[Bonaparte]

I'm still waiting for Yahoo, AP or any of her other leftist detractors to demonstrate factual error in her book -- instead of just saying that it's there.

[SONbrad]

You won't hear anyone FACTUALLY discredit her because they can't. What I love about Ann, besides the obvious, is that she uses the leftist's own words to destroy them and expose them for what they are.

I've read all of her books, including this one, and they are terrific!

[netmilsmom]

Me too. If anything was FACTUALLY wrong, it would be screamed all over the media.

(catch my tagline-livin in lib land!)

[Calvin Locke]

demonstrate factual error

Coulter was on one of my regular talk shows last week. She said she referred to the father of somebody [forgotten]. A critic
said "it wasn't his father, go ahead, call and ask him". She researched it again, and it was the somebody's grandfather.

And I think she said she was wrong on complaining/whining about the NYTs failure to mention [Dale] Earnhardt's death.
The Slimes did have it on page one.

My, my, these mistakes certainly reveal the entire book as one big lie.

And while we're pointing out mistakes, I reread one of my replies from last week. I typed "who's" instead of "whose".

Can I still continue to reply to messages?

[halfdome]

If you do a google search you can find many articles refuting some claims in Coulter's books. For instance, in Slander she referred to a NY Times article and gave a quote from the article about how females don't need males anymore, footnoted the passage and used it to back up a claim about the liberal press. However, when the footnote was checked, the article noted was from the Science section of the paper and was referring to a certain species of insect. A lot of the actual passages and the related footnotes with discrepances can be found on the Daily Howler website.

[manic4organic]

"I'm still waiting for Yahoo, AP or any of her other leftist detractors to demonstrate factual error in her book -- instead of just saying that it's there."

Exactly. Take notice that they fail to point out that Ann's book is absolutely loaded with footnotes and facts that prove the traitorous deeds of the Dims.