Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McInnis: Time to act on forest thinning
Daily Camera ^ | May 31, 2003 | U.S. Rep. Scott McInnis

Posted on 06/01/2003 8:03:51 PM PDT by farmfriend

McInnis: Time to act on forest thinning

By U.S. Rep. Scott McInnis
May 31, 2003

Of all the rich natural resources that America has been blessed with, none have greater ecological and social worth than our nation's vast forest treasures.

Some of my fondest memories growing up are of the times I spent on the White River National Forest in Colorado, hunting, fishing, hiking, watching wildlife and recreating with my family.

Tragically are being decimated at an alarming rate by large-scale catastrophic wildfire and massive outbreaks of disease and insect infestation. Each year, millions of acres of once-pristine forestland are ravaged by these pernicious wildland scourges.

From the majestic ponderosa pine forests that define many landscapes out West, to the Appalachian forests east of the Mississippi, and beyond, America is experiencing a forest-health crisis of gigantic proportions.

The cause of this burgeoning environmental disaster is clear: for 100 years the government has aggressively moved to put out wildland fire in all forms, including nature's periodic small-scale burnings that restore and rejuvenate forest ecosystems. The unintended consequence is a century's worth of dense forest build-up that's as close as the next lightning strike from exploding into a massive conflagration.

Forest ecologists and professional land managers increasingly agree that catastrophic wildfire poses an imminent threat to the sustainability of America's forests and the environment around them. In the environmental community, the Nature Conservancy — one of the world's largest and most acclaimed conservation groups — has been a leader in building public awareness about the ecological calamities that catastrophic wildfires often cause.

For proof of this, consider last summer.

The 2002 Hayman fire, the largest in Colorado's history, dumped colossal loads of mud and soot into Denver's largest supply of drinking water, annihilated several thousand acres of cathedral-like ponderosa pine old growth, pushed one globally-rare species to the brink of extinction, and created the worst air-pollution conditions in Denver's recorded history. One scientific study found that the Hayman and Missionary Ridge fires in 2002 combined to pump more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere than did all of the cars, trucks and SUVs in the state of Colorado during the same year combined.

Other massive fires claimed a similarly irreversible environmental toll. Oregon's Biscuit fire destroyed 80,000 acres of prime old-growth habitat for the endangered Northern Spotted Owl, and Arizona's record-setting Rodeo-Chedeski fire caused similar irreversible damage to the endangered Mexican Spotted Owl.

It will take decades to reverse these environmental massacres.

But as bad as the forest-health problem has become, there is still an opportunity to stem this destructive tide.

Using 21st century technologies and ever-expanding scientific know-how, overstocked forests can be returned to a natural balance, and the risks of catastrophic wildfire and insect and disease infestations reduced. Environmental catastrophes like those experienced in recent years can be averted.

The only thing standing in the way now is bureaucracy and red tape.

Of the 190 million acres that scientists identify as being at high risk to catastrophic wildfire, federal foresters will manage fire-prone conditions on only about 2.5 million acres this year because of extraordinarily lengthy procedural and documentation requirements facing management agencies. It takes forest rangers on average several years to maneuver a thinning project through this nightmarish bureaucratic process, even where certain catastrophe awaits.

In one recent high-profile case, the Forest Service had to endure an 800-step decision making process over a 3-year period to implement a management project on overstocked forest lands near a major metropolitan city and its primary source of municipal water. Unfortunately, wildfire eviscerated large swaths of the area before the process was complete, causing enormous damage to the city's source of clean water and destroying a number of homes.

Clearly, this disastrous bureaucratic status quo cannot stand.

On May 20, on a vote of 256-170, with 42 Democrats in support, the U.S. House of Representatives approved bipartisan legislation that Greg Walden, R-Ore., and I introduced to empower land-management professionals to restore at-risk landscapes in a way that honors the imperatives of public participation and protects important environmental values. The bill now heads for the Senate.

The bill's underlying premise is clear: Given the massive scale of the threat that catastrophic wildfire poses to the health of forest ecosystems, wildlife, air quality, water quality and the safety of myriad communities, it is unacceptable that it takes federal land managers upwards of several years to maneuver forest health projects through an endless maze of bureaucracy.

After enduring several destructive fire seasons, it would be a shameful outrage if Congress once again failed to give forest professionals the tools needed to address these crisis conditions.

It is my hope that men and women of good faith can rise above the ideological clamoring that has defined this debate for so long, and pass legislation that makes sense for rural communities and our environment.

Scott McInnis represents Colorado's 3rd Congressional District.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: environment; forests; government; logging; trees

1 posted on 06/01/2003 8:03:52 PM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: risk; marsh2; dixiechick2000; Mama_Bear; doug from upland; WolfsView; Issaquahking; amom; ...
Rights/farms/environment ping.

IF you want to be added or removed from this list, just let me know.

2 posted on 06/01/2003 8:05:06 PM PDT by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kitchen
Poing!
3 posted on 06/01/2003 8:05:28 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex to be managed by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
His faith that a Forest Service bureaucracy, politically and financially culpable for the disaster he seeks to redress, to act objectively, expeditiously, and rationally, is completely misplaced.
4 posted on 06/01/2003 8:09:53 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex to be managed by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
"recreating with my family"

what's that all about?
5 posted on 06/01/2003 8:27:57 PM PDT by diefree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: diefree
I think he is referring to the federally sponsored program, "Participation In Nature Based Recreational Activities"

Also known by the acronym, " PINBRA "

6 posted on 06/01/2003 10:44:59 PM PDT by Drammach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
BTTT!!!!!!
7 posted on 06/02/2003 3:08:45 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Thanks for the heads-up. This in an op-ed released by McInnis a week or so back. Naturally, the commie editor of our local paper failed to find enough column inches to include it for local consumption. Then again, we've only got about 1.7 million acres of fed controlled land in the county. Probably not enough interest in his opinion.

I called Scott's DC office yesterday to see what they could add to the mix. They didn't know squat about the bill's progress the Senate. Maybe I talked to the wrong people. Then I called all the pubbies on the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. Nobody knew squat about the bill, its chances, or timetable to bring it to the floor. They didn't know if it would be referred to the Senate Subcommittee on Forestry Conservation and Rural Revitalization. Cochran's staff passed me off to the committee staff, who didn't have anyone in that knew anything about the bill. One senator's staff said, "The senator's from Iowa, why are you calling from Colorado?" Each was reminded that forest fire season is upon us and there is a sense of urgency associated with H.R. 1904.

All in all, a very depressing waste of a half hour.

For anybody who wants to beat their head against the wall, here's the switchboard number: (800) 648-3516.

8 posted on 06/04/2003 12:58:52 PM PDT by kitchen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson