Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The U.S.T.A. Needs to Ditch the Babes (Kournikovas are bad for women's tennis)
The New York Times ^ | August 28, 2003 | SELENA ROBERTS

Posted on 08/28/2003 6:53:53 AM PDT by presidio9

NLY one forbidden Russian could pout her way into the hearts of middle-age men seeking a Kevin Spacey moment amid the "American Beauty" rose petals.

Only one sassy diva would respond to a marriage proposal from a teenage fan panting among the Clearasil crowd by sneering, "You couldn't afford me."

There is only one Anna Kournikova. As one of the first downloadable darlings of the Internet, as the savior of a once glam-challenged Tour, as the mystery blonde from Moscow, Anna will never be duplicated.

To all the player agents who believe they've Got Next, to all the officials looking to replicate the Tour's Rapunzel with a Daniela Hantuchova or a Maria Sharapova or an American supernova, they should get ova it.

"I think people should stop looking for a babe," Jelena Dokic said.

After all, babes don't make the audience; the audience makes the babes.

For tennis fans, a winning personality and a personality that wins make the ultimate aphrodisiac. Who is more beloved? The Andre Agassi of streaked mane or the one with the head of an Airstream trailer? Who was more attractive? The cold Chrissie Evert of her youth or the gracious, mature one of her prime?

In the absence of the injured Williams sisters, the United States Tennis Association, up to its corporate collars in demographics, is trying to manufacture attraction by placing all the blond bombs on the show courts at the United States Open.

Only a few folks fell for it when the unseeded Ashley Harkleroad - billed as the American Anna by Us magazine before she became the first junior girl to appear at Arthur Ashe Stadium in 2001 - landed on the marquee court again yesterday for her second-round match.

In front of dozens, the 18-year-old Harkleroad blew up at the umpire during her loss to Vera Zvonareva.

This was not the close-up of a marketing dream. This was not the way to grow the game, either. Expanding the sport doesn't begin with middle-age suburban cyberfellas going gaga over another Anna; it begins with a tennis audience the Williams sisters have just begun to tap into.

Miss them, don't you? Polarizing but always entertaining, Serena and Venus Williams have made themselves impossible to ignore. "You can't win either way with us," Serena Williams said yesterday.

She is wrong, for once. Tennis wins with them. This is what is so confounding about the U.S.T.A. and the WTA. After a recent study for the national tennis association about participation levels in tennis in the United States, officials discovered that one out of every three new players is either African-American or Hispanic. Also, 75 percent of all recreational players chase balls on a public court.

What a coincidence: Venus and Serena are African-American, and they began playing on public courts. And yet the U.S.T.A. fails to reflect its own findings by presenting Harkleroad with show-court appearances for two years, while another rising 18-year-old American, Angela Haynes, made her United States Open debut on Court 11 on Tuesday.

Like the Williams sisters, Haynes is beautiful and smart and out of Compton, Calif. Also like Serena and Venus, she is public-court talent who happens to be black. The daily double, according to the U.S.T.A.'s own research.

"Tennis is still an upper-class sport," Haynes's father, Fred, said in a telephone interview on Tuesday. "You still have racism in how it's run, but they can't be that out front about it. So they make sure you don't get what the next Anna Kournikova gets, like exposure. Yes, Anna is pretty. Yes, she's blond. That's what the world wants in its stereotype of beauty.

"Everyone wants pretty - and to me, there are all kinds of pretty - but people also love good tennis. That's what it should be about."

It should be, but it's not. In fact, the WTA may become just as culpable as the U.S.T.A. for a move toward exploiting its blond roots, particularly given the Tour chief Larry Scott's comments about age eligibility.

Created to prevent child-star burnout (see Jennifer Capriati's dark period), the rule restricting how many events players can enter between the ages of 14 and 18 could be relaxed soon. Not coincidentally, the telegenic Sharapova is 16. As Scott said earlier this week, "Times change."

This is code for: we're desperate. Knowing what suckers crowds are for pixies, the Tour could be flirting with a slippery slope if its strategy is to revive its growth through the promotion of Lolitas.

Only one young Russian has enough pouty appeal to make the ratings leap with her all-"American Beauty." There is only one Anna.

Who else could be so popular in absentia? Neither a career devoid of victories nor years of injuries to Kournikova have slowed the churn of the search engines. For the week ending Aug. 23, Lycos placed her at No. 20 for most Web visits per subject, right behind the Blaster Worm at No. 19 but ahead of Christina Aguilera at No. 22.

Who else can claim such company? There are many who would like to slip into Anna's celebrity skin, but the search for the new Anna should end. The sport's growth is in its diversity, not blond ambitions.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Miscellaneous; Philosophy; US: New York
KEYWORDS: annakournikova; billyjeanking; danielahantuchova; harkleroad; hotsweatytennisbabes; jelenadokic; losetheyankmeesgear; mmmmtasty; onlydykeswatchdykes; youcouldntaffordme; yummmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

The injured Anna Kournikova has lots of time these days for non-tennis activities, like throwing out the first ball Wednesday night at Yankee Stadium.

I can't help wondering what Selena Roberts looks like, but I can guarantee you I wouldn't pay money to watch her play tennis.

1 posted on 08/28/2003 6:53:54 AM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9
The NY Times hates beautiful women.

That's how Mo Dowd got her job.

2 posted on 08/28/2003 6:55:44 AM PDT by dead (Perdicaris alive or Raisuli dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Expanding the sport doesn't begin with middle-age suburban cyberfellas going gaga over another Anna...

Hey! I resent that!
I'm a young, rural cyberfella.

3 posted on 08/28/2003 6:57:02 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
During batting practice yesterday at Yankee stadium, the CWS spotted Anna in the stands, anmd the entire team stampeded over to where she was sitting.....they then proceeded totake out their sexual frustration by walloping David Wells and the Yankees..
4 posted on 08/28/2003 6:59:12 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Selena's attractive for her age..BTW, in case you forgot, she was Julius Erving's squeeze, back when Selena covered the NBA, and she and the Doctor produced Alexandra Stephenson....
5 posted on 08/28/2003 7:00:39 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9; Poohbah; Chancellor Palpatine; BOBTHENAILER; Grampa Dave; Howlin; Miss Marple
Selena Roberts is probably jealous, and I seriously doubt she will EVER crack the Maxim Hot 100.
6 posted on 08/28/2003 7:01:50 AM PDT by hchutch (The National League needs to adopt the designated hitter rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
Think Martha Burk. She looks like a dowager.
7 posted on 08/28/2003 7:02:37 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Alexandra Stevenson's mother is Samantha Stevenson, not Selena Roberts.
8 posted on 08/28/2003 7:04:18 AM PDT by writmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
I'll take your word for it. Either way, she's pandering to the "I hate her because she's beautiful" crowd. If we are going to have sexual segregation in sports, then the attractiveness of the female players will always be a subject of interest to the men.
9 posted on 08/28/2003 7:04:24 AM PDT by presidio9 (Run Al Run!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Like the Williams sisters, Haynes is beautiful...

Halle Barry is beautiful...the Williams sisters are...ummmm, uh...well, they don't turn many heads.

10 posted on 08/28/2003 7:05:32 AM PDT by Sangamon Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Sad. Only one gratuitous photo and an unrevealing one at that.

Anna is great for women's tennis. Since Martina and Chrissie left the scene, it's been a pretty boring sport...Anna is the only reason to watch now

11 posted on 08/28/2003 7:06:38 AM PDT by Cosmo (Liberalism is for girls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch

Ashley Harkleroad

12 posted on 08/28/2003 7:07:21 AM PDT by presidio9 (Run Al Run!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sangamon Kid
Halle Barry is beautiful...the Williams sisters are...ummmm, uh...well, they don't turn many heads.

You said it. The idea that the Williams Sisters are in any way attractive is politically correct nonsense. There are plenty of beautiful black women in the world. Venus and Serena are not among them.

13 posted on 08/28/2003 7:09:14 AM PDT by presidio9 (Run Al Run!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Harkleroad? HARKLEROAD! That name is the kiss of death. Change the name, and she might make it.
14 posted on 08/28/2003 7:09:29 AM PDT by Sangamon Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
In the absence of the injured Williams sisters, the United States Tennis Association, up to its corporate collars in demographics, is trying to manufacture attraction by placing all the blond bombs on the show courts at the United States Open.

Frankly, women's tennis will be far more interesting and entertaining WITHOUT the Williams sisters.

15 posted on 08/28/2003 7:10:10 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
Anyone who thinks that men are going to watch womens sports when the competitors are comprised of bull dykes is out of their mind.

The real issue is that the bull dykes who have better abilities are resentfull of Anna (and those like her) because she gets the attention and the big dollar endorsements. There was massive grumbling among the female tennis players when Anna had that investment company deal with those commercials. They didn't like a very marginal player getting all the attention and money.

As one of Rush's undeniable truths of life says, feminism was created to allow unattractive women better access to the mainstream.

16 posted on 08/28/2003 7:10:15 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Yet another bitter, whiny woman angry at Anna K. for being beautiful.
17 posted on 08/28/2003 7:10:16 AM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
As a man who fancies black women (actually all women) I find one of the sisters to be very attractive. I just don't know which one she is!
18 posted on 08/28/2003 7:11:55 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Whether Selena Roberts likes it or not, Kournikova actually got her ranking as high as #8 in the world in 2000 and was on the #1 ranked doubles team in 1999.

Sure, she's known for her looks and she never won a singles tournament, but for a short time she was playing competitive tennis at a very high level.

19 posted on 08/28/2003 7:11:55 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
You cannot be serious man!
20 posted on 08/28/2003 7:12:59 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson