Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Democrats must recall that they reap what they sow
Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^ | August 12, 2003 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 08/14/2003 1:51:21 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

"The big date is Oct. 7, and the liberal elitists are shaking in their Ferragamo shoes . . . The public has taken charge, and the liberal elite can't stand it."

So, Californians are going to decide whether to remove their hapless governor, Gray Davis, in a recall vote and elect a new one. The big date is Oct. 7, and the liberal elitists are shaking in their Ferragamo shoes.

Art Torres, California's Democrat Party chairman, complains that the recall "just exacerbates the impression that we're a bunch of wackos out here."

Sorry, Art, but that impression exists because of what you and your party have done to California, not because the people, through lawful, civil and democratic means, have decided to reclaim their state.

The AFL-CIO, whose members have benefited mightily from the governor's profligate spending, has warned any independent-minded Democrats: "We anticipate that you will work with us ... to maintain this clear, united message" of support for Davis. And Democratic National Committee Chairman Terry McAuliffe seeks to diminish the recall effort as a Republican coup, claiming that "it's outrageous that someone can come up with a million dollars and undo an election. The voters aren't going to let (the Republicans) hijack this election."

What's really bothering these folks is that they can't control the process. The public has taken charge, and the liberal elite can't stand it.

So the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, led by longtime Democrats Kweisi Mfume and Julian Bond, went to court to block this election, claiming that minorities would be disenfranchised. Apparently Mfume and Bond prefer total disenfranchisement.

Davis himself unsuccessfully asked the judiciary to delay the election until March, hoping that the passage of time would diminish the public's enthusiasm for his ouster.

And then there's the effort to ridicule the process by focusing on some of the more absurd candidates. They include a smut peddler who cares, Larry Flynt. Now, if you think about it, is Flynt really that much different from Bill Clinton?

Actor Gary Coleman is throwing his hat in the ring. Yet isn't Coleman as qualified to lead California as ex-Vermont Gov. Howard Dean is to serve as commander in chief?

Citizens from all walks of life have lined up to run for governor, including some kooks. But so what? Kooks run in many elections. Some even manage to get elected. Take Congress, for example. Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-Texas) once asked if the Mars Pathfinder took any pictures of the flag planted by astronauts in 1969 -- on the moon -- and has demanded that black-sounding names be used for hurricanes. Rep. Pete Stark (D-Calif.) is given to challenging his colleagues to fisticuffs. Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) applauded Osama bin Laden for his philanthropy. And the list goes on.

California has become a liberal laboratory of failed economic and social experiments. Davis and his overwhelmingly Democrat Legislature have turned this once-proud state into a banana republic, and the people have said enough is enough.

Republicans may have been among the most active supporters of the recall movement, but it would be a mistake to ignore its broad appeal. There have been more than 30 attempts to recall California governors, including Ronald Reagan. This is the first such effort to make it to the ballot. The reason: opposition to Davis is so widespread.

Californians are also voting with their feet. They are leaving the state in bigger numbers than citizens of other states are arriving. California's population growth is caused by the influx of immigrants -- many of them illegal. Davis' answer is to increase taxes and cut basic services to the citizens, while increasing benefits for illegal immigrants -- including driver's licenses, in-state college tuition benefits, etc.

Moreover, between 1998 and 2001, state spending increased more than 35 percent. California's $38 billion shortfall was larger than the budgets of most states. California's bond rating has been slashed, increasing the cost of its enormous debt. And during this time, Davis added more than 25,000 state employees to the public payroll.

Davis was slow to react to his state's energy crisis for fear of offending the radical environmentalists. The infrastructure for energy production was incapable of meeting growing demand. He then purchased long-term energy contracts at top dollar, and spot market contracts during market peaks. The result: The public paid more for energy, yet faced rolling gray-outs.

The California recall effort is a legitimate, albeit extraordinary, public reaction to a complete deterioration in political leadership. It's difficult to see how Governor (Fill in the Blank) could do much worse.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: comeuppance
Poll: "Do you agree that this is the way for the 'public' to run a state government?
1 posted on 08/14/2003 1:51:21 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
So the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, led by longtime Democrats Kweisi Mfume and Julian Bond, went to court to block this election, claiming that minorities would be disenfranchised. Apparently Mfume and Bond prefer total disenfranchisement.

Recall wild card: turnout for another issue on ballot (colorbind policies)

2 posted on 08/14/2003 1:53:46 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; All
-Total Recall- the Gray Davis Soap Opera--
3 posted on 08/14/2003 2:00:08 AM PDT by backhoe (Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the trackball into the Sunset...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
What's really bothering these folks is that they can't control the process. The public has taken charge, and the liberal elite can't stand it.

Truer words rarely spoken!

4 posted on 08/14/2003 2:00:21 AM PDT by onyx (Name an honest democrat? I can't either!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Bump!
5 posted on 08/14/2003 2:01:01 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: onyx
***The public has taken charge, and the liberal elite can't stand it. ***

An excellent lesson for the U.S. electorate - You do have the POWER and you must use it before it's too late. Next thing citizens need to rise up in arms about is the activist judiciary, something Californians know about all too well.

6 posted on 08/14/2003 2:04:04 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Hi, Cincy-- I just had a weird experience- my DSL connection went down, and I had to use the dialup fallback- my God, it's slow!

People I talked to before signing up for DSL all swore "I'll never go back to dialup" and I can certainly see why.

7 posted on 08/14/2003 2:04:35 AM PDT by backhoe (Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the trackball into the Sunset...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Mine went down too backhoe. So I went and made breakfast. When I came back it was up. It reminds me to appreciate it when it works.
8 posted on 08/14/2003 2:09:42 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I've had some sort of dialup connection since the days of the TRS-80 ( the deluxe model with a whole 64K of RAM...) and a 300 baud modem on Vashon Island, Washington, in 1981-- and I agonized over spending the extra money for DSL service... but now that we have, I'd never go back unless there were no other choices.
9 posted on 08/14/2003 2:31:37 AM PDT by backhoe (Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the trackball into the Sunset...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
They include a smut peddler who cares, Larry Flynt. Now, if you think about it, is Flynt really that much different from Bill Clinton?

Well, Flynt is, to some extent, a Capitalist.

10 posted on 08/14/2003 2:34:08 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The public has taken charge, and the liberal elite can't stand it.

BTW, just to comment generally?

I have long been fascinated by the macrocosm/microcosm relationship-- how events great and small seem to mirror each other. Our tiny city of Brunswick ( about 16,000 souls ) has been going through the process of trying to recall the Mayor and the entire City Commission, for possible criminal malfeasance in squandering tax money.

How it will play out is anyone's guess- the recall, which I posted here, was killed off by the local board of elections ( part & parcel of the problem ) ruling that there weren't enough valid signatures to force a recall.

Since then, a suit has been filed in civil court, and the Governor has ordered an investigation into the possible mis-spending of city funds.

11 posted on 08/14/2003 2:38:56 AM PDT by backhoe (Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the trackball into the Sunset...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob
is Flynt really that much different from Bill Clinton?

Yes, Flynt admits to being a sexual deviant.
12 posted on 08/14/2003 2:51:58 AM PDT by gsrinok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Moreover, between 1998 and 2001, state spending increased more than 35 percent.

I feel sorry for you conservative CA's. It looks like Atlas is going to Shrug, no matter what "governor" emerges from this circus. Take heart, though, I don't think we AZ's are far behind you. With our own influx of illegals, and our importing of West and East Coast Liberals, who will continue to re-create the conditions that they have fled, we'll be right behind you. Liberals are stupid, they will never learn. When they're slipping under the water of Socialism, drowning, they will still be crying, "Socialism is Good! You just didn't do it the way we Smart People would have! You Racist Capitalists are to blame!"

Punks.

13 posted on 08/14/2003 3:02:29 AM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Gray presents his emergency budget


14 posted on 08/14/2003 3:38:56 AM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Next thing citizens need to rise up in arms about is the activist judiciary, something Californians know about all too well.

If the Texas Democrats succeed in warding off, or significantly delaying, redistricting through a hand picked kangaroo court in Laredo, the uprising will be right here in Texas.

15 posted on 08/14/2003 4:51:37 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The poll is run according to democrat rules. That is, multiple votes are allowed
16 posted on 08/14/2003 7:28:18 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
ROFL!

Please consider beginning a Bonaparte Ping List. Thank you.

17 posted on 08/15/2003 1:44:24 AM PDT by bd476 (The only thing to fear is fear itself, so be brave and vote ... Vote ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson