Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gallup: Either McClintock or Schwarzenegger Likely Winner in California if Other Dropped Out
Gallup ^ | 9-30-03 | Gallup

Posted on 09/29/2003 9:41:43 PM PDT by ambrose

T H E   G A L L U P   O R G A N I Z A T I O N

SOURCE: http://www.gallup.com
CONTACT INFORMATION:

Media Relations 1-202-715-3030
Subscriber Relations 1-888-274-5447
World Headquarters
901 F Street
Washington, DC 20004


 


 

 

POLL ANALYSES

Either McClintock or Schwarzenegger Likely Winner in California if Other Dropped Out
Most of vote for one candidate would go to other

GALLUP NEWS SERVICE

PRINCETON, NJ -- With Arnold Schwarzenegger the Republican front-runner in the California gubernatorial contest, many GOP officials have pressured California State Sen. Tom McClintock to drop out of the race, fearing he will divide the Republican vote and allow Democratic Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante to win. A CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll, conducted over the past weekend, shows that McClintock does indeed draw support away from Schwarzenegger, though not enough to deprive the actor of the lead. But the poll also shows that if Schwarzenegger were not in the race, McClintock would likely be in first place by a substantial margin rather than behind Bustamante.

The poll of California voters, conducted Sept. 25-27, finds McClintock with just 16% of the vote among registered voters, and 18% among probable voters. That puts him in third place behind Bustamante and Schwarzenegger.

Next, I'm going to read a list of some of the 135 candidates running to replace Gray Davis as governor if he is removed from office. After I read these names, please tell me which of these candidates you would be most likely to vote for if the election were held today, if you would vote for someone else, or if you would not vote for anyone for governor. [ROTATED: Actor Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican; Lieutenant Governor Cruz Bustamante, a Democrat; Columnist AriannaHuffington, an independent; State Senator Tom McClintock, a Republican; and Financial Advisor, Peter Miguel Camejo of the Green Party] (If someone else, who do you plan to vote for?)

Schwarz-
enegger


Busta-
mante


McClin-
tock


Camejo


Huff-
ington

OTHER
(vol.)

None/
No opinion

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

Registered Voters

2003 Sep 25-27

34

28

16

4

2

2

14

Probable Voters

2003 Sep 25-27

40

25

18

5

2

1

9

The third-place showing by McClintock underestimates his overall strength. Both Republican candidates enjoy a favorable rating among more than 6 in 10 probable voters, while fewer than 4 in 10 probable voters give Bustamante a favorable rating. Of the three leading contenders, McClintock has the lowest negatives. Only 20% of probable voters have an unfavorable view of McClintock, compared with a 30% unfavorable rating for Schwarzenegger and 54% unfavorable for Bustamante.

Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of [NAME], or have you never heard of this person?

Arnold Schwarzenegger

Favorable

Unfavorable

Never heard of

No opinion

%

%

%

%

Registered Voters

2003 Sep 25-27

59

31

1

9

Probable Voters

2003 Sep 25-27

63

30

*

7

* Less than 0.5%

Tom McClintock

Favorable

Unfavorable

Never heard of

No opinion

%

%

%

%

Registered Voters

2003 Sep 25-27

58

18

7

17

Probable Voters

2003 Sep 25-27

62

20

4

14

Cruz Bustamante

Favorable

Unfavorable

Never heard of

No opinion

%

%

%

%

Registered Voters

2003 Sep 25-27

44

46

3

7

Probable Voters

2003 Sep 25-27

37

54

3

6

Furthermore, when McClintock is pitted against just Bustamante, among probable voters the Republican state senator beats the Democratic candidate handily -- by 19 percentage points.

If the choice were between Cruz Bustamante, the Democrat and Tom McClintock, the Republican, who would you be more likely to vote for [ROTATED -- Cruz Bustamante, (or) Tom McClintock]?


Bustamante


McClintock

NEITHER (vol.)

OTHER
(vol.)

No
opinion

%

%

%

%

%

Registered Voters

2003 Sep 25-27

42

49

6

*

3

Probable Voters

2003 Sep 25-27

37

56

5

*

2

(vol.) Volunteered response

* Less than 0.5%

On the other hand, the poll shows Schwarzenegger would also beat Bustamante in a two-man race among probable voters -- but by a slightly larger 22-point margin (58% to 36%).

If the choice were between Cruz Bustamante, the Democrat and Arnold Schwarzenegger, the Republican, who would you be more likely to vote for [ROTATED: Cruz Bustamante, (or) Arnold Schwarzenegger]?


Bustamante


Schwarzen-
egger

NEITHER (vol.)

OTHER
(vol.)

No
opinion

%

%

%

%

%

Registered Voters

2003 Sep 25-27

39

52

6

*

3

Probable Voters

2003 Sep 25-27

36

58

4

*

2

(vol.) Volunteered response

* Less than 0.5%

If Schwarzenegger were to drop out of the race (and all other candidates remained), McClintock would pick up 64% of the actor's vote, while Bustamante would get just 6% of that vote. The net result would be a 48% to 31% lead by McClintock over Bustamante.

On the other hand, if McClintock were to drop out of the race, Schwarzenegger would get a majority of the probable vote. Just over 62% of the state senator's support would go to Schwarzenegger, while only 8% would go to Bustamante -- leaving the actor with a 56% to 29% lead over Bustamante.

Thus, while either Republican could probably win if the other dropped out, GOP leaders are pressuring McClintock -- the slightly weaker candidate according to this poll -- to quit the race in order to ensure a Republican victory. The fact that he would be such a strong candidate without Schwarzenegger may help to explain why McClintock has been so reluctant to accede to the GOP leaders' wishes.

Survey Methods

These results are based on telephone interviews with a randomly selected sample of 1,007 Californians, aged 18 years and older, conducted Sept. 25-27, 2003. For results based on this sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum error attributable to sampling and other random effects is ±3 percentage points. In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.

For results based on the sample of 787 Californians who are registered to vote, the maximum margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points.

Probable voters include a subsample of 581 survey respondents deemed most likely to vote in the October 7, 2003 California recall election, based on their level of interest and intention to vote. This definition assumes a turnout of 51% in the recall election. For results based on the sample of probable voters, one can say with 95% confidence that the margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points.

This poll was conducted in both English and Spanish -- 73 out of 1,007 interviews were conducted in Spanish.

In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.



TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: bustamante; gallup; graydavis; mcclintock; polls; recall; schwarzenegger; tomcanwin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-163 next last

1 posted on 09/29/2003 9:41:43 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

"But McClintock can't win!"

-

Hmmm... is this the Free Republic or Vichy Republic?

2 posted on 09/29/2003 9:42:46 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jtill
Ha. There is still hope.
3 posted on 09/29/2003 9:43:10 PM PDT by halfdome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Then why won't that RINO married to a Kennedy drop out? I don't trust him, but he's got the media behind him.
4 posted on 09/29/2003 9:44:16 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
:-)
5 posted on 09/29/2003 9:45:41 PM PDT by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
"But McClintock can't win!"

For once you're right; he can't.

6 posted on 09/29/2003 9:46:13 PM PDT by South40 (Vote Mcclintock, elect bustamante)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
You and I both knew that in a two person race, McClintock in the present climate would probably defeat Bustamante. But that is not to be. One of the really fun things about California is just how volatile it is, particularly in state elections. They are few anchors that weigh down voting blocks as per most other states. That is because in California, neither of the national parties resonate very well.
7 posted on 09/29/2003 9:46:18 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
OK, this is taking longer than I thought .... where are all of the McClintock types calling for Arnold to step down so that Sen Tom "I registered first" McC can breeze into the Mansion? I totally understand the logic of asking the frontrunner by an OVERWHELMING margin to step aside. God knows if I were running and had a less popular but more 'ideologically pure' opponent I'd just jump right down off the stage and go home.
8 posted on 09/29/2003 9:46:19 PM PDT by BlueNgold (Feed the Tree .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Gasp!! McClintock is electable!!

The convenient sheet behind which the RINOs have hid is removed.

9 posted on 09/29/2003 9:47:01 PM PDT by ForOurFuture (This just in: Both could beat Bustamante. Only one is conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Tom McClintock has taught me the importance of MOMENTUM and the poll clearly shows that Arnold Schwarzenneger has the momentum to win.
10 posted on 09/29/2003 9:47:40 PM PDT by Tempest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Who was the one guy who never heard of Schwarzenegger? Quick, somebody call him and let him know Nixon resigned!
11 posted on 09/29/2003 9:48:27 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper
I would LOVE for Arnie to drop out just to put the issue about conservatives in California to rest once and for all, one way or the other.
12 posted on 09/29/2003 9:49:18 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
At the moment McClintock would be elected. Perhaps that is in part because all the Dems are saying such nice things about him.
13 posted on 09/29/2003 9:50:22 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ForOurFuture
If you think that if Arnold dropped out, we'd get McClintock, you would be wrong.

In CA, there are more people who fear the "right wing" than people who want a conservative on office.

The recall would simply not take place. I think many liberals would simply vote no on the recall, since they don't seem to like Buster much.

14 posted on 09/29/2003 9:50:50 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Tom need to drop out. It seems that even less people know who he is since he strated the race! LOL!!! Soon to be as irrelevant as France! Viva La Tom!
15 posted on 09/29/2003 9:51:17 PM PDT by Tempest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
On a more serious note:
I am VERY concerned about 'push polling' trying to get conservatives to
(a) stay home because they think the recall of Davis is a done deal and their votes are not needed, and
(b) split the vote to keep their plan B alive.

Maybe I'm in need of my tinfoil hat on this one, but it's a thought I can't shake.

16 posted on 09/29/2003 9:51:35 PM PDT by BlueNgold (Feed the Tree .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
the REAL QUESTION:
Does this just mean that Davis and Busty are dispised OR
does this mean that there is a possible Republican Revolution beginning in California?

We can argue all we want about who is unelectable, and who should drop out, and if only all so-and-sos would vote for this candidate . . .

But I am interested in what it MEANS APART FROM THIS ELECTION.
17 posted on 09/29/2003 9:51:41 PM PDT by fqued (Rule number 42, the oldest rule in the book.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Perhaps that is in part because all the Dems are saying such nice things about him.

Wasn't Simon leading davis vs. Riroden

18 posted on 09/29/2003 9:52:09 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tempest
McClintock can beat Bustamante by a landslide--and we wouldn't have to settle for any of Arnold's social liberal big govenment crapola.

Support McClintock--put a conservative in the governorship.

19 posted on 09/29/2003 9:52:27 PM PDT by Kevin Curry (McClintock would not only win, he would win in a landslide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz; ambrose
Actually what this poll deosn't show is how the media and the Democrats have literally been giving Tom a free pass on his conservative ideals. Ideals they would normally love to rake him over the coals for.
20 posted on 09/29/2003 9:53:54 PM PDT by Tempest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-163 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson