Skip to comments.
We Must Fight the Evil Indians
10-3-03
Posted on 10/03/2003 7:16:31 AM PDT by tallhappy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141 next last
1
posted on
10/03/2003 7:16:32 AM PDT
by
tallhappy
To: tallhappy
Put down the firewater chief.
2
posted on
10/03/2003 7:19:15 AM PDT
by
Tijeras_Slim
(Ideas in tagline are closer than they appear.)
To: All
We Replaced Patrick Leahy's Brains With Folger's Crystals. Let's See If Anyone Notices!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3
posted on
10/03/2003 7:19:50 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: tallhappy
My sentiments are with McClintock, but this is off the mark. Schwarzenegger is making a legitimate point that Indian gambling has become too powerful in state politics. Their campaign cash is buying them far too much influence, and I'm disappointed that McClintock took it. I'd much rather that he had pledged to rein them in than accept their money.
To: tallhappy
Either your post makes little sense, or you're from California.
5
posted on
10/03/2003 7:21:25 AM PDT
by
Bon mots
To: tallhappy; BibChr; onyx; PhiKapMom; Tamsey; redlipstick; habs4ever; My2Cents; South40; ...
tallhappy........please start taking those meds again. You're coming unglued here.
PING
6
posted on
10/03/2003 7:21:30 AM PDT
by
EggsAckley
(..........................all my pings are belong to ......YOU.....................)
To: tallhappy
Will our champion fight those who seek to classify and categorize us based on who our mother and fathers areIf you are for Prop 54 you should should be against the Indian Mafia laws. They allow one race of people exclusive right to start a tax-free business based solely on their ancestry.
7
posted on
10/03/2003 7:26:58 AM PDT
by
BigBobber
To: tallhappy
Is this a Big Endian / Little Endian issue?
8
posted on
10/03/2003 7:28:29 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(France delenda est)
To: tallhappy; EggsAckley
Thanks for the ping, "zactly" ;0)
Tallhappy,
Do you work for the LASlimes? If not you might have a bright future there. Think about it.
9
posted on
10/03/2003 7:29:08 AM PDT
by
LisaAnne
To: tallhappy
You sound like a blind man who upon encountering an elephant's trunk, set off to warn the population about a giant hovering snake.
Indians have had it rough over the centuries. They suffer dispreportionally from fetal alcohol syndrome, diabetes, poverty and many other afflictions of the dispirited and disenfranchized from there centuries old culture.
Now, I am not going to debate you. You lack citation or reasoned argument here to support your argument, infact an argumant is hard to find in your vanity at all.
I would suggest you learn more of the issue before jumping in like this.
Gambling is an affliction too, and I don't like casinos much either. But you look like a man waving a knife at a gunfight. And a good example of why Jim Robinson posted yesterday asking us not to do what you are doing here.
10
posted on
10/03/2003 7:31:28 AM PDT
by
bicycle thug
(Fortia facere et pati Americanum est.)
To: ClearCase_guy
Is this a Big Endian / Little Endian issue? This is the kind of literary excellence you would never find on DU or any other site. Bravo for the well-educated!
One little, two little, three little Endians!
11
posted on
10/03/2003 7:32:46 AM PDT
by
50sDad
("There are FOUR LIGHTS! FOUR LIGHTS!")
To: BigBobber
They allow one race of people exclusive right to start a tax-free business based solely on their ancestry. You should have just conquered rather then making treaty with then sovereign (and still partly autonomous) people.
12
posted on
10/03/2003 7:33:09 AM PDT
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(The universe runs through the complex interweaving of energy, matter, and enlightened self interest.)
To: tallhappy
I agree. We must fight the greedy outsourcers who have sent so many American IT jobs to Bombay, Delhi and Calcutta.
13
posted on
10/03/2003 7:34:09 AM PDT
by
Alouette
(Neocon Zionist Media Operative)
To: EggsAckley; tallhappy
Eggs --- you pinged me to this vomitacious post! HURL - BARF - HURL
Keep embarrassing yourself, tallhappy. Pathetic.
14
posted on
10/03/2003 7:34:21 AM PDT
by
onyx
(Ask the Indian$)
To: onyx
Maybe it's just me, but I think tallhappy has gotten WORSE than last week. Maybe he/she just can't find any pro-McC articles to post and now has to resort to writing them him/herself.
Pretty pathetic.
15
posted on
10/03/2003 7:36:42 AM PDT
by
EggsAckley
(..........................all my pings are belong to ......YOU.....................)
To: John Jorsett
My sentiments are with McClintock, but this is off the mark. Schwarzenegger is making a legitimate point that Indian gambling has become too powerful in state politics. So are you suggesting that we tax them in order to reduce their influence? How much should they be taxed in order for their influence to be reduced to the point that you feel comfortable with them. And once you have started down that road, do you think talk radio hosts should be taxed because they have become very influential. Likewise, should rich people have their taxes increased because they can do the same thing as the Indian tribes, which is pay for independent advertising?
To: Tijeras_Slim
>>> Put down the firewater Chief. <<<
ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
17
posted on
10/03/2003 7:38:05 AM PDT
by
onyx
(Ask the Indian$)
To: tallhappy
I am offended by your use of the term "Indian." You should use the politically correct term. Thanks for playing.
To: vbmoneyspender
So are you suggesting that we tax them in order to reduce their influence? Our champion's people say do not ask questions.
Logic, no.
To: vbmoneyspender
Whoever is the recipient of the benefits of affirmative action gaming laws should repay the taxpayers for the infrastructure that has been provided by the taxpayers. Those affirmative action law benders should also be barred from making unlimited independent expenditures in political races.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson