Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Voucher backers have ulterior motives
Capital Times ^ | 8/01/03 | Dave Zweifel

Posted on 08/02/2003 4:14:37 AM PDT by DPB101

A new report by the People for the American Way Foundation contains some disturbing details about the movement for private school vouchers.

While there are undoubtedly many parents in troubled school districts who sincerely believe that tax-supported vouchers will help their children get a better education, the report suggests that they are being used as patsies for a much bigger goal - the privatization of all public education.

The report, called The Voucher Veneer: The Deeper Agenda to Privatize Public Education (it's online at www.pfaw.org/go/voucher_venee), uncovers a network of Religious Right groups, free-market economists, ultraconservative columnists and others "who are using vouchers as a vehicle to achieve an ultimate goal of privatizing" the education system.

For instance, the report cites the following examples of education views held by many of the leading voucher proponents:

Joseph Bast, president of the Heartland Institute (an ultraconservative Chicago think tank that is liberally supported by the Bradley Foundation of Milwaukee, one of the biggest voucher backers in Wisconsin), has called vouchers the "way to privatize schooling," and has predicted that voucher programs for the "urban poor will lead the way to statewide universal voucher plans.

"Soon, most government schools will be converted into private schools or simply close their doors," Bast predicts.

David Brennan, an Ohio businessman and the author of Cleveland's new voucher law, proclaims proudly that "education is first, last and always a business."

Rep. Tom Tancredo, a Colorado Republican and ardent voucher supporter, remarked when he was appointed to the House education committee that he was now in a position to advance the privatization agenda.

"I think it's a lot easier to kill the beast when you get in the cave," he said.

The Rev. Jerry Falwell, who along with his colleague in the Religious Right, Pat Robertson, is an incessant voucher advocate, has proclaimed, "I hope I live to see the day when, as in the early days of our country, we won't have any public schools. The churches will have taken them over again and Christians will be running them."

The "veneer," according to the report, is provided by concerned parents who feel the public system has failed their children, particularly in large urban areas like Milwaukee.

But the People for the American Way is convinced the voucher system has become a convenient cover for a more sophisticated ambition that includes making our schools more a business and less burdensome on the tax rolls.

One example: The Heritage Foundation, in one of its own reports, has expressed hope that "vouchers could limit how much taxpayers must pay to educate the disabled and begin a movement toward cost containment."

In other words, private schools won't have to accept "expensive" students who might hurt the bottom line.

Some would argue that the report is describing a conspiracy that doesn't really exist.

Nevertheless, we better be paying attention.



Excerpts from the People for the American Way Foundation report:

Today, governmental responsibilities in education and the strong connection that Americans have with their public schools are being put to a serious test. A network of Religious Right groups, free-market economists, ultraconservative columnists and others are using vouchers as a vehicle to achieve their ultimate goal of privatizing education . . .

Joel Belz, publisher of World--a Religious Right magazine--wrote a column several years ago sympathizing with those who oppose vouchers because they don't want government to play any role in education. He wrote: " [supporting vouchers] helps bring down the statist system, which it will, it will be worth the temporary compromise. . . ."

Recently, the Bush Administration appointed Nina Shokraii Rees, a staunch voucher advocate, to head DOE's Office of Innovation and Improvement . . .

Many pro-privatization groups offer two messages: one for committed followers and another for the broader public . . .

For example, the Florida-based James Madison Institute has stated that it "believes that parents should have the freedom to make decisions in the best interests of their children." Most Americans, including those who strongly support public education, would likely agree with this vague statement. These words, of course, leave unmentioned the fact that the James Madison Institute's education policy director has signed a proclamation that calls for scrapping the public education system.

Last year, one of the largest Religious Right groups in the country called for "dumping the failing and fatally flawed public schools." And, last July, syndicated columnist Joseph Farah addressed his column to public school parents. "If your kids are in government school," he stated, "you are part of the problem."

For many of these radical voices, vouchers serve as a convenient means to further their broader anti-government, tax-cutting agenda . . .



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: education; nea; neas; pfaw; schoolchoice; vouchers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
For those who believe vouchers are a left wing plot to take over private schools...
1 posted on 08/02/2003 4:14:37 AM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DPB101
...the privatization of all public education.

I went to twelve years of private school. I'm all for it!!!!

2 posted on 08/02/2003 4:24:05 AM PDT by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
...a network of Religious Right groups, free-market economists, ultraconservative columnists and others "who are using vouchers as a vehicle to achieve an ultimate goal of privatizing" the education system.

So exactly what's the problem?

3 posted on 08/02/2003 4:24:48 AM PDT by Huber (Ann Coulter's Treason is a corrective lens to clearly perceive the motivation of the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
Black conservative ping

If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)

Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.

4 posted on 08/02/2003 4:27:07 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
"Soon, most government schools will be converted into private schools or simply close their doors," Bast predicts.

Soon???? Sounds like a scare tactic to me. Maybe in thirty or forty years most will be privatized. Or maybe private schools will be effectively legislated out of existence in the future. One thing for sure is that we can hardly do worse than we do now.

5 posted on 08/02/2003 4:27:54 AM PDT by Fzob (Why does this tag line keep showing up?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
Privatizing education an "ulterior motive?" I would hope it's right up there on the front burner for all to see.
6 posted on 08/02/2003 4:31:01 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
A most laughable story! Take the truth and tell it in tone of breathless fear and act like it's a bad thing! The article forgets to point out that ANYONE, including psychotic self deluded leftists will be able to construct their own school, not just Jerry Falwell and his evil minions. It forgets to point out that the public schools are pretty much SHATTERING FAILURES in their mission EXCEPT to the degree that they are leftwing indoctrination camps. And the article forgeta to remember that John Cardinal O'Connorof New York , who ALREADY was running a HUGE private school system, PUBLICLY asked for any students Who were a burden to the system. Who doubts that America is FILLED with denominations who would fell the same impulse of mission as the late Cardinal? As I said: A LAUGHABLE article by self deluded Lefties!
7 posted on 08/02/2003 4:32:36 AM PDT by TalBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fzob
Or maybe private schools will be effectively legislated out of existence in the future.

They could do it with so many regulations nobody could afford to run one. Or trial lawyers could bankrupt them. In the 1920s, the Klu Klux Klan pushed the passage of a law in Oregon which effectively banned private schools. The Supreme Court knocked it down (but the Klansmen didn't stop. They went on to found Barry Lynn's group--Americans United for Separation of Church and State).

8 posted on 08/02/2003 4:33:33 AM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TalBlack
As I said: A LAUGHABLE article by self deluded Lefties!

It is. Unfortunately, Norman Lear and PFAW have almost unlimited funds. PFAW is the point group working with Charles Schumer to block the Bush judicial nominees.

9 posted on 08/02/2003 4:35:50 AM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
Nope...no media bias here...none whatsoever.

Where is this "Vast Right Wing Controlled Media" I keep hearing about?
10 posted on 08/02/2003 4:41:14 AM PDT by ItsOurTimeNow ("The board is set. The pieces are moving. We come to it at last...the Great Battle of our time.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
Some would argue that the report is describing a conspiracy that doesn't really exist.

And some would argue that you are in serious need of therapy.

They would be right.

I have always publicly stated that I thought that once parents got a hold of vouchers that the public school system as we know it would begin to die. Can there be such a thing as a "public conspiracy"?

11 posted on 08/02/2003 5:47:15 AM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Under advice from my lawyer I will now be known as Mostly Harmless Teddy Bear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
To the left, parents deciding anything is a conspiracy.
12 posted on 08/02/2003 6:00:59 AM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
I live in a rural area where we are lucky to have any schools, and my kids are grown - but I don't understand the voucher thing. My friend goes to a Catholic church in a city and is so tired to being asked to constantly up her contributions to the church to finance the Church School. If more kids are put into the private church school system, will the congregation be able to keep up with the expenses?
Listening to my friend, she has really had it with paying for the school connected to her church. She is looking for a Catholic church that doesn't fund a school. Like I say - I have no experiences to have an opinion. I certainly can't imagine our little country churches paying to start a school.
13 posted on 08/02/2003 6:04:54 AM PDT by Leeann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leeann
Been involved with school choice for a while and your questions are new to me. Worth asking certainly. Anyone know some Catholics to flag?
14 posted on 08/02/2003 6:15:03 AM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
I believe that the government school system is a disgrace because it is essentially a socialist system (the schools are owned and operated by the government and the teachers are govt employees). Since this model has led to disaster wherever it has been implemented, I think that we should privatize our education system.

Where is the "ulterior" motive? Its pretty much out in the open, Mr. Zweifel.

The real question is: "how could any intelligent person analyze our current public school system and not believe that it needs to be totally discarded?"

If anyone has ulterior motives, it is those who insist that america's kids continue to attend schools which are flawed in theory and failing badly in practice. Why, Mr. Zweifel, do you want to continue with proven failure?????

15 posted on 08/02/2003 6:15:35 AM PDT by quebecois
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DPB101; Pubbie; JohnnyZ; Theodore R.; Nathaniel Fischer; AuH2ORepublican; LdSentinal; Kuksool; ...
"People for the American Way Foundation"

They misspelled Soviet.

16 posted on 08/02/2003 6:19:22 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~Remember, it's not sporting to fire at RINO until charging~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
Telling urban black parents, "Take this voucher and your child can use it to go to any school." is a lie.

Private education flatly does not want her child. Any private school that accepted any appreciable number of inner city "voucher kids" (say, above 10%) would undergo a massive white flight of its customer base. Consequently, a private school would make sure the percentage of "voucher kids" never got above 5%.

So the notion that vouchers can make any appreciable dent in the inner city public school system is false.
17 posted on 08/02/2003 6:24:49 AM PDT by Tokhtamish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leeann
Whooopee. You think the public schools don't send kids home begging for money? Magazine sales, cookie, candy sales etc., are every day crap to raise money for public schools. If the mom is tired of the private school, get' em out. Then she can compain about the public schools schemes for money.
18 posted on 08/02/2003 6:25:14 AM PDT by usslsm51 (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
"Voucher backers have ulterior motives"

Should be changed to the NEA has ulterior motives.
19 posted on 08/02/2003 6:27:04 AM PDT by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tokhtamish
I believe the Catholic Church in NYC offered 1,000 scholarships to the kids having the most problems in public schools. The church wanted to put to rest the idea it "creamed" the best students from public schools. The unions killed it. The vouchers were refused by the city.

Aside from that, why not offer them and see? Why assume space will not be available?

20 posted on 08/02/2003 6:30:27 AM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson