Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Republican fall guy in California: Blame Bush, not Davis, for CA's economic woes (Scheer Alert!)
Salon ^ | July 2, 2003 | Robert Scheer

Posted on 07/01/2003 10:00:45 PM PDT by Dont Mention the War

Opinion
The Republican fall guy in California
California Republicans should blame Bush, not Davis, for their state's economic woes.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Robert Scheer

July 2, 2003  | The other day a woman asked me to sign a petition calling for the recall of California Gov. Gray Davis. Why, I asked. Because he bankrupted the state, she said. When I begged to differ that it was the Bush administration and its buddies at companies like Enron that had put the state into an economic tailspin, she said she was being paid according to the number of petitions signed and didn't really care. But voters should care, because Davis is being used as a fall guy for problems that are beyond his control.

Remember Enron and those other scandals that cost folks their jobs and their 401K savings? They were a result of deregulation, the mantra of the Republicans. Deregulation was most disastrous for California's energy market, in which a crisis cost jobs and threw the world's fifth-largest economy into long-term disruption. This was not the normal workings of the market but the result of market manipulation by officials of Enron and other energy companies, some of whom are on their way to trial.

Still out cruising the boulevards is our president's once close friend, Kenneth "Kenny Boy" Lay. A major contributor to Bush family political campaigns and a former Enron chief executive, Lay invented the energy trading game. It was made possible by his successful lobbying for the 1992 Energy Policy Act, signed into law by the elder Bush. That law allowed a minor Texas company to mushroom into the world's largest energy titan before it went poof.

Daddy Bush also tended to Enron's rise by appointing Wendy L. Gramm to head the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which promptly exempted electricity trading from the regulatory oversight covering other commodities. Gramm went on to serve on Enron's board of directors and its so-called auditing committee. Her husband, Phil Gramm, then a GOP senator from Texas, later pushed through legislation further deregulating the industry.

When the younger Bush ran for president, he turned to Lay, who became the single biggest contributor to Bush's campaign. George W. returned the favor big-time by appointing to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission members who looked the other way when Enron and its fellow swindler companies were fleecing California. These appointees insisted that California's problems were of its own making and would have to be solved without the imposition of the wholesale energy price caps that would have saved taxpayers from a crushing burden.

Vice President Dick Cheney emerged from secret meetings with Enron executives and stated that the administration considered wholesale price caps a "mistake" because "there isn't anything that can be done short term to produce more kilowatts this summer." Either Cheney was lying or his Enron buddies were lying to him: At the time, Enron was routing electricity from California to sell at a higher price in Oregon. Federal price controls would have prevented Enron and the other companies from playing one state against another.

It is disingenuous for California Republicans to now blame Davis rather than their man Bush for the state's economic problems. Only last week, the Republican-dominated FERC banned Enron from selling electricity; it was Enron's punishment for having severely distorted the Western energy markets. Enron and 60 other companies were ordered to show why they should not be forced to return their illegally gained profits.

At the same time FERC said California must honor $12 billion in long-term contracts written under duress with the same companies that were gaming the market. The contradiction was acknowledged by commission chairman Patrick H. Wood III: "I guess people could go, Gosh, these are the same parties that show up in those other [market-gaming] cases."

No kidding. Those companies are being rewarded for scamming the state, which contributed to the budget crisis, and schoolchildren will have to pay the price.

Californians provide much more to the federal government in taxes than they get back in services. The feds should bail out the states, which cannot indulge in the red-ink financing that has become a specialty of the Bush administration.

It is absurd to blame the current difficulties on any state's governor, Republican or Democrat. It is the Bush administration that has mismanaged a successful economy inherited from Bill Clinton. It is the Bush administration that should bear responsibility for the difficulties being experienced by state governments -- and it should at least help California as much as it is helping our newest state, Iraq.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

About the writer
Robert Scheer is a syndicated columnist.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: ca; calgov; california; graydavis; robertscheer; salon; scheer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
There is reality, and there is Planet Scheer.
1 posted on 07/01/2003 10:00:46 PM PDT by Dont Mention the War
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
Scheer proves again he is insane.
2 posted on 07/01/2003 10:04:18 PM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
If Scheer was a horse, he would have been shot and turned into glue by now. What a nut.
3 posted on 07/01/2003 10:04:30 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
What a jackass. Even if everything that he said is true, which it isn't, the amount of money doesn't comapre to the amount of the budget defict.
4 posted on 07/01/2003 10:08:54 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
Glad you posted this from Salon. I won't sign on to the LA Slimes to read Scheer. He is a total nutcase. His remark about the state of the economy that Clinton left for President Bush is scheer lunacy.

The "about the author" bit should read: "Robert Scheer is a constipated sonambulist".
5 posted on 07/01/2003 10:10:51 PM PDT by Theresawithanh (A conservative from the PRC (People's Republic of California))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Dont Mention the War
All I could do is laugh out loud at this idiot. These are the writings of a man the Los Angeles Times has on the payroll. Any questions? Ah ha ha ha ha, ah ha ha ha ha ha...
7 posted on 07/01/2003 10:12:44 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
Scheer is a liberal POS.
8 posted on 07/01/2003 10:12:51 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
Don't you guys know the rule? This one comes from the founder of the Socialist Democratic Party, no less.

"When you tell a lie make it a big one and tell it often."

--A. Hitler

9 posted on 07/01/2003 10:20:12 PM PDT by ElectricRook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

If I were writing for the Los Angeles Times I'd try to write articles that would speak for the conserative or liberal point of view.  I would think this would appeal to the Los Angeles Times editors.  For the life of me I don't understand whose views Sheer are trying to address.

Democrats don't like Bush or conservatives, but as wierd as they are, they do try to speak to at least 40% of the populace.  Sheer can't be speaking for more than a couple of percent of the populace.  His views are so 'out there' there's very little chance of any but the absolute 'fruit loop fringe' buying into his offerings.

This begs the question, why would the Los Angeles Times present this man's views?  Worse yet, why would they pay a man who is often so far out there that you wonder about his sanity?  Where does he come up with this stuff?  I never run into people who express his views.  He must be hybernating in a room at the socialist university of transindental meditation or something.  What it is, I just do not know.

Robert Sheer, how does it feel to have most liberals thinking you're in need of hospitalization lock-down for psychological services, and the conservatives wondering how you escaped in the first place?
10 posted on 07/01/2003 10:25:32 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
Yes, but Scheer is a horse. Just look at him.

His formulations are not horse-like, however. They are ass-like.

11 posted on 07/01/2003 10:29:21 PM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
This guy is another typical leftist/Democrat liar. He forgot to mention a Democrat controlled state government from top to bottom, and that being so, a state economy completely given over to socialist philosophy, from the economy, to the schools and universities, to every other aspect of public policy. Thus, the abject failure of "the state."

If it wasn't so tragic, it would be funny. Ah, hell, I live here and it's funny. Seeing Demos in the Letters to the Editors pissing and moaning because the cuts to "services" and all their other entitlement programs as their big government plans are shrunk by sheer market force. .

Pay attention, America. California will happen to you if you let the Democrats gain any semblence of control. Third world country status and pointing the finger at everybody else as you descend into moral and political squalor.

To The Recall Davis Campaign Headquarters!

12 posted on 07/01/2003 10:36:12 PM PDT by Salem (FREE REPUBLIC - Fighting to win within the Arena of the War of Ideas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
Ok, but then who do we blame for Salon's economic woes?

Salon.com Sued by Landlord-Forfeits $400K Deposit for Decreased Rent, to Avoid Eviction

13 posted on 07/01/2003 11:00:55 PM PDT by optimistically_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
This begs the question, why would the Los Angeles Times present this man's views?

Because Ted Rall only writes columns once a week and they can't afford him, or anyone else anyway?

14 posted on 07/01/2003 11:09:33 PM PDT by optimistically_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy; Joe Hadenuf
Hey, fellas, this guy is right up your alley, and on that very same page!

Enjoy.
15 posted on 07/01/2003 11:15:11 PM PDT by Thorondir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
Are you saying they pay Rall too much? I don't even know who he is. I haven't sat down and read an LA Times in at least three years.
16 posted on 07/01/2003 11:23:47 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Are you saying they pay Rall too much?

If they pay Rall, it's too much.

I haven't sat down and read an LA Times in at least three years.

Good for you, don't start on my account...

Circulation of the nation's 20 biggest newspapers

  1. USA Today, 2,250,474, up 1.8 percent
  2. The Wall Street Journal, 1,820,600, unchanged
  3. The New York Times, 1,130,740, down 5.3 percent
  4. Los Angeles Times, 979,549, down 0.6 percent (a)
  5. The Washington Post, 796,367, down 1.9 percent
  6. New York Daily News, 737,030, up 0.7 percent
  7. Chicago Tribune, 621,055, down 1.1 percent
  8. New York Post, 620,080, up 10.2 percent
  9. Newsday of New York's Long Island, 579,351, up 0.3 percent
  10. Houston Chronicle, 548,508, up 0.5 percent (a)
  11. The Dallas Morning News, 532,050, up 1.1 percent
  12. San Francisco Chronicle, 514,265 (b)
  13. Chicago Sun-Times, 491,795, up 0.9 percent
  14. The Arizona Republic, 486,131, down 2.1 (a)
  15. The Boston Globe, 448,817, down 6.3 percent
  16. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 419,568 (b)
  17. The Star-Ledger of Newark, N.J., 407,730, up 0.3 percent
  18. The Philadelphia Inquirer, 386,890, up 1.5 percent
  19. Star Tribune of Minneapolis-St. Paul, 375,505 (a,b)
  20. The Plain Dealer of Cleveland, 373,137, up 1.3 percent (a)
(a) includes Saturday circulation (b) paper had a change in the number of editions or a change in reporting periods. No comparable figures were provided
17 posted on 07/01/2003 11:40:13 PM PDT by optimistically_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
That's ok... I haven't read that paper either. There's too much that reaches print and has no basis in reality.
18 posted on 07/01/2003 11:41:04 PM PDT by bonesmccoy (Defeat the terrorists... Vaccinate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
Twenty years ago the Times had a circulation of about 1.15 million, as I recall. I sometimes wonder how many actual SFDs get the paper. A lot of the issues are bought for the office, or for schools or for some other group purpose.
19 posted on 07/01/2003 11:44:58 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
Thanks for the listing.
20 posted on 07/01/2003 11:45:28 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson