Skip to comments.
Gore Recount Lawyer Faces Ethics Sanctions
CNSNews.com ^
| 7/24/03
| Marc Morano
Posted on 07/24/2003 2:41:23 AM PDT by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
"But the public does expect people that have as much influence as Mr. Boies to behave responsibly, and this could have a very negative impact on his career... Not in Democrat circles.
1
posted on
07/24/2003 2:41:24 AM PDT
by
kattracks
To: kattracks; connectthedots
Hehe...
2
posted on
07/24/2003 2:47:23 AM PDT
by
Bonaparte
To: kattracks
I always thought he looked unethical.
3
posted on
07/24/2003 2:51:30 AM PDT
by
larryjohnson
(USAF(Ret))
To: kattracks
Isn't this the guy who was somewhat hygienically challenged? (Did I spell hygienically wrong?)
4
posted on
07/24/2003 3:40:20 AM PDT
by
Mrs. P
To: Mrs. P
Free Republic could use a spell checker.
My huge dictionary just dosen't fit in over here by the keyboard.
But for now, don't worry about it.
The only lawyers who would work with that gang would have to likely lean towards unethical behavior to complete the orders from their clients.
5
posted on
07/24/2003 3:48:43 AM PDT
by
battlegearboat
(Tagline Surplus Sales - Everything Must Go!)
To: battlegearboat
Free Republic could use a spell checker. Go to iespell.com and get their free spell-checker for iexplorer.
6
posted on
07/24/2003 4:01:13 AM PDT
by
woofer
To: Bonaparte
DAVID BOIES?
7
posted on
07/24/2003 4:29:26 AM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
To: Puppage
Ethical Democrats?
oxymoron
8
posted on
07/24/2003 4:43:00 AM PDT
by
Northern Yankee
(Freedom.... needs a soldier !)
To: Northern Yankee
Good point. I guess we shouldn't be totally surprised.
9
posted on
07/24/2003 4:46:27 AM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
To: kattracks
So what is the actual charge?
10
posted on
07/24/2003 4:47:37 AM PDT
by
Those_Crazy_Liberals
(Ronaldus Magnus he's our man . . . If he can't do it, no one can.)
To: rdb3; Golden Eagle; Nick Danger
Pinging the Penguin Pinger. This is the guy who's going to help SCO (pronounced "scum") take out IBM. HAHAHAHA.
11
posted on
07/24/2003 4:49:54 AM PDT
by
Salo
To: Puppage
Is this the Lawyer who wore tennis shoes everywhere. . .even at the Supreme Court?
12
posted on
07/24/2003 4:59:14 AM PDT
by
cricket
To: John Robinson; B Knotts; stainlessbanner; TechJunkYard; ShadowAce; Knitebane; AppyPappy; jae471; ...
The Penguin Ping.
Wanna be Penguified? Just holla!
Got root?
13
posted on
07/24/2003 5:01:05 AM PDT
by
rdb3
(Nerve-racking since 0413hrs on XII-XXII-MCMLXXI)
To: Salo
This is the guy who's going to help SCO (pronounced "scum") take out IBM. Circuit Court Judge David Crow called the series of lawsuits by Boies on Habie's behalf "a sad commentary on the inability of the legal system and the courts of our state to resolve a simple contract dispute, when one is willing to litigate without regard to costs."
Hmmm.
14
posted on
07/24/2003 5:02:55 AM PDT
by
Nick Danger
(The views expressed may not actually be views)
To: Salo
I agree that David Boies is a real slimeball. Unfortunately he knows the tech industry like the back of his hand. Who else has taken on Microsoft, and won. IBM, probably next.
To: cricket
You bet cha.
16
posted on
07/24/2003 5:11:51 AM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
To: Golden Eagle
Unfortunately he knows the tech industry like the back of his hand. Who else has taken on Microsoft, and won. IBM, probably next.
David Boise knows technology? That has yet to be proven. His work against Microsoft wasn't all that successful and he was a total train wreck with Napster. A joke.
As far as SCO (AKA Caldera) against IBM? Boise will relive his Napster failure. Caldera, at best, will be a small chip in IBM's windshield. At best.
If a group of lawyers got together and built you a chair to sit in it would be the first time any of them did anything of value.
David Boise is a bottom feeder. But that's his chosen in life.
17
posted on
07/24/2003 5:15:35 AM PDT
by
isthisnickcool
(Liberals - Their neural synapses are corroded.)
To: kattracks; Bonaparte
Remember how Boies mischaracterized the Illinois chad case in his filings before the courts in the post-election?
To: kattracks
couldnt happen to a better shyster
19
posted on
07/24/2003 5:31:34 AM PDT
by
wafflehouse
(the hell you say!)
To: isthisnickcool
David Boise knows technology? Yes, were you not aware he actually was the defense lawyer for IBM in a portion of their 30+ years of anti-trust trials? I believe that is where he first made a name for himself.
Yes he lost Napster but no one on earth could have won that case. Linux will be on the Napster hot seat this time, being the ones likely holding the stolen property.
I certainly do not admire the man (and despised him during election 2K), but he simply got the Gore case because of his reputation which was largely built in the tech industry, and which he has smartly retreated back to it appears. Will be interesting to see what happens, as I don't think the possible infractions listed in the article above will have any impact on his new IBM case.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson