Skip to comments.
U.N. seeking global gun control?
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| Wednesday, July 16, 2003
Posted on 07/16/2003 1:12:55 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: All
Let's keep the Dem's on the run!
Click the Pic!
2
posted on
07/16/2003 1:13:52 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: JohnHuang2
If the U.N. is serious about going after illicit arms, I suggest they first disarm Kofi Annan's security detail. They were busted
here in the United States for possesion of
illegal assault weapons.
But then, it'd become all too apparent that the U.N. has but one intention: disarming every citizen and making them subjects.
-Jay
3
posted on
07/16/2003 1:21:42 AM PDT
by
Jay D. Dyson
(Threaten me? That's life. Threaten my loved ones? That's death.)
To: JohnHuang2
The U.N. wouldn't show up at your door to collect your guns any more than they do when you violate some obscure environazi regulation that has its unconstitutional roots in a treaty that emanated from the U.N. - it will be your local police or state police or federal police that will be knocking on your door, they won't be wearing blue helmets, and you'll be just as dead when it's all over because they'll just be following orders.
4
posted on
07/16/2003 1:41:05 AM PDT
by
agitator
(Ok, mic check...line one...)
To: JohnHuang2
The un is a terrorist organization! Get it out of our country!
To: *bang_list
Get out of the UN BANG!
6
posted on
07/16/2003 3:21:40 AM PDT
by
wysiwyg
(What parts of "right of the people" and "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?)
To: JohnHuang2
Really, is there anything surprising about this? The United Nations is a union of
governments, two thirds of which rule nations that have been classified as
not free. Is there anything a tyrant fears more than an armed populace?
Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit The Palace Of Reason:
http://palaceofreason.com
7
posted on
07/16/2003 4:09:49 AM PDT
by
fporretto
(This tagline is programming you in ways that will not be apparent for years. Forget! Forget!)
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: fporretto
And, moreover, aren't some of those African countries embroiled in horifically deadly civil wars THE LEAST-ARMED civilian populations in the world? I remember seeing a thread indicating so. All this means is that the United Nations wants to give more power to GANGS AND THUGS by elminiating their top deterrent to VICTIMIZING YOU--the fact that you'll shoot back!
As The New York Times is fond of saying, if this happens,
"WOMEN AND MINORITIES WILL BE WORST AFFECTED"
9
posted on
07/16/2003 4:16:24 AM PDT
by
dufekin
(Eliminate genocidical terrorist miltiary dictator Kim Jong Il now.)
To: JohnHuang2
Given the sound support for the USA in the UN by all our so called leaders
this is gonna be a hot issue ...hope the repubs are paying attention
10
posted on
07/16/2003 4:19:57 AM PDT
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: Seret
In a democracy the majority rules. I thought the Supreme Court rules in a democracy...
at least they seem to think they do
11
posted on
07/16/2003 4:41:08 AM PDT
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: Seret
In a democracy the majority rules.It's a good thing then that we live in a Constitutional Representative Republic instead of a democracy,...but then,...I don't think many folks know that.
...and the dumbing down of America continues.
To: Seret
You do realize that a democracy in its purest form is simple mob rule?
13
posted on
07/16/2003 5:29:24 AM PDT
by
Sinner6
(Any one want to buy a chinchilla?)
To: Seret
The UN pretends to be an organization founded on democratic principles. Not a single member there was elected by "the people." All NGOs in the UN are unelected and unaccountable to the people. You cannot start an NGO unless you agree in advance to kowtow to UN dictates and perform accordingly. The UN is a den of liars, thieves and assorted fascist, communist and nazi dictators. Claiming the UN is a democratic institution is akin to calling an old jackass a Kentucky Derby race horse.
To: Seret; Travis McGee
"The UN is an organisation founded on democratic principles. Most of the world doesn't share American attitudes to firearms. In a democracy the majority rules." This is America, where most gun owning citizens could give a rat's a$$ what the UN, or any other country for that matter, thinks about our gun laws.
15
posted on
07/16/2003 6:26:20 AM PDT
by
Vigilantcitizen
(game on in 10 seconds....)
Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
To: Seret; *bang_list
"Sad but true." What's sad noobie is the millions of Jews, Russians, and Cambodians murdered by their governments right after their guns were confiscated.
What's sad is the places in America that have the strictest gun control laws, like D.C., have the highest violent crime rate.
What's really sad, are people like you that have bought the lies of the anti-gunners while being grossly ignorant to the lessons of history.
17
posted on
07/16/2003 7:26:33 AM PDT
by
Vigilantcitizen
(game on in 10 seconds....)
To: agitator
I don't see boue helmets here anytime soon, but I can see being arrested on a trip to Europe when the Belgian prosecuter flags your name and turns it over to the ICC as an illegal weapons owner.
One way or another, this will end in a fight.
18
posted on
07/16/2003 7:40:54 AM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: fporretto
Your post peeled away all the shell and left the bright shiny nut at the center of this debate.
19
posted on
07/16/2003 7:41:52 AM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: Seret
The UN is an organisation founded on democratic principles.Liar. Most of the govts in the UN are thug-ocracies with brutal torturing secret police, where elections are a sham.
Most of the world doesn't share American attitudes to firearms.
Most of the world has never had a chance to express their view in a meaningful way. Do you trust the govt of China, Cuba and Libya to tell you what their enslaved people think about this?
In a democracy the majority rules.
So if 51% of a population votes to "get rid of unwanted minority X" that is okay with you? That is why we live in a constitutional republic, not a pure democracy.
A pure democracy is two wolves voting to have the sheep for dinner. Are you certain you want that?
20
posted on
07/16/2003 7:46:55 AM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson