Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drug Fix
The American Prowler ^ | 8/21/2003 | R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr.

Posted on 08/22/2003 11:20:34 AM PDT by TBP

Before attending to this week's business I should like to defend myself from the machotypes who fell on me for saying in last week's column that a .30 caliber Weatherby magnum was capable of reaching a bird at 1200 yards. Allow me to quote from a memo to AmSpec's expert on the subject, my friend Chuck Fowler.

Quoth: "A 165-grain bullet from a 30-378 Weatherby drops nineteen and a half inches at 500 yards. It screams out of the barrel at a blistering 3500 feet per second. I'm sure at 1200 yards it may drop twice again as much as at 500 yards and maybe even more. But once a scoped gun is zeroed for 1200 yards, a person of modest ability can easily hit a human-sized target. A person with some skill could hit a bird, and no one with good sense would bet his life on it not being possible to hit him."

I stand by my statement but remain a bird lover, particularly Wild Turkey.

******

Washington -- I write as a confirmed hypochondriac. I have more medicines in my medicine cabinet than Arianna Huffington. In fact, I have more medicine cabinets than Arianna Huffington, and I did not even have to divorce a multimillionaire to afford my multitudes of medicine cabinets. I have a half dozen personal physicians. The only docs I avoid are plastic surgeons, and that is because they would have me looking like Senator John Pierre Kerry.

Thus you might think I am exultant over the advance of the new prescription drug bills through Congress that our solons plan to append to Medicare. Actually, I am not. As these bills approach the conference committee where they will be reconciled, I reach for the Prozac. They are unfunded. They are likely to lack market-based reforms. They will force all of us into a healthcare straitjacket. We hypochondriacs need to be able to make choices. What strikes me as an unendurable affliction might strike you as a hangnail. Yet I might want to take my hangnail to a doctor and I ought to be able to, assuming I pay for it. With a proper array of healthcare programs available to me I just might be able to get insurance for my hangnails.

The basic thing that all of us, hypochondriacs and the physically fit alike, need to remember about health policy is a condition that the great economist Milton Friedman recognized a generation or more ago, to wit: healthcare demand is elastic. The cheaper and more available it is the more it will be in demand. If it were free, we hypochondriacs would be in the doctor's office all the time. At least we would be in the doctor's office if the doc's fees were paid by government -- and if government did not regulate care, thus restricting procedures.

The restriction of procedures is just one of the problems with Medicare. The other is that it is underfunded and will go bust someday. Scholars at the American Enterprise Institute calculate that Medicare's long-term shortfall is more than $30 trillion. If the contemplated prescription drug coverage is thrown in, add another $6 trillion to $12 trillion. And still I cannot get my hangnails treated. As the shortfall mounts ordinary Americans will not be able to get some genuinely urgent procedures covered. In fact, services are being cut back even now. In the years to come there will be more cutbacks in Medicare and a huge tax increase.

The government cannot run unfunded programs forever. Yet with the present prescription drug bills now headed for conference that is about what the politicians are contemplating. To repeat, the unspoken truth of these prescription-care bills is that they are not even funded.

The Bush Administration until recently included market-based reforms in its plans for prescription-drug legislation. Now it has apparently thrown in the towel. Senator Edward Kennedy is opposed to such measures. Of course, any market-based reforms can be expected to rouse Kennedy's ire. He wants to move towards a single-payer health system whose proper name is socialism. Any policy that further damages Medicare he believes will put further pressure on the government for his quaint 1930s goal.

Actually the government already has a solution to the healthcare muddle, but it is only available to members of Congress and government employees, namely, Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP). In its 28 years, FEHBP's costs have been no greater than Medicare's and its benefits are more extensive. Even a hypochondriac can admire it.

Under FEHBP the government's Office of Personnel Management annually sends out a memo to health insurance providers, outlining goals and soliciting each company to put together plans consistent with those goals. The plans that meet the government's minimum standards are offered to government employees who can then select the policy of their choice. Furthermore, employees can negotiate with the companies as to which options are included in their personal policy. I would want the hangnail option. Thus my policy might cost a bit more than Senator Kennedy's though he ought to take the weight-watcher's option. The government then agrees to pay between 72% and 75% of the policy premium.

FEHBP has wide acceptance among health specialists and healthcare providers. Frankly I cannot understand why Republicans and Democrats cannot agree on extending it beyond government employees to the rest of us. The only reasons I can ascertain are that A) Republicans are not up to the political fight, and B) Democrats are holding out so as to move national healthcare towards socialism and away from market reforms. By now it is pretty clear that today's reactionaries are with Senator Kennedy.

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. is the editor in chief of The American Spectator, an Adjunct Fellow at the Hudson Institute, and a contributing editor to the New York Sun. This column appears with the Sun's permission.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: bush; drugs; giveaways; gop; prescriptions; remmetttyrrelljr; republicans; seniors; welfare
Real conservatives should oppose prescription drug giveaways for Bill Gates and other future seniors. It's kust more socialism. Why is Bush endorsing it?
1 posted on 08/22/2003 11:20:34 AM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TBP
"Why is Bush endorsing it?"

Great question.

Its time to cancel his credit cards.
2 posted on 08/22/2003 11:24:09 AM PDT by opusprime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
I am not opposed adding the benefit (means tested) to medicare for the reason that drugs have become a major part of medical care. however, I do not believe that the cost can possibly be absorbed by government now or in the foreseeable future.

It could be done if they could find the funding through cuts or eliminations of some other ineffective and practically useless federal programs.

That is the reality of it.

3 posted on 08/22/2003 11:30:32 AM PDT by Cold Heat (Nothing in my home is French!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
I wish we could just get the government entirely out the of healthcare business. Then I would like to get the government out of the indroctination (er...education) buisness. Then...
4 posted on 08/22/2003 11:30:47 AM PDT by theartfuldodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
Because the Dems will win with this issue and the great majority is getting older.
Even Rush said before that as the majority of Americans get older they will vote their desires in as law and will oppress the young with over taxation.

I expect the young will grow to love euthanasia!

I agree it is a horrible give away and the country is selfish enough to vote out any party who won't support it at this time.

Putting a hand out and taking is just too easy these days TBP.

You are right though and in spirit I agree with you.
5 posted on 08/22/2003 11:31:25 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
Why is Bush endorsing it?

You're looking at it all wrong. It's not about getting pills to seniors, it's about getting tax dollars to the pharmaceuticals. It all makes sense when you look at it properly.

6 posted on 08/22/2003 11:36:17 AM PDT by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
Like Medicaid? Health care should be taken out of the hands of the Feds; completely. Bush was going to privatize, or ALLOW privatization to some degree which would have begun to loosen the Fed stranglehold on care for the seniors and the poor.

But he caved on this, just like he caved on education. Bad move.

7 posted on 08/22/2003 11:43:50 AM PDT by DLfromthedesert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
"Because the Dems will win with this issue and the great majority is getting older. "

Cop-out alert. If we had real principled "leadership", the issue could be addressed.

When will the growth of the Federal Government cease?
8 posted on 08/22/2003 11:50:10 AM PDT by opusprime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TBP
The Prescription Drug Bills supported by the Bush Administration and soon to be endorsed by Congress is for one simple reason - International competitiveness and free trade! Allivating US Corportations of the competitive disadvantage posed by Medical Care given by almost every other government will provide a higher bottom line for profits and at the same time make our products more competitive in the world marketplace. This Drug Bill is a limited benefit for only retirees and not a sweeping Drug Bill aimed at really leveling the interanational trade playing field.

Corporate Profits and International Trade are the reason. This Bill/Benefit may make US Trade Partners understand this Republican Administration's commitment to Free Trade and they must be weeping to see US companies given this economic (fairness) incentive. European Trade Partners will continue to enjoy a distince corporate advantage due to the complete medical coverage provided by their governments to society at large, however, the US is eroding that last area in which we have never competed against them economically.

9 posted on 08/22/2003 11:50:39 AM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DLfromthedesert
Bush did not cave on ED.

He got what he could get. The alternative was nothing.

I fully expect the missing pieces(school closing regs and vouchers) to be added to the mix during the second term.

Medicare is not going away. In view of that, we must find efficiencies and ways to keep financial limits on the program while improving some of the services.

Drugs were never anticipated to be so important in health-care. They are now.

Tort reforms, insurance pools and other things that the rats fight like dogs against must be passed to reduce costs.

I think it will happen if we increase our majority in congress. The only way that will happen is to get votes from the growing senior voting block. That is why the drugs are a big issue.

10 posted on 08/22/2003 11:54:55 AM PDT by Cold Heat (Nothing in my home is French!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: opusprime
The problem is deeper than the leadership, I'm afraid the people themselves are getting worse.

I don't agree with it and believe that there should be opposition to that though.
11 posted on 08/22/2003 12:03:25 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TBP
Before attending to this week's business I should like to defend myself from the machotypes who fell on me for saying in last week's column that a .30 caliber Weatherby magnum was capable of reaching a bird at 1200 yards. Allow me to quote from a memo to AmSpec's expert on the subject, my friend Chuck Fowler.

Quoth: "A 165-grain bullet from a 30-378 Weatherby drops nineteen and a half inches at 500 yards. It screams out of the barrel at a blistering 3500 feet per second. I'm sure at 1200 yards it may drop twice again as much as at 500 yards and maybe even more. But once a scoped gun is zeroed for 1200 yards, a person of modest ability can easily hit a human-sized target. A person with some skill could hit a bird, and no one with good sense would bet his life on it not being possible to hit him."

Tyrell is a squeaky voiced imbecile and his friend is a fool.

A bullet doesn't drop twice as far at 1200 yards as at 500, but close to 10 times as far.
A shot at a man sized target at 1200 yards takes a master shot. It is something the military spends months teaching snipers, and many cannot learn it at all.
Zeroing in for a range is fine, but in the area of 1200 yards, a change from say 1200 to 1225 will drop the bullet enough more to miss any bird, meaning the range must be known in advance to sight the rifle in to an exact number, not just about.
A change in wind velocity of 1 mph at 1200 yards will blow a bullet too far to the side to hit any bird.

I will be glad to put serious money up if ol' Emmet cares to find someone who can reliably hit the lethal area of a bird, say a 4 inch circle, at around 1200 yards with a Weatherby 30-378.

Carlos Hathcock could probably have done it, but who else?

So9

12 posted on 08/22/2003 12:23:25 PM PDT by Servant of the Nine (A Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Nine
Correct. I can't do the drag calulations in my head, but let's suppose the velocity of a bullet slows enough that it takes two to three seconds to reach 1200 yards (quite a distance for a rifle bullet!).

The problem is that gravity accellerates the bullet toward the ground, that is y=(gt^2)/2, where g is 32f/s^2. Drag, in that direction, can be neglected, since the velocity is relatively slow. In one second, a bullet would fall about 32 feet. In three seconds, about 144 feet, or the height of a 15 storey building.

Some superhuman shooters could maybe use a rifle like an artillery piece, but I ain't one of them.
13 posted on 08/22/2003 1:32:44 PM PDT by eno_ (Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
The problem is deeper than the leadership, I'm afraid the people themselves are getting worse.

No one should be surprised. Socialism has widespread support both from the recipients of Federal handouts and the Federal bureaucrats who administer the programs.

I don't agree with it and believe that there should be opposition to that though.

Hard to do when the commerce clause and general welfare clause is corrupted to empower the Federal government to increase its power and influence.

What makes the task even more difficult is the fact that big government conservatives defend such constitutional contempt.

14 posted on 08/22/2003 1:58:32 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DLfromthedesert
Neocons publicly endorse more social programs and spending. It is ideologically in their philosophy..

Leftists and Neocons unite behind more socialism. This is our main domestic problem now, IMO.

I cannot even see the difference anymore between neocon posters here or leftists when it comes to statism and socialism.

Neocons like Bush use the BS compassionate cons. label to redistribute wealth. Bush just sees the role of God in the nation where true leftists don't.
15 posted on 08/22/2003 3:53:05 PM PDT by At _War_With_Liberals
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
Gimme gimme gimme...
16 posted on 08/22/2003 3:54:33 PM PDT by At _War_With_Liberals
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
Right on target.
17 posted on 08/22/2003 3:56:30 PM PDT by At _War_With_Liberals
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson