Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/04/2003 12:50:14 PM PDT by NukeMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NukeMan; blam; vannrox
Looks like something you'd like to read....
2 posted on 08/04/2003 12:53:29 PM PDT by NukeMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NukeMan
Using radiocarbon dating, scientists found that the Ushki site, the remains of a community of hunters clustered around Ushki Lake in northeastern Russia, appears to be only about 13,000 years old, 4,000 years younger than originally thought.

OK so THIS site isn't old enough. Nothing in this discovery says they DIDN'T cross there 4,000 years earlier. All it shows is that this site is irrelevant to the debate.

3 posted on 08/04/2003 12:58:30 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (Fighting for Freedom and Having Fun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NukeMan
I don't get it. Just because the Siberian settlement wasn't the direct source of the human migration during the land bridge doesn't prove that the land bridge wasn't used by someone else.
4 posted on 08/04/2003 1:00:39 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NukeMan
Calico: A 200,000 year old site in the Americas?
7 posted on 08/04/2003 1:09:02 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NukeMan
"We have to think bigger now and start thinking outside the box."

Maybe they could paddle out of that box...


8 posted on 08/04/2003 1:09:12 PM PDT by Redcloak (All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NukeMan
Given the fact the land bridge is mostly underwater, finding out one site is younger than believed doesn't rule out its existence or use... the "land bridge" was huge... not saying they didn't come in boats... but this hardly discredits the land bridge theory in and of itself.
9 posted on 08/04/2003 1:11:07 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NukeMan
'Arlington Springs Woman', 13,000 Years Old Human Skeleton, California Island
10 posted on 08/04/2003 1:19:46 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry; js1138
Ping!!
11 posted on 08/04/2003 1:23:43 PM PDT by Aric2000 (If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NukeMan
I haven't read it yet, but Red Earth, White Lies is supposed to have a good refutation of the Bering Land Bridge theory.

ML/NJ

12 posted on 08/04/2003 1:34:09 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NukeMan
Exactly what are they carbon dating? Pieces of wood?
13 posted on 08/04/2003 1:38:32 PM PDT by skeeter (Fac ut vivas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NukeMan
...said Michael Waters, co-author of the research that appeared last week in the journal Science. "We have to think bigger now and start thinking outside the box."

Start with different cliches.

17 posted on 08/04/2003 1:50:12 PM PDT by Sloth ("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NukeMan
bump
18 posted on 08/04/2003 1:53:57 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NukeMan
University of Kansas anthropological geneticist Michael Crawford said early humans probably could not have crossed the land bridge and traveled to New Mexico in 400 years. Reaching South America by foot within 1,000 years was even less likely.

I don't see this at all. That's a diffusion rate of around 10 miles per year. Even non-nomadic people can achieve that.

19 posted on 08/04/2003 1:58:45 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NukeMan
But some archaeologists argue that due to the nomadic characteristics of America's first settlers, the seemingly difficult feat of traversing both North and South America in 1,000 years is not

They would not only have had to be very nomadic but able to adapt to the multitude of changing climates (each containing a different mix of new plant and animal life) as they travelled from North to South America. That is a pretty tall order.

20 posted on 08/04/2003 1:59:32 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NukeMan
making it highly unlikely that people could have traversed the thousands of miles from Siberia in such a short period

Maybe they took I-5.

27 posted on 08/04/2003 2:34:22 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NukeMan
Suggest to these same scientists the "Native Americans" might have started from here ,and migrated to Asia,and you will undoubtedly be treated to a long, cool silence...
29 posted on 08/04/2003 4:06:53 PM PDT by genefromjersey (So little time - so many FLAMES to light !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NukeMan
I guess I don't understand why everyone seems so partial to the land bridge theories. If the article is correct, there is no evidence to support the idea that the folks who settled Clovis came from Asia on land. While there may be other undiscovered sites on the Asian side, who cares? The land bridge theory has been cracking and flaking for awhile. Let it go.
47 posted on 08/05/2003 10:50:26 AM PDT by aBootes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NukeMan
DNA testing of native Americans should offer clues to their ancestory ... isn't this avenue being explored?
50 posted on 08/05/2003 11:15:13 AM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam; FairOpinion; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach
A Blast from the Past.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

55 posted on 02/18/2007 9:43:43 PM PST by SunkenCiv (I last updated my profile on Thursday, February 15, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Just updating the GGG info, not sending a general distribution.

from two keywords, "solutrean" and "solutreans", sorted chrono: To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

·Dogpile · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google ·
· The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


56 posted on 06/24/2009 3:02:11 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (http://www.troopathon.org/index.php -- June 25th -- the Troopathon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson