/2004/
march/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_20040320_congress-fiamc_en.html.
Bump!
My email to Jeb Bush. It is factual and shocking. These are republican judges doing the dirty work.
Governor Bush, I have heard from multiple sources tha Terri is trying to talk and has been trying to speak for some time now.
I KNOW THE PREMISE THAT TERRI IS PVS IS A FALSE PREMISE.
THE PREMISE THAT A FEEDING TUBE IS MEDICAL TREATMENT IS ALSO A FALSE PREMISE (I have nothing but disdain for Senator Jim King) and for the Pinellas County Judges who SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED. They have all committed high crimes and misdemeanors but it appears THEY WON'T BE INVESTIGATED BECAUSE THEY ARE REPUBLICANS.
Terri cannot help it that some Republicans are trying to save her life and others are trying to KILL HER. WILL THE REPUBLICAN JUDGES MURDER A DISABLED WOMAN, ALA NAZI GERMANY. If so, I'll be making bumper stickers for Pinellas County: "PINELLAS COUNTY, FOR THE NAZI IN YOU".
Judge Greer said at the last starvation-dehydration crisis "I don't want anybody to feed that girl."
THAT GIRL??? Give me a break.
THAT GIRL HAS A RIGHT TO LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS.
PLEASE MEET TERRI AND YOU'LL SEE HER PERSONALITY, HER GENTLE, JOYOUS DEMEANOR.
LET'S LOVE THAT GIRL, NOT HAVE JUDGES AND MEDICAID DOCTORS MURDER HER.
PLEASE MEET TERRI, EVERY DAY SHE IS CAGED, I GET MORE AND MORE OUTRAGED.....
STATE ATTY Bernie McCabe is protecting his pal JUDGE GREER AND JUDGE BAIRD. This is the biggest CRIME IN PINELLAS HISTORY - Bernie McCabe has NOT DONE HIS JOB unless it includes defending the defenseless, Judge Greer!
floriduh voter
PS: As you may know, the Pinellas GOP "hung up on me" for saying I SUPPORTED YOU, THE HOUSE & SENATE. AREN'T YOU THE HEAD OF THE FLORIDA REPUBLICAN PARTY? HOW CAN THIS BE that I call about preserving a life and the Pinellas GOP hangs up on me? 727-539-6009. THEIR PHONE NUMBER.
Ping to 5.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1310171/posts
PLEASE PRAY FOR TERRI.
ProLife Ping!
If anyone wants on or off my ProLife Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
bump.
I'm posting links to videos of Terri for people who haven't seen them yet. The videos are in Real Media format. They clearly show that Terri IS NOT in a coma nor in a persistant vegetative state. Terri interacts with people around her especially with her beloved family. M
Michael Schiavo's attorney, Deborah Bushnell, has repeatedly threatened Terri's family with contempt of court because they dare show these videos of their daughter to the public.
http://web.tampabay.rr.com/ccb/videos/Terri_Mum.rm
http://web.tampabay.rr.com/ccb/videos/Terri_music.rm
http://web.tampabay.rr.com/ccb/videos/balloon.rm
http://web.tampabay.rr.com/ccb/videos/hows_that_cold.rm
That's the sixty-four thousand dollar question, pal.
NO one should be trying to kill the child of Terri's parents , no one. The big error here has been to allow the man who married her at one time, to continue to be called her husband, when he has been living with another woman for years and has fathered two children out of wedlock. I would want NO man like Michael to be called my husband.
He is just a man living with another woman who wants rid of his disabled wife. That is all he is, and nothing more.
"Attorney: What did you do with your wife’s jewelry?
Michael: My wife’s jewelry?
Attorney: Yeah.
Michael: Um, I think I took her engagement ring and her...what do they call it...diamond wedding band and made a ring for myself."
What a freakin' lowlife scumbag!...he needs a step ladder to see a snakes butt!
They pulled five of Terri's teeth last year. Hmmm, was there gold in these teeth?
Also During these arguments george felos said michael had been threated 2 days before and no other comment was made bout this. judge greer granted the HINO a bodyguard. greer also said the bodyguard was to be paid for with Terri's $700,000 settlement that was awarded to her to pay for her medical bills. Is Terri still paying for HINO's bodyguard?...is HINO ever going to be made to pay for anything, anything at all???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.