Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA lab in Alabama tests telescope mirror seeking to detect first light of universe
CNews ^ | 07/11/03 | KYLE WINGFIELD

Posted on 07/11/2003 11:27:57 AM PDT by bedolido

HUNTSVILLE, Ala. (AP) - The mission: to build a telescope mirror capable of detecting the first light of the universe that burst forth about 11 billion years ago, but is invisible to human eyes.

And, while you're at it, make the mirror capable of soaring more than a million kilometres from the Earth, but sturdy enough that it bends less than the width of a human hair.

Sound like science fiction? In a tucked-away workspace at Marshall Space Flight Center, NASA technicians are testing two prototypes for a mirror designed to do just that.

The $824.8-million James E. Webb Space Telescope isn't scheduled for launch until 2011. But the successor to the Hubble Space Telescope is already eight years in the making, as technology needed time to catch up with scientists' vision.

"We call it the giggle factor. When you first start talking about putting a mirror like this in space, people laugh at you," said Philip Stahl, a Marshall scientist in charge of making sure the telescope's optics work properly on orbit.

The Webb Telescope - named for the NASA administrator during the Apollo lunar exploration program - is managed by Goddard Space Flight Centre in Maryland, with Northrop Grumman Space Technology as the lead contractor. NASA plans to choose one of the competing mirror prototypes, built by Eastman Kodak Co. and Ball Aerospace, by early fall.

The Marshall centre was chosen to do the testing because it has a test chamber big enough to hold the mirrors, which are about as tall as a two-storey house, and capable of reaching the super-cold temperatures they would face in outer space.

Because the telescope seeks invisible infrared, or heat, radiation, it must be placed in a cold location in space to avoid emitting - and thus detecting - its own heat, Stahl said.

"It's sort of like trying to drive into a sunset," he said. "It's hard to see the road when you've got a lot of stray light. And particularly if you had a dirty window . . . a lot of bug spatter on the car. That would cause you to have a hard time trying to see the image."

To stay cold, the telescope has to be sent some 1.5 million kilometres from Earth - four times farther away than the moon is. Astronauts can't travel that far into space, so NASA will have limited ability to correct problems with the mirrors once the telescope is in orbit, Stahl said.

That fact, coupled with the very public problems the space agency had with the initial images from the much-hyped Hubble, make for a great deal of testing on the ground.

"I like to say, we're not going to repeat the mistakes that were learned on the Hubble with the James Webb. We're going to make our own mistakes," Stahl said. "We don't know what they are yet, but I promise the taxpayers that there will be mistakes, because you can't do what we're doing and not make a mistake."

One safeguard in case of a big mistake is the relatively low cost. A price tag of $800 million might not sound like a bargain, but it's less than the cost of two manned service missions to the Hubble, which are about $500 million each.

Still, the idea is to get it right the first time with extensive testing. Part of those tests include trying to predict how the telescope will bend and warp under such cold temperatures and without the effects of gravity. The margin for error is infinitesimal: the problem with the Hubble, Stahl said, was a matter of six microns of variation in the flatness of the mirror; the average human hair is about 200 microns wide.

These are mind-boggling measurements and problems, but consider the goal of the Webb Telescope. It will begin looking at the farthest reaches of space observed by the Hubble and try to see some 10 billion to 11 billion light years away. Scientists believe that will put them within a half-billion years of the first light of the universe.

Astronomers believe it's that first light - caused by the explosions of the first stars, some two billion years after the Big Bang - that created the elements needed for life: carbon, oxygen, nitrogen and more.

"After that point you can start forming planets, and most importantly start forming organic molecules from which our type of life originated," said Dimitar Sasselov, an astronomer with the Harvard University-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. Sasselov, who studies planets outside our solar system, said the Webb Telescope will help astronomers look for the "signatures of atmospheres and hopefully biological activity" on other planets.

John Mather, senior project scientist for the Webb Telescope at NASA's Goddard Centre, said that while the new telescope will help astronomers fill in some gaps in the knowledge about life's origin, it will have its limitations. Future space telescopes scheduled for launch in 2020 and beyond already are being conceived.

"We will certainly make a step. We certainly will not make the end," Mather said. "We're primarily aimed at the early universe, so it takes a little bit different equipment to do a good job on planets and life."

Still, Sasselov looks forward to the work he and other astronomers will be able to do once the Webb Telescope is in orbit. In the meantime, he's content to seek the planets he'll study when that day comes.

"Eight more years in the 10 billion years that light travels is nothing," he said. "I am patient enough to wait for that.


TOPICS: Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alabama; astronomy; crevolist; first; lab; light; mirror; nasa; space; telescope; tests; universe

1 posted on 07/11/2003 11:27:58 AM PDT by bedolido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bedolido
And they look and look and look... straining.. then, one day: They see a big finger pressing an "ON" switch!
2 posted on 07/11/2003 11:29:12 AM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
It's nice they're testing this one before shooting it up into space....
3 posted on 07/11/2003 11:29:20 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (© 2003, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
She wants to look her best for her subjects.
>

Make a fashion statement. Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

4 posted on 07/11/2003 11:34:15 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Space
Space ping
5 posted on 07/11/2003 11:35:16 AM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido; Cagey; MotleyGirl70
The $824.8-million James E. Webb Space Telescope isn't scheduled for launch until 2011.
But the successor to the Hubble Space Telescope is already eight years in the making, as technology needed time to catch up with scientists' vision.

Put the two together and you'll have the Space Telescope!

6 posted on 07/11/2003 11:40:56 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
I don't know.
I am not in any means a Creationist, but I find that the older I get, the more I cannot buy into the Big Bang theory.
Just a nagging feeling that there is something screwy with the whole notion.
7 posted on 07/11/2003 1:56:33 PM PDT by King Prout (umm, if it is true, why are there any aggregations of matter and energy anywhere?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
isn't that the Hubble from the Hellary days?
8 posted on 07/11/2003 1:57:23 PM PDT by bedolido (Ann Coulter... A Conservative Male's Natural Viagra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Yes. His name is Webb Hubbell... get it? ;)
9 posted on 07/11/2003 1:58:19 PM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
most definately...lol. Wasn't his nickname "Web"... Like Jason Webb from Robert Ludlum's "The Bourne Identity"... mediocre movie, excellent book.
10 posted on 07/11/2003 2:00:32 PM PDT by bedolido (Ann Coulter... A Conservative Male's Natural Viagra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Yeah, his nickname was Web, short for Webster, I think.

That character was named David Webb... I remember because I have lots of Webbs in my family, and one is named David.
BTW, I was really, really into Ludlum as a teenager and was also disappointed in the movie.

Gotta go... have a good weekend!

11 posted on 07/11/2003 2:04:58 PM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
you too. cya
12 posted on 07/11/2003 2:06:33 PM PDT by bedolido (Ann Coulter... A Conservative Male's Natural Viagra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
Right it was Jason Bourne... and David Web... the movie never brought that out
13 posted on 07/11/2003 2:07:24 PM PDT by bedolido (Ann Coulter... A Conservative Male's Natural Viagra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
To stay cold, the telescope has to be sent some 1.5 million kilometres from Earth

Any idea what they are talking about?

14 posted on 07/11/2003 2:13:21 PM PDT by RightWhale (gazing at shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
They're sending it to one of the LaGrange points in order to keep it cooler. Not only will there be less heating from the Earth, but you get more observation time because you don't have a big planet in the way.

Unfortunately, Hubble was inexorably tied to the Shuttle. We could have built three of them and launched them to higher orbits on expendable rockets for the cost of the Shuttle launch and service missions. Of course, the Smithsonian has to have its exhibit in ten years...

MD
15 posted on 07/11/2003 8:57:21 PM PDT by MikeD (up-up-down-down-left-right-left-right-B-A-start)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; Aric2000; Right Wing Professor; js1138; Junior; balrog666; Condorman; ...
ping
16 posted on 07/11/2003 8:59:14 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Way to go Huntsville and Marshall Space Flight Center!
17 posted on 07/11/2003 9:01:17 PM PDT by proudofthesouth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; *crevo_list; RadioAstronomer; Scully; Piltdown_Woman; ...
Excuse the dupicates after js1138's ping.

[This list is for the evolution side of evolution threads, and other science topics. FReepmail me to be added or dropped.]

18 posted on 07/12/2003 4:21:21 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Interesting related stories...

Finding The Ashes Of The First Stars

"Oldest" star found in galaxy

19 posted on 07/12/2003 10:54:52 AM PDT by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Piltdown_Woman
Ashes to ashes, dust to stardust.
20 posted on 07/12/2003 2:22:43 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson