Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary vs Rush on Race
NewsMax.com ^ | 10/09/03 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 10/09/2003 7:34:47 AM PDT by kattracks

The most widely heard complaint regarding Rush Limbaugh's observation that African-American quarterback Donovan McNabb received more favorable press coverage than he deserved goes something like this: Right or wrong, Limbaugh shouldn't have interjected McNabb's race into the argument.

But if Rush's critics really mean what they say, where were they two months ago when New York Sen. Hillary Clinton declared in the midst of a speech on civil rights that she was glad she grew up in the segregated suburbs?

Addressing the American Constitution Society on Aug. 3, Mrs. Clinton criticized Republicans for idealizing "the 1950s white suburbs for family life, which I grew up in and write about in my book – and am very grateful for – but didn't exactly describe the universal experience in America?"

Imagine if Limbaugh had said he was "grateful" that he grew up "in the 1950's white suburbs."

After all, which is worse: A political commentator observing that the press practices affirmative action when it comes to covering black quarterbacks. Or the most powerful Democrat in the country clearly suggesting that the all-white culture of her youth was superior that anything black America had to offer at the time?

Of course, there was no press coverage [except for NewsMax] when Hillary touted her segregated roots. And little public outrage, except from Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson, head of the Brotherhood Organization of a New Destiny - who called on Sen. Clinton to explain herself.

That's too bad. If conservatives demanded that liberals be held to the same standard they are, the left's racial McCarthyism would likely cease overnight.

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:

Media Bias
Sen. Hillary Clinton



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: doublestandard; espn; hillaryclinton; mediabias; pilingon; queenhillary; racebaiting; racialdivision; rushbashing; senatorclinton; senatorhillary

1 posted on 10/09/2003 7:34:47 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
And as far as I know, no one in the media, especially the so-called "tough NY press" (who seem to turn into wimpering pussycats when it comes to Hillary!), ever followed up on the infamous "f**king Jew B**tard" comment by Her Highness. Hillary! denied it, the press accepted it without question, and flushed the whole thing down the memory hole. Isn't it strange (not!) that they will not do likewise with Limbaugh?
2 posted on 10/09/2003 7:40:57 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chimera
But you must remember, the media is not biased. < /sarcasm>
3 posted on 10/09/2003 7:42:32 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
We Replaced Patrick Leahy's Brains With Folger's Crystals. Let's See If Anyone Notices!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

4 posted on 10/09/2003 7:42:54 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I know this is about the race issue but I wrote this Rush support poem this morning concerning the other media circus.
5 posted on 10/09/2003 7:45:30 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (I have over 41 years experience, at acting 8 years old. That will be 42 years in Jan 04.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"It reeks of McCarthyism."

You know, that seems to be the left's favorite objection for any policy which might even the playing field between Democrats and Republicans. And why not? After all, Joseph McCarthy is widely considered the most hated senator in American history. By associating anything they don't like with that guy, therefore, they can cut off a debate before the other side even gets to define terms. (My objection: "It reeks of filibusterism.")

I've heard liberals moan and gripe about not being able to speak their minds re: the war on terror. News flash: there ARE no communist witch hunts going on today, and you are PERFECTLY free to speak against the war. To quote Ann Coulter, "We'll let you know when you're being censored."

By the way, speaking of censorship all the way from the Oval Office, I hear many rumors about Bill and Hillary opponents who kind of, you know, "disappeared." Is there a web site or book that documents these incidents in any sort of detail?

6 posted on 10/09/2003 8:20:34 PM PDT by MegaSilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson