Posted on 08/19/2003 9:09:19 AM PDT by Vindiciae Contra TyrannoSCOTUS
Burbank, Calif. -- "I invited Arnold Schwarzenegger to speak to us, but never heard back," Mike Spence, president of the California Republican Assembly (CRA), told members of the state's oldest conservative activist group when they assembled at the Ronald Reagan Library for a luncheon last week
At the two-day CRA convention. that followed at the Burbank Hilton, there was virtually no argument that, no matter how much the media and state GOP establishment insisted that Schwarzenegger was the only Republican with a chance of winning California's special October 7 recall election, the conservative activists of the CRA would not support him.
"I really don't even like Schwarzenegger," said convention chairman Peggy Mew of Los Angeles County. "I mean, what do we really know about him? He's pro-abortion, for gay adoption and gun control, and said he was 'ashamed' of his party's role in the Clinton impeachment. No, I could never vote for him."
For years, the CRA's endorsement in contested Republican primaries has been considered the conservative seal-of-approval in California(see page 17. ). In 1964, the CRA endorsement of Sen. Barry Goldwater's presidential campaign was considered key to his crucial primary victory in the state. In 1966, the CRA endorsed then-actor Ronald Reagan over San Francisco Mayor George Christopher for the Republican gubernatorial nomination. Last year, it helped conservative businessman Bill Simon win the gubernatorial nomination over liberal former Los Angeles Mayor Richard Riordan.
Nonetheless, it was really no surprise that Schwarzenegger, who supported Riordan for governor last year, did not show up at the Burbank Hilton in response to Spence's invitation. Simon and state Sen. Tom McClintock, the two other major Republicans in the recall election, did address the CRA convention, however. Both are conservatives. But this time, the 47-year-old McClintock captured the group's endorsement on a voice vote. Simon's deputy campaign manager Steve Frank downplayed the significance of the endorsement. "Tom has been active in CRA for 20 years," he said, "and Bill has been active only since he got into politics and started running for governor two years ago."
Simon disappointed conservatives last year with what many thought was an unfocused campaign that ended up losing narrowly to the hugely unpopular Davis by 45% to 42%. This year, Simon is back with a new political team, including veteran conservative consultants Wayne Johnson and Tim Clark and communications director K. B. Forbes, who was with the 1996 presidential campaign of Pat Buchanan and the 2000 presidential campaign of Steve Forbes (no relation).
McClintock, one of the most respected conservatives in the state legislature, is running on a platform focusing on three specific issues he vows to deal with on his first day in office: rescinding Davis' tripling of the state car tax by executive order, voiding $42 billion in overpriced state electricity contracts, and calling for a special legislative session to slash worker's compensation costs by two-thirds and reverse the flow of jobs to other states. ("And then I'll go to lunch," McClintock joked.)
To skeptics who say that someone who is strongly pro-life will have difficulty winning in California, McClintock campaign operative John Stoos told HUMAN EVENTS: "Tom had a 100% pro-life voting record and won re-election to his senate seat in 2000 by double-digits, while Al Gore was winning the district by 19%. And when Tom ran for controller last year, he ran 103,000 votes ahead of Bill Simon and lost in the end by less than 1% of the vote."
But some of McClintock's admirers concede the oft-heard criticism that the cerebral Ventura County "issues man" isn't adept at cultivating potential donors and has a record of being a poor fund-raiser. Stoos, however, disagrees and responded to this criticism by pointing out that McClintock already has raised more than $500,000 and has strong name recognition from his close-fought race for state controller.
Many delegates at the CRA convention worried that McClintock and Simon would split the conservative vote in the state, making it impossible for either to win. Also, despite McClintock's endorsement from the CRA, and strong support among conservative activists, there are other elements in the state party who, although they are untroubled by Schwarzenegger's positions on social issues and his still largely unexplained views on other issues, nonetheless back him because they believe he is the only Republican who can win in the recall election.
At the Los Angeles County offices in Norwalk last Saturday morning a large crowd of local pols, autographseekers and reporters gathered behind police barricades in sweltering heat in hopes of seeing Schwarzenegger file the papers to run in the recall. Finally, a Mercedes SUV pulled up and, amidst wild cheering, Schwarzenegger stepped out and, accompanied by wife Maria Shriver, entered the building. Fifteen minutes later, he emerged and, after reporters shooed fellow candidate and columnist Arianna Huffington away from the podium, he officially announced that he was a candidate, declined to answer any questions, climbed back into his Mercedes and departed.
Alan Smith, executive director of Los Angeles County Republican Party, was there in the crowd. Smith describes himself as a "pro-life, pro-gun, conservative." Yet while proclaiming neutrality among the three Republican candidates, he pointed out that "since Arnold announced last week, the number of people calling or e-mailing our headquarters to be involved in Republican politics has gone from, at most, five a day to fifty a day. His announcement alone means a resurgence we haven't seen in a long time."
Jennifer Jacobs, fund-raiser for the San Diego County Republican Party, made similar observations. The actor's candidacy has made it easier to persuade people to contribute to the party, she said. "Our phones are ringing off the hook," she said, "with people who want to get involved [with a Schwarzenegger campaign]."
Other Republican Party operatives also expressed their willingness to overlook Schwarzenegger's liberal views on abortion, gun control and gay adoption, and his statement that he will "never forgive" the Republican Party for impeaching President Clinton. Over breakfast in Toluca Lake on Saturday, actress Cheryl Felicia Rhoads—who is strongly pro-life, and who volunteered in the unsuccessful 2000 re-election campaign of Rep. Jim Rogan (R.-Calif.), the impeachment manager—exclaimed upon learning I was headed for Schwarzenegger's filing: "I want to volunteer in his campaign headquarters!" When I asked about differences on social issues and the candidate's put-down of the impeachment, which her friend Rogan had championed, Rhoads shook her head and said, "We need a Republican governor out here." (Later, Rhoads contacted me to say that the news that Schwarzenegger had voted for Proposition 187, which would have cut off most state social services to illegal aliens, was good "because that issue is important to most Californians.")
Conservatives searching for reasons to vote for Schwarzenegger—or dismissing key issues that could be seen as reasons not to vote against him—may well become the most important voters in what is inarguably the political contest of the year, and a defining moment for the Republican Party.
"I really don't even like Schwarzenegger," said convention chairman Peggy Mew of Los Angeles County. "I mean, what do we really know about him? He's pro-abortion, for gay adoption and gun control, and said he was 'ashamed' of his party's role in the Clinton impeachment. No, I could never vote for him."
Replacing Davis with Schwarzenegger is similar to: replacing Bill with Hillary, Lenin with Stalin, or Daschle with Pelosi.
Good to see a reversal in the F.R. Poll.
GOP will quit allowing/INVITING democrats to run in elections as republicans
At least they chose Schwarzenegger to act the part.
And let us not fool ourselves into thinking that Bustamante will be so horrible he'll be kicked out in a couple years and a conservative will be elected in his place. Does one really think liberal Californians (with the help of inept republicans) will vote that way? I'll believe it when it happens; until then just seems like wishful thinking.
This is no different than an invite coming from the NAACP, as though a candidate would somehow gain favor through attendance. It is pure bullcrap.
You dopes are going to cause the Republicans to lose another winnable election through this kind of crap. The only Republican who is going to win California is Arnold. If you dont get behind him, you are only helping Grey Davis again.
Agreed!
Arnold Schwarzenegger is a self professed social liberal. He says he's a fiscal conservative, however, he hasn't proven it yet. Schwarzenegger will have to make a considerable effort to convince conservatives he supports the twin pillars of fiscal conservatism, cutting taxes and reducing government spending.
Arnold says, he wants to get California out of the red, so the states social welfare entitlement programs will run more effectively and efficiently. That's high minded liberalism.
Arnold also says, he wants to bring businesses back into California, so tax revenues will increase and the states social welfare programs will have proper funding to operate. More high minded liberalism.
So far, Arnold's efforts have fallen flat.
Well, at least you've been good enough to show your true colors as someone who despises and belittles conservatives. Are you a former Pete Wilson staffer by any chance - - - or maybe you're Pete himself?
You two need to head back to the circus. You're nothing but clowns.
There's the key. How many new calls do you think McClintock brought in?
McClintock - 53%
Simon - 5%
Schwarzenegger - 36%
Other - 3%
F.R. Poll
Naw, Arnold is just a pukin dog scardy cat.
I don't smell coffee. I smell a liberal! Schwarzengger isn't a conservative and there's no evidence so far, that he would be any better then Boy Davis, or the Cruzzer. LOL
If Arnold comes out with an agenda that takes the course of fiscal conservatism, then he may be able to secure enough conservative votes to win the recall election. Otherwise, let the Democrats have the state for another three years and screw it up even more. May be the people will finally get fed up and realize that the Democratic Party offers them nothing.
>>>A RINO is better than a demoncrat.
Take your blinders off. Arnold's a self professed social liberal and his desire to be accepted as a fiscal conservative is highly dubious.
What difference does it make then? Point to me one public statement Ahnold has made that shows he will push for/support anything different then Davis or Bustamante? Cite to the source please. Is it his support of abortion? Gun control? higher taxes - as honestly stated by Buffet? more spending (for the children)? What policy position of Ahnold's makes him different from Davis or Bustamante, and worth a vote because there is an "R" next to his name? Oh, wait, if we elect a republican, even one who opposes every republican principle or idea, we somehow still win!! I guess you have me there.
And we know, only Ahnold can win. It is impossible for anyone else to win. So we should support him. That way, its a republican who raises taxes, raises spending, issues more environmental regulations, more gun control laws, and passes more hate crimes and endorses gay adoption and marriage. But, its still a win. He has an "R" next to his name.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.