Skip to comments.
Giant star caught swallowing three planets
New Scientist ^
| 09/17/03
| Emma Young
Posted on 09/17/2003 7:27:05 AM PDT by bedolido
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
To: bedolido
Is it conceivable that our sun could even swallow Uranus?
(well SOMEONE had to bring it up ;-)
41
posted on
09/17/2003 9:39:57 AM PDT
by
SteveH
((Can't we all just GET ALONG!?! ;-))
To: bedolido
star burp bump
42
posted on
09/17/2003 10:14:51 AM PDT
by
dinasour
To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; Timesink; dubyaismypresident; Grani; coug97; ...
Makes us look very insignificant in the overall scheme of Creation, indeed. More proof that God is good.
Just damn.
If you want on the new list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...
43
posted on
09/17/2003 10:16:49 AM PDT
by
mhking
(Laugh while you can, monkey boy...)
To: TXnMA
a great "S" Tnx for pointing that out. The image was split arbitrarily right along the galactic plane. I was kind of wondering where the other half of the Milky Way was, and there it is wrapped around the edge of the image.
44
posted on
09/17/2003 10:19:57 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
To: bedolido
The star, known as V838 Monocerotis I thought Monocerotis V838 was the virus that went around last winter?
So9
To: bedolido
The data also reveals the presence of large amounts of lithium and barium,...Indicates a relatively calm star undergoing a bowel examination.
46
posted on
09/17/2003 10:23:42 AM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: bedolido
What did Bush know, and when did he know it!
It is obvious that his administration must be fired for allowing this to happen over 40,000 years ago!
47
posted on
09/17/2003 10:25:45 AM PDT
by
Redleg Duke
(Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
To: bedolido
Giant Star Caught Swallowing Three Planets -
Minorities and Women Hurt MostSurprised nobody posted this yet.
To: bedolido
What did Bush know, and when did he know it!
It is obvious that his administration must be fired for allowing this to happen over 40,000 years ago!
49
posted on
09/17/2003 10:26:34 AM PDT
by
Redleg Duke
(Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
To: bedolido
remind me of the birth of my four children... without the annoying screaming from my wife I hope that your wife is not a freeper. Oh, four children. She's too busy to freep!
50
posted on
09/17/2003 10:28:24 AM PDT
by
twigs
To: Damocles
she seems to have engulfed many planets.
51
posted on
09/17/2003 10:30:17 AM PDT
by
steve8714
(radical, not conservative)
To: bedolido
Existing models of what will happen when our Sun expands to become a red giant, in about one billion years, suggest that Venus and Mercury will both be engulfed. The likely fate of the Earth is unclear I'll go out on a limb and say that when our Sun runs out of hydrogen, enters the red giant stage, and engulfs Mercury and Venus, we're f/ked.
52
posted on
09/17/2003 10:31:27 AM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
To: Mr. Mojo
Existing models of what will happen when our Sun expands to become a red giant, in about one billion years, suggest that Venus and Mercury will both be engulfed. The likely fate of the Earth is unclear.Democrats are probably outraged that the Bush administration hasn't created a program to deal with this. After all, we're only talking about a thousand millenia before the unthinkable happens.
I'm no scientist, but if Venus and Mercury are both engulfed, we'll have some real global warming to deal with!
To: bedolido
To everybody here: WOW! What great wit and humor.
;-) ;-) ;-)
Boy, I haven't seen the likes of this since the old days at the Atlantic Monthly web forum.
You know that entire galaxies gobble each other up too. I wonder what the surgeon general would have to say about that kind of gluttony?
54
posted on
09/17/2003 11:13:57 AM PDT
by
RangerHobbit
(I ar a publik skool gradgeet an im not stoopit)
To: All
There was a thread the other day discussing the fact that there are too many comets if the Universe is umpteen billion years old.
Scientists can't figure out where new ones come from.
This article provides the answer.
HEre is the other thread :comets
55
posted on
09/17/2003 11:28:34 AM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
To: Consort
Monocerotis bit my sister once
56
posted on
09/17/2003 11:30:11 AM PDT
by
talleyman
(Moose lips sink ships)
To: TXnMA; Rodney King
I guess what you are saying is that the universe is so vast that we aren't as significant as many think we are.
I reach the opposite conclusion, i.e., that the entire vastness of the universe is the stage which exists for the purpose of providing a physical location for the story of humanity to play out, and that its very vastness is indicative of how important the human struggle is. Which makes sense from a Christian perspective (to me at least) because if God thought mankind was important enough to send His Son to die for, it would not be surprising if He wanted to provide a mind-bogglingly vast universe as background for something so significant.
To: Pyro7480
April 2, 2003 APOD.
Movie time!
58
posted on
09/17/2003 12:50:02 PM PDT
by
petuniasevan
(On my cats' Christmas wish list: Cat flap for the fridge.)
To: bedolido
now if only i could get my wife to swallow
To: TXnMA
60
posted on
09/17/2003 12:52:01 PM PDT
by
petuniasevan
(On my cats' Christmas wish list: Cat flap for the fridge.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson