Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bustamante challenges CBA debate participants to withdraw (MCClintock "reacts positively"
CNN ^ | Sept,. 18, 2003 | CNN News

Posted on 09/18/2003 4:17:49 PM PDT by FairOpinion

Edited on 04/29/2004 2:03:08 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Next week is the only scheduled California recall debate that Schwarzenegger has agreed to attend. The debate, sponsored by the California Broadcasters Association, has been criticized for providing candidates with the questions in advance.

At a different debate Wednesday in Los Angeles, Bustamante asked the other participants to boycott the CBA event.


(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: bustamante; california; debate; mcclintock; recall; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
I think this is disgusting for McClintock to go along with the Democrats and all gang up on Arnold.

On second thought, if they do, I hope the CBA holds the debate with THEIR empty chairs and gives the full time to Arnold.

1 posted on 09/18/2003 4:17:51 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BonnieJ
Thanks for alerting me to the information, I did a search and found this article.
2 posted on 09/18/2003 4:18:56 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
CA recall ping
3 posted on 09/18/2003 4:19:17 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Turnabout is fair play isn't it? Arnold flipped the bird to the first three debates, and now they may return the favor for the final debate.
4 posted on 09/18/2003 4:21:45 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Maybe if there are 3 empty chairs then Arnold could debate the 3 judges from the 9th circuit on the merits of their "recall stall".
5 posted on 09/18/2003 4:22:35 PM PDT by amexmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
As I said, let them all stay home, for all I care, and let Arnold get the full time on TV.
6 posted on 09/18/2003 4:23:06 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Well, McClintock is disgusting. What do you expect?
7 posted on 09/18/2003 4:23:17 PM PDT by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Oh well, maybe Arnold can just hire some extras..
8 posted on 09/18/2003 4:23:52 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (one mile from the Capitol in DC...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
The "questions in advance" line is a canard. In truth, this may be the toughest debate format I've seen in recent memory. According to Weintraub, there is going to be a lot of Lincoln-Douglas back and forth under this format. In other words, the candidate cannot give a canned speech and then pass over to the next candidate.
9 posted on 09/18/2003 4:23:52 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
I hope the CBA holds the debate with THEIR empty chairs and gives the full time to Arnold.

So do I. The rest are acting like children.
Maybe they aren't adult enough to become Governors.
GROW UP !

10 posted on 09/18/2003 4:24:29 PM PDT by concerned about politics (Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Perhaps its a feint within feint - the other candidates will drop out and then the debate will be between Arnold and Tom. Now that would be a debate to watch!!
11 posted on 09/18/2003 4:26:03 PM PDT by Rabid Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
The "questions in advance" line is a canard. In truth, this may be the toughest debate format I've seen in recent memory. According to Weintraub, there is going to be a lot of Lincoln-Douglas back and forth under this format. In other words, the candidate cannot give a canned speech and then pass over to the next candidate.

===

Thanks for the information. So who are the real cowards?

12 posted on 09/18/2003 4:27:28 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Arnold flipped the bird to the first three debates,

....because Arnold only knows the answers when his advisors give them to him!!!!!!!!!

13 posted on 09/18/2003 4:27:44 PM PDT by GrandMoM ("What is impossible with men is possible with GOD -Luke 18:27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
You better add Arnold to your list of disgusting people - his campaign sent a letter to the CBA asking them to do away with the format too.
14 posted on 09/18/2003 4:29:49 PM PDT by evilsmoker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
...Mark Powers of the California Broadcasters Association said he wasn't surprised at Bustamante's challenge.
He said the format of the debate allows for long discussions on the pre-released questions, rather than quick sound bites, and claimed that Bustamante and his campaign officials might be nervous.

"They really don't care for the format," Powers said. "After they saw the questions they were scared to death.

BustaCHICKEN ping.
15 posted on 09/18/2003 4:35:50 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evilsmoker
"You better add Arnold to your list of disgusting people - his campaign sent a letter to the CBA asking them to do away with the format too. "

===

But he didn't threaten to boycott the debates, if they didn't.
16 posted on 09/18/2003 4:35:51 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
I'm disappointed McClintock would even think about this. I may be attending the ATF event tonight, and I will be sure to ask about this.

I would really like to see him against Arnold.

And I'd love to see them both against Bustamante, which I think is exactly why he doesn't want to attend. They will rip Bustamante to shreds just like happened in previous debates.

D
17 posted on 09/18/2003 4:35:58 PM PDT by daviddennis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
The debate over debates is a time honored tradition in politics.

Arnold wanted to have just one debate for maximum exposure. It would make strategic sense for the other candidates to refuse to play along with Arnold's own strategic play.
18 posted on 09/18/2003 4:38:01 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Turnabout is fair play isn't it? Arnold flipped the bird to the first three debates, and now they may return the favor for the final debate.

But a key difference is that Arnold didn't agree to those other debates, whereas all the major candidates HAVE agreed to appear at THIS one. To pull out now in protest over a long-understood (and long-lampooned) refusal by AS to enter the previous debates would constitute breaking their promise, all as a stunt meant to hurt Arnold. Debates aren't unimportant, but they aren't all that important either as a measure of how good a governor one can be. This is all overblown.
19 posted on 09/18/2003 4:39:49 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion; Sabertooth
Here are the actual debate QUESTIONS, from:

Schwarzenegger, foes to face 12 queries
(Sept. 24th debate questions included)

San Francisco Chronicle ^ | September 18th, 2003 | Robert Salladay
Posted on 09/18/2003 6:25 AM PDT by Sabertooth

Sacramento -- The major candidates in the California recall will participate Sept. 24 in an unusual candidates' forum that will be hosted by the California Broadcasters Association. If the recall election is not delayed by the federal courts, it is likely to be the only statewide debate featuring Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger side-by-side with other major candidates.

Unlike a traditional debate, all candidates will know in advance which questions they will be asked, "in order to spur public discussion prior to the debate and initiate a dynamic interaction among candidates," said Stan Statham, president of the association.

Statham said that rather than surprising candidates with questions from a panel of reporters -- prompting canned answers in a short period of time -- the new format "features an open-ended, unpredictable conversational exchange between five candidates that will disclose much more than their proposed policies; it will reveal a great deal about their character and personality as well."

Candidates will participate in a moderated discussion and rebuttal session on up to 12 questions. They are:

1. How would you propose enhancing revenue and/or what specific cuts would you propose to achieve a balanced budget?

2. Leaders in the business community are convinced that this state is losing jobs and unable to attract new businesses. If you agree, what are two things you would change to make this a more business-friendly state? If you disagree, what are the misconceptions you would like to correct?

3. How are you going to ensure that all Californians have adequate health care?

4. Everybody talks about wanting a colorblind society, but what does that actually mean to you? In other words, how do we know when we have succeeded?

5. What should be the top priority for California right now?

6. If elected governor, will you support the expansion of charter schools in California?

7. What do you expect to accomplish in the time remaining on Gray Davis' term that he could not?

8. What is the single most important piece of legislation either signed or vetoed during this past legislative session?

9. Do you support reducing the Vehicle License Fee (car tax), and if so, where would you find the revenue to replace the loss to the budget?

10. What services will your administration expect local governments to provide and what stable source of revenue will you give them to do it?

11. Under Govs. Pat Brown and Ronald Reagan, California spent up to 20 percent of its general fund on infrastructure -- such as roads, bridges, colleges, hospitals and water systems. Now we spend closer to 1 percent. Proposition 53 on the ballot raises that figure to 3 percent. What are your positions on Prop. 53, and what will you do to invest more in California's aging infrastructure?

12. As our population continues to age, the demand for government services to seniors will increase dramatically during the next decade. What do you intend to do to proactively manage this demand?

The Broadcasters Association said a special panel of academics, pollsters, journalists, political consultants and elections experts selected the questions for the forum, which will be held at California State University at Sacramento...
CLICK HERE for the rest of that thread

20 posted on 09/18/2003 4:39:55 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson