BUT CAN YOU HELP?
Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic
LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO
CA 93794
STOP BY A BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD
It's on the Breaking News Sidebar
Posted on 07/12/2003 8:25:42 AM PDT by Destro
OK, but how many give a rat's @ss?
Gore repeats that Saddam MUST GO - June 2000
Taliban, Clinton, Saudi Involvement - All laid out in a book published in 2000 (from USMC.MIL site)
The Democrats' Case Against Saddam Hussein (Dems nailed, yet again)
Headline Rundown and links on Iraq - Things the democrats have conviently forgot...
Saddam Abused His Last Chance, Clinton -clear and present danger to safety of people everywhere 1998
What the democrats want you to forget
Iraq is a Regional Threat, capable of as much as 200 tons of VX nerve agent (1999 Clinton report)
Czech military reports say iraq has smallpox virus in weapons stockpile (and camelpox)
Iraqi chemical weapons buildup reported (Sept 2001 Report)
Clinton, Gore rally domestic support for strike at Iraq, "unholy axis" (1998 Must read)
statement President Clinton from 1998 on the air strikes
Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 - Full Text, Sense of Congress - Remove Saddam
This poll is damage assesement. RATS always do this. They run propaganda campaigns, then survey the battlefield. Expect more of it. These stats--true or not--will be used to harm American security further.
Indeed, see my last post :)
It is amazing to watch the press ramble and rant about things that are supposition and political commentary, but not investigative reporting. It also betrays the liberal leanings and political slants of the press, once you have some idea of what is known and agreed upon fact, and what is conjecture and supposition.
There is no doubt that Iraq once had WMD and their programs constituted a dire threat, not just to the US, but to the entire world, including the people of Iraq. What has happened to those weapons and programs and materials is in doubt, but their existance and the intent to use them is not.
One does not have to support Saddam to understand that he was no risk and could have been safely ignored. It was not necessary to put our boys at risk or to kill thousands of innocent civilians. Apparently a bare majority understands that already. How many will understand that in November 2004?
The Republicans would be well advised to find another candidate rather than go down with the Bush ship.
This kind of crap is no different than what happened during VietNam.
Editorial after editorial whining about the reason for the war when our men and women were dying for that reason.
There's going to be a big push to get us out of Iraq, the same way the anti-war protestors did during 'Nam.
If it succeeds our children will have another despot to deal with in a few short years.
Don't worry--the Liberaltarians will field a top notch candidate and save us all.
Some day.
Some day.
The day the bong freezes over.
good point!
The war with Iraq is bush's strongest attribute, and his only hope, which isnt much.
The economy, jobs, employment, deficit spending, balance of trade, falling dollar, number of factories closing, number of americans filing bankruptcies, bush's willingness to sign extention of assault weapons bans, increased suseptability of foreign terrorism on american shores, etc are all against bush staying in office.
His tax cut is temporary at best, and only helps those employed. As long as federal government spending is increasing, taxes will go up one way or anothter, the tax cut is superficial. Higher governemnt spending results in more taxes. Higher unemployment means that fewer americans who do work, will have to make up for the taxes not paid by those unemployed. Dont fool yourself, your taxes will go up by what bush has done. Bush has not ended one single federal program, he has not eliminated one single federal department, we still have the department of education, we still have the epa, and now bush will start paying for prescriptions. All these things cost money, and fewer taxpayers will have to pay more and more in taxes.
Why have a republican president who supports gun control and is letting the economy tank while he only seems to be concerned with Iraq?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.