Posted on 09/03/2003 8:39:43 PM PDT by Valin
It took a few minutes for leaders of the Bisexual, Gay & Lesbian Alliance at Rutgers University to realize something was wrong at their back-to-school meeting.
The hall was full of unfamiliar students wanting to become members. Most were carrying Bibles with markers in the first chapter of St. Paul's Epistle to the Romans. They also had copies of the campus policy forbidding discrimination on the basis of "race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, age, sex, sexual orientation, disability, marital or veteran status."
Truth is, this scene hasn't happened at Rutgers or anywhere else — so far.
What if it did? What if conservative Christians tried to rush a gay-rights group and elect new leaders? What if, when told they couldn't join because they rejected its core beliefs, evangelicals cited cases in which Christian groups were punished for refusing leadership roles to homosexuals? What if, when jeered by angry homosexuals, evangelicals called this verbal violence rooted in religious bigotry and, thus, harassment?
"No, no, no. I have never heard of a case in which conservative Catholics, Protestants or Jews tried to turn the tables in this fashion," said historian Alan Charles Kors, president of the Philadelphia-based Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) "That would never happen. There is an inherent meekness ... among students of faith on all these campuses. It's so ironic that people call them intolerant and offensive. Most of these religious students are among the last people who would ever go where they are not wanted. All they want is to be free to express their beliefs."
But there have been a growing number of cases in which traditional religious groups have been attacked because their "intolerant" beliefs and policies offend modern academia. Almost all of these cases are collisions between ancient moral doctrines and campus policies that defend and promote the sexual revolution.
The bottom line, according to recent FIRE legal guides, is that almost all campus policies that inhibit religious practices also inhibit the constitutional rights of free speech, association and assembly. Public colleges and universities are not supposed to make doctrinal decisions that deny privileges to some religious groups that are then extended to other secular or religious groups.
Yet that is what is happening.
"Religious liberty is now center stage in the battle for freedom on campus," according to David French, a Harvard Law School graduate who wrote the manual covering disputes over faith issues. "Religious students are particularly convenient targets. After all, they think and behave in ways that many other students don't understand; they tend to be small minorities on most campuses; and — by religious conviction — they often resist even the most heavy-handed repression."
For all of their talk about "diversity" and "tolerance," French is convinced many academic leaders think that "the fewer 'fanatics' — of the 'wrong' kind — the better."
While these campus disputes are often described in terms of "left" and "right," the FIRE project (www.thefireguides. -
org) has been endorsed by a diverse coalition of activists ranging from Edwin Meese III, attorney general in the Reagan administration, to American Civil Liberties Union President Nadine Strossen.
The key is that academic leaders must be honest, said French. Leaders at state schools are quickly learning that their work is covered by explicit laws that ban any "viewpoint discrimination" that blesses some believers and curses others. Religious schools, meanwhile, are allowed to require particular beliefs and practices — mandatory chapel, moral codes, doctrinal statements for faculty — if these rules are clearly stated in writing.
Right now, the toughest battles are at some of America's most prestigious private colleges and universities. These secular schools once encouraged fierce debates and proudly tolerated dissent. But now, it seems that some world views are created more equal than others.
Many religious believers do not discover this reality until they arrive on campus and receive copies of the all-powerful student handbook.
"Students must be told the truth," said French. "They should not be duped into believing that they have enrolled in a school that respects their beliefs and their freedom to express viewpoints that are out of the so-called mainstream. These secular schools must be more honest in their recruiting materials and catalogs. This is a truth-in-advertising issue."
Terry Mattingly (www.tmatt.net) teaches at Palm Beach Atlantic University and is senior fellow for journalism at the Council for Christian Colleges & Universities.
The hall was full of unfamiliar students wanting to become members. Most were carrying Bibles with markers in the first chapter of St. Paul's Epistle to the Romans. They also had copies of the campus policy forbidding discrimination on the basis of "race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, age, sex, sexual orientation, disability, marital or veteran status."
Truth is, this scene hasn't happened at Rutgers or anywhere else — so far.
Hint hint
Thanks for the input!
About 3 years ago at Villanova University in PA, Charlton Heston had been invited to speak by a pro-gun student group. The campus Leftists called a meeting to discuss how to deal with this and to organize protests.
They didn't notice how well attended their meeting was.
The word had gotten out to members of Second AMendment Sisters and other pro-2A groups. Members arrived by ones and twos and took up seats dispersed thru the auditorium. When it came down to floor discussion, and a couple of 2A supporters started to share their views, the organizers on the podium started indicated to the two rent-a-cops in the back to eject one. He called out "Will all Second Amendment supporters in the audience please stand up and be counted?". About a hundred of us stood up. We were over a third of the audience (most of the rest were bored students order to attend by their profs).
The two rent a cops went back to their donuts, and things went downhill for the gun control people from there
This will continue as long as the Leftists can raise hell, march around and break things, and nobody is willing to stand up to them. As long as there is not pressure from the other side, it's just the path of least resistance for the campus administration to give in to them.
The problem will come as increasing numbers get annoyed at the heavy-handed tactics. In the absence of any moderate opposition, anybody who comes along who displays a willingness to oppose them will get support from those who are fed up.
But then you had to pop the bubble...
Ah, tolerance...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.