Skip to comments.
Iraq and al Qaeda
Wall Street Journal ^
| Monday, September 22, 2003
Posted on 09/22/2003 10:30:41 AM PDT by presidio9
Edited on 04/22/2004 11:49:57 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
The Bush Administration was cautious, arguably too cautious, when making its case for the liberation of Iraq. Exhibit A is what it said about the links between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda. Investigators, interrogators and even journalists are turning up evidence of a stronger relationship than the limited ties originally sketched by President Bush and Colin Powell.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; alqaedaandiraq; iraq
1
posted on
09/22/2003 10:30:41 AM PDT
by
presidio9
To: presidio9
Let's see how widely reported in the press this story is or what fat-drunk ted kennedy has to say....and again, like all the reports on 9/11 from US officials and/or captured terrorists, all this took place on Clinton's watch!!
To: Dog; PhiKapMom; Coop; Timesink; Wait4Truth; OldFriend; Miss Marple
Yet another great article about links between Iraq and AQ, from the Wall Street Journal.
3
posted on
09/22/2003 10:51:18 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: God luvs America
Why isn't the Bush administration advertising this information more?
To: Peach; section9; Miss Marple; Angelus Errare; Coop; William McKinley; seamole; Shermy; Poohbah; ...
According to Insight magazine, the CIA's Paul Pillar, National Intelligence Officer for the Near East, used a lecture at Johns Hopkins University earlier this year to criticize the President's war on terror. He said that there was no evidence of Iraqi terror sponsorship since 1993, and no evidence of its involvement in the World Trade Center bombing that year. Curiously, we hear the agency has so far declined to share the file found in Iraq on Yasin (the 1993 New York bombing suspect) with other branches of the government.Who in the CIA is withholding info of a Iraq-Al Qaeda link....?
5
posted on
09/22/2003 11:51:39 AM PDT
by
Dog
To: Dog
Definitely a Clinton hold-out.
6
posted on
09/22/2003 11:57:37 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: presidio9
The Clinton administration did everything it could to keep terror events from being linked to a nation state, because then there would have to be a military response, and that can they would rather kick into the future, for some other sucker to deal with.
They succeeded, and we are the suckers. The then somewhat politicized, and now only slightly less politicized CIA and FBI would also have to answer to this blunder, and they won't go down without a fight.
To: presidio9
bttt
8
posted on
09/22/2003 1:04:26 PM PDT
by
vin-one
(I wish i had something clever to put in this tag)
To: presidio9
About a month after September 11, reports surfaced that lead hijacker Mohammed Atta had met in Prague with an Iraqi embassy official and intelligence agent named Ahmed al-Ani link
9
posted on
09/22/2003 2:57:05 PM PDT
by
lwd
To: Rocky Mountain High
I think GW likes to play poker.
10
posted on
09/22/2003 4:01:36 PM PDT
by
Milligan
To: presidio9
bttt
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson