Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC Poll: Do you think the country today is safer from terrorism ?
Pollingreport.com ^ | September 10, 2003 | ABC News Poll

Posted on 09/10/2003 6:29:48 AM PDT by VRWC_minion

ABC News Poll. Sept. 4-7, 2003. N=1,004 adults nationwide. MoE ± 3 (total sample). Field work by TNS Intersearch.

.

"Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bush is handling the U.S. campaign against terrorism?"

Approve Disap-
prove
No
Opinion
   
% % %
9/03 67 28 5
4/03 79 19 2
2/03 74 23 4
1/03 71 25 4
12/02 79 20 1
10/02 74 23 4
9/02 74 24 2
7/02 83 15 2
5/02 79 19 3
4/02 81 18 2
3/02 88 10 2
1/02 88 10 2
12/01 89 9 2
10/01 92 5 3

.

"For each individual or group I name, please tell me what kind of job you think it's done dealing with the events of September 11th and the war on terrorism: excellent, good, not so good or poor. . . ." Each item asked of half the sample

    Excellent/
Good
Not So
Good/
Poor
No
Opinion
      % % %

The people of New York City

92 3 4
The U.S. armed forces 92 6 3
The country in general 85 14 1
The Department of Homeland Security 67 26 7
Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld 67 26 7
The news media 66 33 1

The U.S. Justice Department

59 35 6

The Bush Administration

55 44 1
Attorney General John Ashcroft 54 36 10
The FBI 52 39 10
The CIA and other intelligence agencies 52 41 6

.

"Now for each country I name, please tell me if you think it has or has not done enough to support the U.S. campaign against terrorism. . . ." Each item asked of half the sample

Has Done
Enough
Has Not No
Opinion
   
% % %

Great Britain

79 14 8
Pakistan 21 66 13
Germany 18 69 13
Russia 17 75 8
Saudi Arabia 17 75 8
France 10 82 8

.

"Do you think the U.S. campaign against terrorism is going very well, fairly well, not too well or not well at all?"

Very
Well
Fairly
Well
Not Too
Well
Not Well
At All
No
Opinion
% % % % %
9/03 12 57 19 10 2
4/03 26 57 10 6 1
9/02 10 60 21 8 1
7/02 15 60 16 8 1
4/02 11 63 17 9 1
3/02 21 63 10 6 1
1/02 32 56 8 4 1

.

"For each item I name, please tell me whether you think the United States has done an excellent job on it, a good job, a not-so-good job or a poor job. . . ." Each item asked of half the sample

    Excellent/
Good
Not So
Good/
Poor
No
Opinion
      % % %
Preventing further terrorist attacks in the United States 80 19 1

.

Reorganizing government agencies to improve anti-terrorism efforts 70 27 4

.

Improving U.S. intelligence-gathering and coordination 65 30 5

.

Breaking up the al Qaeda terrorist network 60 37 3

.

Winning the cooperation of other countries in fighting terrorism 42 57 -

.

"How much confidence do you have in the ability of the U.S. government to prevent further terrorist attacks against Americans in this country: a great deal, a good amount, only a fair amount or none at all?"
A
Great
Deal
A
Good
Amount
Only
A Fair
Amount
None
At All
No
Opinion
% % % % %
9/03 14 31 48 7 1
9/02 12 38 43 6 -
7/02 13 33 45 9 -
6/02 14 30 44 11 -
5/02 17 29 42 10 2
3/02 18 38 39 5 -
1/02 18 40 37 6 1
11/27/01 24 39 32 5 1
11/5-6/01 17 35 40 7 1
9/11/01 35 31 30 2 1
6/97 10 26 52 10 3
8/96 12 23 49 16 -
5/95 12 24 51 12 1

.

"How concerned are you about the possibility there will be more major terrorist attacks in the United States? Is that something that worries you a great deal, somewhat, not too much or not at all?"

A
Great
Deal
Some-
what
Not
Too
Much
Not
At All
No
Opinion
% % % % %
9/03 25 46 20 9 -
3/03 29 47 16 8 1
2/03 27 45 18 9 1
9/02 22 52 19 7 0
7/02 29 44 20 7 -
4/02 30 43 18 9 -
3/02 23 47 21 9 1
12/01 27 43 22 8 1
10/15/01 35 43 14 9 0
10/8-9/01 36 46 12 6 -
10/7/01 41 40 13 4 1

.

"How concerned are you about the chance that you personally might be the victim of a terrorist attack? Does that worry you a great deal, somewhat, not too much or not at all?"

A
Great
Deal
Some-
what
Not
Too
Much
Not
At All
No
Opinion
% % % % %
9/03 10 24 34 31 -
2/03 10 23 37 28 2
9/02 7 25 35 33 -
11/01 10 25 33 31 -

.

"Compared to before September 11, 2001, do you think the country today is safer from terrorism or less safe from terrorism?"


 
Safer Less
Safe
No
Difference
(vol.)
No
Opinion
 
% % % %  
9/03 67 27 4 2  


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: polls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Very interesting stats.
1 posted on 09/10/2003 6:29:48 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Looks like we have the "hearts and minds" of the american people.
2 posted on 09/10/2003 6:32:10 AM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
Looks like we have the "hearts and minds" of the american people.

More like their butts as in protecting your own butt.

3 posted on 09/10/2003 6:34:02 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
With the exception of California's new (Democrat inspired/RINO-approved) assinine 'drivers licenses for national border violators'.

11% of new illegal immigrants coming into California from Mexico are NON LATINO, (i.e. not from Mexico, Central or South America). They are from all over the place, knowing of the porous nature. How many of these may be terrorists? What the hell is Dept of Homeland Security doing about this?

4 posted on 09/10/2003 6:35:03 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Saddam Had No Taepodong-II nuke ICBMs capable of hitting the World's Largest & 2nd Largest Economies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Why come thru Mexico when they can waltz across Canadian border ?
5 posted on 09/10/2003 6:37:44 AM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
This one is for the future bumber sticker mentality

"Compared to before September 11, 2001, do you think the country today is safer from terrorism or less safe from terrorism?"


 
Safer Less
Safe
No
Difference
(vol.)
No
Opinion
 
% % % %  
9/03 67 27 4 2

6 posted on 09/10/2003 6:38:43 AM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
2 out of 3 think Rumsfeld is doing a great job; this certainly bodes ill for ninnies like Howard Dean.
7 posted on 09/10/2003 6:42:17 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Its only a short trek to the DMV Office in National City, from the border.
8 posted on 09/10/2003 6:42:39 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Saddam Had No Taepodong-II nuke ICBMs capable of hitting the World's Largest & 2nd Largest Economies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
These stats show the nine dwarves haven't made much headway with average Americans. To that extent, it's very, very good news for the Bush Administration.

If I had been asked to respond to these questions, I would have answered similarly.

9 posted on 09/10/2003 6:47:11 AM PDT by Trust but Verify (Will work for W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
    Excellent/
Good
Not So
Good/
Poor
No
Opinion
      % % %
Preventing further terrorist attacks in the United States 80 19 1

.

Did I miss an attack? Who is the 20% who are morons?

10 posted on 09/10/2003 6:47:37 AM PDT by smith288 ("The key to our success will be your execution." -Scott Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
There is a CLEAR overall decline in the support level of President Bush and a CLEAR rise in the opposition level. Just as I thought it would go when thinking back in October 2001 and knowing the short term/impatient national characteristic of Americans.

The dip in support is running at 30% in two years or 15% per annum.

Projecting this trend, if things did not improve in the next year, around the time of the general election debates between Bush and his Democratic Rival (Fall 2004), we would see a Bush support level drop to 52% and an Bush opposed level rise to the mid-40%s. If the undecided swing 'wanted something new' as many impatient, uninformed Americans always do every four years rather than staying the course, that could tighten the race further. Demogoguery by the Dems, with this close of conflicting opinions, could make the election just as close as Bush-Gore. They might rely on hanging chads again to bail their asses out. Don't count the chickens yet.

11 posted on 09/10/2003 6:49:27 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Saddam Had No Taepodong-II nuke ICBMs capable of hitting the World's Largest & 2nd Largest Economies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
We are safer from terrorism, but not because of Homeland Security, CIA, FBI, or any other government sponsored effort. We are safer because a singnificant number of (if not all) Americans will no longer go quietly to their deaths.
12 posted on 09/10/2003 6:49:37 AM PDT by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Projecting past trends to the future is full of speculative assumptions. One of which is that the president has no plan to elevate his approval rating by campaigning as the time gets closer.
13 posted on 09/10/2003 6:57:42 AM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
We are safer because a singnificant number of (if not all) Americans will no longer go quietly to their deaths.

Which is exemplified by our willingness to take it the battle from our back yard to the terrorists back yard.

14 posted on 09/10/2003 6:59:02 AM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
....while fighting in the backyard, we left all the doors and windows open in our house.


Open borders with 4000 - 6000 slithering through every 24 hours (these are the ones that "got away") does not a secure country make.
15 posted on 09/10/2003 7:14:38 AM PDT by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
When you run Bush numbers against another candidate rather than against these issues, he does much better. Against Dean he kicks butt.
16 posted on 09/10/2003 7:19:50 AM PDT by RichGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death
Open borders with 4000 - 6000 slithering through every 24 hours (these are the ones that "got away") does not a secure country make.

You can stay secure in your house with bars on the doors and windows and cower in the basement in fear that the big bad boogy man will get you.

I'd rather let the sun shine in and go slay the boogy man.

17 posted on 09/10/2003 7:37:06 AM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RichGuy

Time/CNN Poll conducted by Harris Interactive. Sept. 3-4, 2003. N=883 registered voters nationwide. MoE ± 3.3.

.

“If George W. Bush runs for reelection in 2004, would you say you will definitely vote for him, might vote for or against him, or will you definitely vote against him?”

Definitely
For
Might
Vote For
Or Against
Definitely
Against
Not
S
ure
% % % %

9/03

29 25 41 5

.

"Suppose the 2004 election for president were being held today and you had to choose between [see below], the Democrat, and George W. Bush, the Republican. For whom would you vote: [see below]?"

George
W. Bush
John
Kerry
Not
Sure
% % %

9/03

50 45 5
12/02 56 39 5

.

George
W. Bush
Joseph
Lieberman
Not
Sure
% % %

9/03

50 44 6
12/02 55 39 6

.

George
W. Bush
Howard
Dean
Not
Sure
% % %

9/03

52 42 6

.

George
W. Bush
Dick
Gephardt
Not
Sure
% % %

9/03

53 42 5

.

“Now suppose Hillary Rodham Clinton were to run for the Democratic nomination for president. Suppose the 2004 election for president were being held today, and you had to choose between Hillary Rodham Clinton, the Democrat, and George W. Bush, the Republican. For whom would you vote, Clinton or Bush?”

George
W. Bush
Hillary
Rodham
Clinton
Not
Sure
% % %

9/03

50 47 3

18 posted on 09/10/2003 7:38:06 AM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
He can certainly try, but the deck will be stacked against him with these variables, if in place:

further decay of US military position in nation-building exercise in Iraq/continued US media harping and melodrama/American impatience, short-termed vision and only supporting quick, short term dramatic victories, not long-drawn out commitments

19 posted on 09/10/2003 7:39:01 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Saddam Had No Taepodong-II nuke ICBMs capable of hitting the World's Largest & 2nd Largest Economies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
The current problems in Iraq will be mostly forgotten by then just as the similar problems and complaints about Afghanistan have been forgotten.
20 posted on 09/10/2003 7:41:52 AM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson