Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JUST HOW BAD WERE LIBERALS IN THE SIXTIES ? WORSE THAN ANY COULD HAVE IMAGINED .....
8/24/03 | cousinkoala

Posted on 08/24/2003 12:57:18 AM PDT by cousinkoala

Just how bad were theliberals in the sixties ? Worse than any could have imagined .

Former liberal turned Reagan Conservative , writer Author David Horowitz grew up in the sixties as a radical liberal activist and friend of radical Democrat Tom Hayden , future Demacrat Senator , 1996 Los Angeles Mayoral candidate against Richard Riordan , and husband of Jane Fonda .

As a friend of Mr . Hayden during the anti - Vietnam war era , David Horowitz reaveals in his book 'Radical Son ' that Tom Hayden actively ,literally , and personally trained the VietCong how to conduct Psychological warfare against our own U.S. troops in Vietnam . Had war been declared by Congress , Tom Hayden would have been tried for treason .

So how is it that Mr. Hayden could run for Los Angeles Mayor in 1996 and this not be revealed during the mayoral campaign ? This is anyone's guess .

So what is the point of this short but revealing expose' on Radical Democrat California Senator Tom Hayden , former husband of Jane Fonda ? For those who love America , be ever vigilant , and know your enemy . Do not be naive . These Psuedo-Americans ( friends of our enemies ) are out there now waging psychological warfare in election campaigns and off years , and they have not changed their stripes , as we have seen from Congressman Democrat Dick Gephardt's attack on President Bush and our men in uniform in Iraq . Thier constant carping and caterwalling against all good things Republican reveal themselves as nothing more than immature children in adult bodies who never learned to grow up out of the ME generation of the sixties . Thier mentors are such people as brain damaging drug use promoters such as David Crosby of Crosby Stills , Nash , and Young rock ' n ' Roll fame who was qouted on a ' rockumentary ' saying , " We wanted to take the people out of the fifties ..." in thier promotion of thier music and drug use .

David Crosby in recent times had been looking for a liver donor . You see , thel ost and fallen man destroyed his liver with alchoholism . Maybe this would not have happened had he left the 50's alone .

Remember the difference between a liberal and a Conservative . A liberal is an ideologue who believes in attaining his goal through any means ( 'any means to an end ') : lying , cheating , racebaiting , classwarfare , and the transfer of wealth These are typixcal Socialist - communist methods . A Conservative is one who wishes to work , achieve , worship God , and be with his friends .

Dear friends , be ever vigilant and courageous .

Love , cousinkoala


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: California; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2004; candidates; davidhorowitz; democrat; eelection; hayden; liberals; mayor; psychological; radicalson; sixties; tom; warfare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

1 posted on 08/24/2003 12:57:19 AM PDT by cousinkoala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DesertGOP; ALOHA RONNIE
Ronnie and Rick , here is another post written your fellow freedom fighter for Vietnam , cousinkoala
2 posted on 08/24/2003 1:03:07 AM PDT by cousinkoala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cousinkoala
There is an old saying...

if you are not a Liberal by the time you are 20...
you have no heart...

If you are not a Conservative by the time you reach 40...
you have no mind!!

1965 was nexus of baby-boomers becoming liberal...

not to mention good, cheap and plentiful Mexican Marijuanua...

we were all getting laid and feeling superior....

then reality kicked in and the USA was considered a joke!

The real reason for Viet-Nam was to prove to the Soviets we had the will to fight and bury our boys and keep on fighting....

it sucks, but it had to be done.

It was instrumental in having them fall into their own quagmire in Afghanastan in 1980...

after they ate enough shit, they quit and the rest is history...

which is the winning of the "Cold War!!"

3 posted on 08/24/2003 1:09:16 AM PDT by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cousinkoala
JUST HOW BAD WERE LIBERALS IN THE SIXTIES ? WORSE THAN ANY COULD HAVE IMAGINED .....

I don't know, I was born in the early 60's and thankfully wasn't exposed to those liberals

4 posted on 08/24/2003 1:15:23 AM PDT by Mo1 (http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Guess what? They're the same guys and gals, just grown gray. They're as insane now as they were then.
5 posted on 08/24/2003 1:27:24 AM PDT by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cousinkoala
I grew up in the '60s. I met Tom Hayden. I thought he was intolerant and self-righteous. But the author of this article has the same faults and is stupid as well. A simple example

David Crosby in recent times had been looking for a liver donor . You see , the lost and fallen man destroyed his liver with alchoholism . Maybe this would not have happened had he left the 50's alone.

Alcolholism is the fault of '60s ideology? How ignorant can you be? The rest of the article is no better.

6 posted on 08/24/2003 1:34:06 AM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
They're as insane now as they were then.

Hmmmm .. I wonder if they'll let the government pick their nursing home?

7 posted on 08/24/2003 1:38:31 AM PDT by Mo1 (http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cousinkoala
They weren't "Liberal" in the 1960s -- they were overtly socialist and communist (waving communist flags, rallying to KGB run protests - like Comrades Clinton and Talbott, you name it). Heck the "Yippies" stood for the Youth International Party -- communists. They have "gone soft" by becoming what we know as the modern "Liberal" -- going from followers of Lenin, Ho, Mao, and Castro to followers of Gramsci, Alinsky, and before he was ousted fawning all over Gorbachev.
8 posted on 08/24/2003 1:39:20 AM PDT by CaptIsaacDavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
Ping!!
9 posted on 08/24/2003 1:47:58 AM PDT by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
I don't know, I was born in the early 60's and thankfully wasn't exposed to those liberals

Yet you've heard their music, you've watched their films, you've read their newsprint, and you've paid taxes for their programs.

10 posted on 08/24/2003 1:53:55 AM PDT by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
"Guess what? They're the same guys and gals, just grown gray. They're as insane now as they were then."

Yes. And they have risen to power within all the most important institutions in our nation, destroying and corrupting every one they infiltrated.

We are now in an all out war about what will be the ideology of the US. They will not stop destroying until they remake this nation in their own image. Althogh socialism and fascism always fail, they really believe that they are the messiahs that will make it work in the US. This is as much of a crisis as was the time preceeding the Civil War.

Anyone that doesn't see it is not looking hard enough or is part of the problem.


11 posted on 08/24/2003 3:24:49 AM PDT by At _War_With_Liberals (If Hillary ever takes the oath of office, she will be the last President the US will ever have. -RR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cousinkoala
The 60s were one of the most disgusting periods in America's history!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
12 posted on 08/24/2003 3:26:29 AM PDT by Highest Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cousinkoala
The LAT has a sorry history of spiking or under-reporting stories. That's why exposure of their dishonest reporting tactics here so infuriated them. The copyright issue was a transparent ploy, made so a corrupt federal district judge could offer some lame pretense of justification for her strike at FR.

IMHO
13 posted on 08/24/2003 3:40:11 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: At _War_With_Liberals
Guess what else...

We are in the year 2003 still living with WWII Veterans. That generation is not even gone! We will be living with these individuals for the rest of our lives!
14 posted on 08/24/2003 4:07:09 AM PDT by Samurai_Jack (get used to it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cousinkoala
Welcome Home Brother
15 posted on 08/24/2003 5:07:09 AM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (Never Forget Those Who Are Not Accounted For)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nitro
"The real reason for Viet-Nam was to prove to the Soviets we had the will to fight and bury our boys and keep on fighting."

From a Must Visit Site
Vipers Vietnam Veterans Page, A Vietnam Veteran & Proud Web Site
About Vietnam

The Vietnam war was the longest in our nation's history. Two American advisors were killed on July 8, 1959, and the last casualties in connection with the war occurred on May 15, 1975, during the Mayaquez incident. Approximately 2.7 million Americans served in the war zone; 300,000 were wounded and approximately 75,000 permanently disabled. Officially there are still 1,991 Americans unaccounted for from SE Asia.

Vietnam was a savage, in your face war where death could and did strike from anywhere with absolutely no warning. The brave young men and women who fought that war paid an awful price of blood, pain and suffering. As it is said: "ALL GAVE SOME ... SOME GAVE ALL"
The Vietnam war was not lost on the battlefield. No American force in ANY other conflict fought with more determination or sheer courage than the Vietnam Veteran.  For the first time in our history America sent it's young men and women into a war run by inept politicians who had no grasp of military strategies and no moral will to win. They were led by "top brass" who were concerned mainly with furthering their own careers, most neither understood the nature of the war nor had a clue about the impossible mission with which they'd tasked their soldiers.  And the war was reported by a self serving Media who penned stories filled with inaccuracies, deliberate omissions, biased presentations and blatant distorted interpretations because they were more interested in a story than the truth! It can be debated that we should never have fought that war. It can also be argued that the young Americans who fought so courageously, never losing a single major battle, helped in a huge way to WIN THE COLD WAR.

16 posted on 08/24/2003 5:17:41 AM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (Never Forget Those Who Are Not Accounted For)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: At _War_With_Liberals
You are right. There is a war in this country now. These people took over the universities without a peep until it was to late. They took over the entire education system. They have taken over the government bureaucracy. They have taken over most of the churches. They are about 40% of the population. Now as we fight the most threatening war I can think of, they control most of the press and are undermining and trying to destroy our President. They are too smart to try to do the same to the military as that might rouse the sleeping giant in this country. It is truly scary, these days. I don't know who will win. I really don't.
17 posted on 08/24/2003 5:32:54 AM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cousinkoala
>>...Just how bad were theliberals in the sixties ...<<

If you can remember the sixties, you weren't really there.

18 posted on 08/24/2003 5:47:42 AM PDT by FReepaholic (My other tag line is hilarious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
Great website. Here's another good quote from the site:

"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions, blood and lives of better men than himself. "

19 posted on 08/24/2003 5:51:13 AM PDT by FReepaholic (My other tag line is hilarious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
AMEN
20 posted on 08/24/2003 5:55:34 AM PDT by Gone_Postal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson