Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When the Right’s Wrong, What’s Left?
truthnews ^ | 6.10.03 | Gary Nolan

Posted on 06/12/2003 11:41:46 AM PDT by freepatriot32

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 06/12/2003 11:41:46 AM PDT by freepatriot32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
What is the proper role of government? I think it is to be found in the Constitution and it doesn't include about 70% or more of what goes on today.
2 posted on 06/12/2003 11:45:19 AM PDT by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
Libertarian bump. If President Bush signs an extension of the AWB, I'll be voting Libertarian too.
3 posted on 06/12/2003 11:46:13 AM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
WHEN TRUTH BECOMES TREASON

This was written when Clinton was in power and Kosovo was happening.

Jeff

4 posted on 06/12/2003 11:47:47 AM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
This isn't the NY Times - Op Eds should not be posted as Front Page News...
5 posted on 06/12/2003 11:48:11 AM PDT by dirtboy (Not enough words in FR taglines to adequately describe the dimensions of Hillary's thunderous thighs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
Small-l libertarians, yeah... the LP though is a god-awful vehicle for sensible small-government policies though, and its complete inability to take a principled stand on, say, abortion, does not augur well the prospect of having a LP candidate in a serious office.

If these guys were serious, they wouldn't be wasting precious resources on a fantasy Presidential campaign, they'd be using that money to build local and regional organization and influence.

The complete lack of pragmatism in the LP is a fatal flaw. Until that is corrected, expect most serious libertarians to work through the GOP.
6 posted on 06/12/2003 11:48:20 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Road Map = Road Kill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: section9
Thanks, Chris... you beat me to it. Where's that "Awww geez" picture when I need it.
8 posted on 06/12/2003 12:07:15 PM PDT by cspackler (There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
That's all well and good, but out here in California you've got people wanting to elect Riordan, for cripes sake! That's not what I'd call "working through the GOP."
9 posted on 06/12/2003 12:11:34 PM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
Libertarians are unelectable. Politicians with too many principles are unelectable or if elected become ineffective. Politicians who do best are the ones who have basic principles and can compromise on issues.
Idealistic political supporters are often misled because they fail to understand the nature of principles, issues and compronise in politics. Switching parties seldom satifies those too idealistic. It does, however, make them feel good and that they are finally making a difference - for awhile. There's nothing nice or cute in being an effective politician.
10 posted on 06/12/2003 12:11:55 PM PDT by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
I'm not familiar with Riordan... I think I heard the name a few years back, didn't he run for Governor or something in 1996?
11 posted on 06/12/2003 12:25:08 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Road Map = Road Kill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
2002 prmary which he lost.
12 posted on 06/12/2003 12:27:08 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
What's his relevance to the topic then?
13 posted on 06/12/2003 12:28:52 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Road Map = Road Kill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
I think you fail to realize something here. The Libertarians have not had the occasion to find out what concessions and compromise is necessary to, first of all get elected, as well as get vital legislation passed. It can't be all one way. The 50/50 vote split in 2000 is a perfect example of the balance that needs to be considered.
14 posted on 06/12/2003 12:30:26 PM PDT by rj45mis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rj45mis
Yeah, a representative government sucks that way.

Even those I vehemently disagree with are provided equal representation under this fantastic form of government. (not sarcasm)

Compromise is not a dirty word.

15 posted on 06/12/2003 12:35:13 PM PDT by Damocles (sword of...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
Gary Nolan is a candidate for the Libertarian Party nomination for president. If you'd have posted that at the beginning, I could have avoided the 'wading through the irrational sludge' of the author trying to dissemble the bloated federal budget. While I agree the government is way beyond blaoted with waste, I don't consider the 'no answers just slams' approach of Libertarians. Generalizations that don't give detailed approaches to fixing things are easy to write, but vacuous manipulations.
16 posted on 06/12/2003 12:38:16 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
I joined the Libertarians, the party with principle.

Haaa!!!

17 posted on 06/12/2003 12:39:41 PM PDT by k2blader (Haruspex, beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Damocles
Compromise is not a dirty word.

No, but it is very often misused. Many conservative voters and "conservative" politicians don't seem to be aware of the fact that a true compromise isn't just giving the enemy less than he demands, it involves getting something as well.

18 posted on 06/12/2003 12:44:27 PM PDT by Hot Soup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
What's his relevance to the topic then?

He's a big time RINO whose wife and daughters are DemocRATS. I guess some other RINOs want him to run for governor if Davis is recalled.

19 posted on 06/12/2003 12:44:59 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
I do not believe that the Libertarian party is the answer but he sure hit a home run with the other part of his message. I'll guarantee you that an organization totally opposite of the National Endowments of the Arts will be ripped to shreads if Hillary is the pres. So why can't this guy do it? Atrocious!
20 posted on 06/12/2003 1:00:11 PM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson