Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Predicting outcome of conflicts easy if you know who's paying
Fairbanks Daily News-Miner ^ | 7/13/03 | Yelena Matusevich and Samuel Beilin

Posted on 07/13/2003 5:11:17 PM PDT by DPB101

If you want to predict the future of any conflict, find out who is sponsoring it. Terrorism, revolutions and civil wars require large investments. To become a real threat, popular discontent must be used by members of the social elite.

Vladimir Lenin once said that for his cause he could take money from Satan himself. Satan was Germany, with whom Lenin concluded a deal: In exchange for the sponsoring of the Bolshevik revolution, he promised, in case of victory, to sign with Germany a separate peace agreement, ceding to it a huge part of Russian territory and betraying Russia's allies in World War II.

Back then the Communist party emerged as an absolute winner and Russia as an absolute loser. Russia's economic growth, which made her the sixth-richest country in the world, was stopped for a century. Russians ate the poisoned Marxist candy and shut themselves in their domestic concentration camp.

Europeans, always haunted by the threat of the Russian giant at their door, were secretly relieved. However, had those who gave Lenin millions foreseen the results of their "deal," they would have thought twice before doing it. Or would they have?

Recent events in Moscow and in Europe leave this question open, for scary things with a painful "déjà vu" refrain are taking place.

Since 1990, Russia has stood in the way of democracy and, with all its failures, mistakes and wonderings, managed to remain there. Freedom of speech, press and religion are a reality.

The economy is relatively stable, economic growth has improved and the hard currency fund has increased from $11 billion to $61 billion. President Putin succeeded, with great difficulty, to attract investors and stop the massive fleeing of capital abroad. However, all these achievements could be lost after the 2003 parliamentary and 2004 presidential elections.

The threat comes from the Communist Party, for now it has found the most powerful sponsors--14 Russian oligarchs who divided between themselves all of Russia's national wealth and natural resources. Threatened by Putin's will to limit their power and increase their taxation (called taxes on superprofit), they turned to their former enemy--Communists.

First, Boris Berezowsky, a multibillionaire and ex-owner of the channel NTV, now hiding from justice in England, offered Zuganow, the Communist Party leader, an important sum of hard currency. His example was followed by other oligarchs hoping that, in exchange for support, the Communists will vote against Putin's anti-oligarchs' law.

Naturally, the oligarchs don't want the return of communism, but, once in power, the communists will be obliged to fulfill at least some social promises they made to their impoverished electorate.

This is what happened in Chile to the socialist president, Salvador Allende, whose politics led to economic crises and hyperinflation. A similar situation is very possible in Russia.

Threatened by nationalization, capital will flee, followed by hyperinflation and an economic crisis that only could be stopped by a dictator like Pinochet (an extremely popular figure among Russian military). In this case, Russia would complete yet another cycle of tyranny-democratization-tyranny. Unfortunately, very few, if any, seem to understand it.

Russian intelligentsia, by old habit and principle, is generally opposed to Putin, failing to understand that at this historical moment he is the only warrant of stability and democracy. An army of retirees, composing the Communist electorate, is angered by its misery and dream of Communist retribution.

Yabloko and The Union of Right Forces, political parties of the emerging middle class and small businessmen, also oppose the president because they demand the replacement of the presidential republic with a parliamentary one. Therefore, left and right oppositions have met. At the same time the European media, particularly the French, have been eagerly supporting the oligarch Berezowsky, persecuted in Russia for his economic crimes, as a "victim of "dictatorial" Putin, who "wants to suffocate the freedom of press."

Western European newspapers already cheerfully predict Putin's loss in the 2004 elections, and the French left rejoices at Zuganov's future victory, naively believing that the latter has been safely transformed into a civilized socialist. All the dangerous ingredients of a Russian disaster seem to be present: an unhappy military, impoverished masses, greedy oligarchs, out of touch intelligentsia and a delusional European media.

Yet one crucial element is missing: Lenin could use the German bribe only thanks to the chaos of World War I. There is no war to enable Zuganov to use his. Thus, military peace installed by the United States will save Russia from another Communist rehearsal.

Yelena Matusevich is an associate professor of foreign languages at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. Samuel Beilin writes at the Independent Press Center Nevski Zaliv, in St. Petersburg, Russia.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections; Russia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: abramovitch; berezovksy; chernoy; gusinsky; khodorkovsky; oligarchs; putin; russia; smolensky; zuganov

1 posted on 07/13/2003 5:11:18 PM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DPB101
Naturally, the oligarchs don't want the return of communism, but, once in power, the communists will be obliged to fulfill at least some social promises they made to their impoverished electorate.

The oligarches use socialism to enhance their profit potential but have not a clue as to how to control it to keep themselves from being considered the parasites that infest societies that cherish freedom. Sounds suicidal to me.

2 posted on 07/13/2003 5:28:17 PM PDT by eskimo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
These Guys Don't Want You To Donate!

Tick them off! Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

3 posted on 07/13/2003 5:29:07 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eskimo
The oligarches use socialism to enhance their profit potential but have not a clue as to how to control it to keep themselves from being considered the parasites that infest societies that cherish freedom. Sounds suicidal to me.

Me too. When I see guys who have managed to accumulate billions acting stupidly, I back up and ask "What about this do I not understand?" One thing I'm sure I don't understand is Russian politics. Instead of billionaires acting stupidly, I'd bet on billionaires acting smartly in a system that has features we don't even know are features.


4 posted on 07/13/2003 5:41:07 PM PDT by Nick Danger (The liberals are slaughtering themselves at the gates of the newsroom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger; eskimo; TheDon; MEG33; Liz; nopardons; Grampa Dave; NormsRevenge; HISSKGB; ...
The oligarchs are not Horatio Alger stories. This is the Bank of New York, Marc Rich, ex-KGB, Russian Mafiya crowd. They didn't create wealth--they stole it. Now they are hiring muscle to protect it.
5 posted on 07/13/2003 6:06:59 PM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
According to the State Department's travel advisories, the Russian business environment consists of extortion and corruption. American businessmen there often hire private security to prevent their being kidnapped.

The wealth of Russia is owned by mobsters called the Russian mafia. They were aided and abetted in their robbery of Russia by BONY, Mark Rich and the others.
6 posted on 07/13/2003 7:17:53 PM PDT by HISSKGB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
This reminds me of the male black widow spider or the man feeding the crocodile.
7 posted on 07/13/2003 9:27:54 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
Very few people in the US understand that the communists stole from the czarists the single biggest treasure/money pile that had ever been accumulated up until that time.

It made the crown jewels and the english royalty look like a bunch of pikers, relatively. No trace has ever been found, though I suppose the commies used it to spread destruction for the next 60 years or so..
8 posted on 07/13/2003 9:55:02 PM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4US
We are seeing a repeat on several levels, aren't we?

In 1920, John Reed was given between one and two million in diamonds, jewels, gold and artifacts to fence in America to fund the Communist Party USA. Armand Hammer was the Kremlin's most loyal and longest lasting fence. What Bolsheviks couldn't fence, they melted down. In 1931, heavy weight champ Gene Tunney visited a smelter outside Moscow. He wrote:

. . .They had been gorgeous works of art, decorated with bas-reliefs of the saints, the apostles, of Christ, of His parables. Here was a huge bass bell on the sides of which the story of the Annunciation had been told by a sculptor; and near it was another beautified with the story of Bethlehem.

"Probably they'd laugh at me," I said to McClenahan, "but this seems unnecessary. What a shame. How many tons have you in this hill?"

"I don't know," replied McClenahan, "but thus far we've smelted six hundred thousand tons of them for their bronze, gold, silver, copper and so on . . .

I noticed what were bundles of icons of brass, gold, silver and platinum; candelabra of the same metals; holy vessels and altar pieces. They were all in machine-pressed blocks ready for the furnace. On top of this mound I saw what seemed to me to be a man asleep . . .I asked the president of the workers' council about it . . .He winked at another Russian and, catlike, leaped up the hill of confiscated altar pieces . . .He raised his right foot and rolled the prostrate figure over with a thrust of his heel. It teetered on the edge and then came rolling down, crashing in a moment at our feet.

It was a great bronze figure of Christ, a magnificent sculpture. It was more than life size and apparently had been wrenched from its huge cross. . .more


9 posted on 07/13/2003 10:15:43 PM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
Not worry, most middle age and younger not want/hate communists. They not want to be told what to thing/do again. This include most army officers.
10 posted on 07/14/2003 8:15:59 AM PDT by RussianConservative (Hristos: the Light of the World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4US
Not mention what stole from Church in priceless icons/treasures.
11 posted on 07/14/2003 8:18:19 AM PDT by RussianConservative (Hristos: the Light of the World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
Are people in favor of Putin attacking the oligarchs?
12 posted on 07/14/2003 10:11:05 AM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
Oligarchs hated by vast majority of population.
13 posted on 07/14/2003 10:14:32 AM PDT by RussianConservative (Hristos: the Light of the World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative; dix; Grampa Dave; MEG33; Pan_Yans Wife; FreedomPoster; Tamsey; TheDon; ...
Figured as much but was afraid they were using the media to twist people's minds. Good luck to you. Russia deserves better. 90 odd years ago when Russia, the largest Christian country on earth. was moving into the modern age it got smashed back. This time I hope the Russian people smash first.
14 posted on 07/14/2003 12:04:08 PM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
I pray for Russia to be delivered from the communist threat.
15 posted on 07/14/2003 1:48:02 PM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
So true. Marc Rich et al are the worst kind. BTW, was there any group, or special interest that signed on with Lenin to sponsor the Bolshevik revolution?

16 posted on 07/14/2003 6:45:10 PM PDT by dix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dix
I don't know. All sorts of theories are out there. My guess is the intent was more to overthrow the government than put anyone specific in power. The loans to Japan in 1905 really kicked Russia in the teeth. One fairly balanced view is here. Somebody, however, was paying for Trotsky and his thugs to hang around the lower east side of NYC waiting for the call to return. When it came, hundreds of them had the money to buy a ticket back.
17 posted on 07/14/2003 8:20:59 PM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
This source names people responsible for financing the Bolsheviks. It is written without remorse and only tries to justify dealing with the devil. How shameful!
18 posted on 07/15/2003 5:53:35 AM PDT by HISSKGB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: HISSKGB
I skimmed the excuses :-)

Aside from that, the details of the funding are pretty good.

19 posted on 07/15/2003 11:25:31 AM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson