Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Visclosky and Bayh still working to prevent move of Magnequench to China. Smart bomb technology
Chesterton Tribune (Community Newspaper-Indiana ^ | 8/6/2003 | Staff-Busness News

Posted on 08/08/2003 8:44:36 AM PDT by RicocheT

US smart bomb technology unit to move to China

U.S. Rep. Pete Visclosky, D-1st, and U.S. Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Ind., have made another move in their efforts to prevent the closure of the Magnequench facility in Valparaiso and its re-location to the People’s Republic of China.

According to a statement released Friday, Visclosky and Bayh have requested the U.S. Department of the Treasury to release the facts of its investigation into its review of Magnequench’s sale in 1995 to a consortium which included Chinese interests and Magnequench’s acquisition in 2000 of the Valparaiso facility.

Visclosky also asked the House Armed Services Committee to review the contracts which Magnequench currently holds with the Department of Defense.

The closure of the Magnequench facility in Valparaiso would cost the jobs of 225 Northwest Indiana residents and “transfer sensitive bomb-making technology to China,” the statement said. According to the Department of Defense, 80 percent of the rare-earth magnets used in the production of smart bombs come from the Valparaiso facility. “In addition to costing more than 200 working families their livelihoods, the transfer of the facility to China raises serious industrial base concerns.”

“It is our obligation as public servants to pull out all the stops for the workers and their families who will lose their livelihoods,” Visclosky said. “I do not intend to leave anything on the table. I will use every resource at my disposal, and I am very grateful to have Sen. Bayh’s full support and cooperation in this effort.”

“The workers at Magnequench deserve a full explanation as to why their jobs are headed overseas,” Bayh said. “Moving 225 jobs out of Indiana, at a time when the economy is already in a weakened state, disregards the needs of hundreds of Hoosier families. We deserve answers not only about the economic impact of this move, but also about the potential threat to national security that it creates.”

Visclosky and Bayh added that the potential transfer of these operations to China raises new questions about maintaining both a significant source of domestic production of rare-earth magnets and U.S. technological leadership.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: china; smartbombs; technologytransfer
China again steals U. S. defense technology, our government gives away the rope the future enemy will use to hang us.
1 posted on 08/08/2003 8:44:37 AM PDT by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RicocheT
Bush could stop this if he wanted to...It is becoming clear to me that the average, modern day rank and file Republican is an Anti-American globalist...
2 posted on 08/08/2003 8:58:14 AM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RicocheT
Do they really have sensitive technology, or is this merely an effort by these Congressmen to prevent a local company from moving?
3 posted on 08/08/2003 9:05:20 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
According to a story in Insight magazine they produce very sensitive, defense oriented supe magnets that are an integrel part of our smartbomb technology. Allowing this technology to go to China is equivalent to sharing our nuclear, and missle guidance and propulsion technology with the Iranians or NK, and then helping them build the factories to produce the weapons, all the while hoping they don't return the end product to us with hostile intent. Lenin was right the West, for the sake of a buck, will give the commies the rope with which they can hang us.
4 posted on 08/08/2003 9:12:40 AM PDT by redangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: redangus
In that case, I wonder why we let the Chinese purchase the company to begin with. Seems like the horse is out of the barn.
5 posted on 08/08/2003 10:11:39 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RicocheT
thanks again, BJ Clinton, for loosening trade restrictions of technology!
Damned TRAITOR.
6 posted on 08/08/2003 12:32:50 PM PDT by King Prout (people hear and do not listen, see and do not observe, speak without thought, post and not edit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
BUSH!! BUSH!!! BUSH!!!!

He is the "CEO" President. He is the CIC. He is the one who is under oath to preserve and protect and defend our Constitution and our way of life.

And this outrage is happening on his watch.

It is a staggering betrayal of America.
7 posted on 08/08/2003 12:48:57 PM PDT by Jonathan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jonathan
read more closely - this deal began in 1995.
Stopping a done-deal while respecting current law is a bitch... unless you don't care about that little "no ex-post-facto" clause in the Constitution?
8 posted on 08/08/2003 12:51:31 PM PDT by King Prout (people hear and do not listen, see and do not observe, speak without thought, post and not edit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
read more closely - this deal began in 1995. Stopping a done-deal while respecting current law is a bitch... unless you don't care about that little "no ex-post-facto" clause in the Constitution?

It's not that hard. National security trumps all laws. From Evan Bayh's website:

"Bayh and Visclosky are asking President Bush to prevent the relocation under the Exon-Florio provision passed by Congress in 1988. The provision directed the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) to examine the potential national security implications of foreign investment and deemed that when national security is at risk, CFIUS has the authority to recommend actions to the President. In this case, action would be taken to stop the relocation of Magnequench's Valparaiso facility to China."[emphasis mine]

9 posted on 08/15/2003 8:04:21 AM PDT by Orbiting_Rosie's_Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RicocheT

bttt


10 posted on 05/07/2006 3:35:42 PM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson