Skip to comments.
Homosexual Groups Admit ‘10%’ Figure Is Wrong
Traditional Values Coalition ^
| Friday, May 09 @ 15:27:45 CDT
| Traditional Values Coalition
Posted on 05/12/2003 9:23:01 AM PDT by Remedy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 281-285 next last
To: WhiteGuy
the equal part. Besides this is a state issue.
Its amazing how this threat started on the disclosure of a lie and has blossomed to homosexuals prancing in public.
To: longtermmemmory
threat=thread
To: longtermmemmory
Oh....... I guess "the equal part" was the section of the Bill of Rights that I missed.....my bad.
Maybe I'm being too narrow minded.............
After all, I hate the socialists, why shouldn't you be encouraged to hate the "homosexuals".
Sorry!
Keep up the good work! Keep up the Hate!
223
posted on
05/12/2003 9:39:07 PM PDT
by
WhiteGuy
(MY VOTE IS FOR SALE)
To: longtermmemmory
This argument recalls exactly the Romans argument against the Christians:
Of course you're free to practice religion. You just have to worship Caesar.
How pathetic that the descendents of those Christians don't see the irony in how some of them treat the homosexuals today.
224
posted on
05/12/2003 9:45:30 PM PDT
by
shred
To: Libertina
yes...it's all about getting to the children and with all the gay bills passed they have the ability to brainwash the children and they are doing that now.
225
posted on
05/12/2003 9:53:28 PM PDT
by
savagesusie
(Ann Coulter rules!)
To: WhiteGuy
Are you trying to say that state laws are unable to prohibit certain forms of sexual conduct?
What does the prohibition of certain forms of sex have to do with the fact that the 10% figure promulgated by homosexual activists has been a flat out lie? Are we to legalize every sexual behavior demand just because a particular sexual practice feels good to some miniscule part of the population? We limit certain forms of speech, we limit other rights based on the characteristics of individuals. Then again other charateristics tend to be immutable not mere behavioral choices.
To: shred
hardly, the strawman argument does not work. Homosexual seek legitimacy in a completly different arena. The use of the lie of exagerating their numbers was used specifically to not seek only tollerance but acceptance. Students in PC schools risk expulsion for calling some student "gay" or "fag" but should a homosexual practioner call someone a "breeder" the pc police applaud. This is not a religion of conscience. This is a behavior of sex. Legalize homosexuality then as a consistency you MUST and you WILL have to legalize Adult Incest, Polygamy, and Beastiality.
Consider now that the lie is exposed, what are they saying? Oh well it does not matter. Oops sorry. The lie has done its job. They have invaded the public schools, The lie has bought them the legitimacy they needed before it was exposed. The tyrany of the minority is just as great a danger as the tyrany of the majority. Will TV shows now adopt a >1.5 homosexual characters per 100 charaters? not from PC obsessed hollyweird. It is ironic that homosexuality is defined with lies.
To: Kevin Curry
According to the wonderful APA it is entirely possible to prey upon and sexually abuse children and be considered perfectly healthy. Brought to you by the same pointy-heads from liberal institutions who say gay is a-okay.So if It doesnt have anxiety...Poor psychosocial functioning or a negative well being.
Then its OK?
Then can I have sex with my same-sex twin sister?
To: Clint N. Suhks
sarcasm on
as long as you are an adult, you are in a bedroom, go for it.
sarcasm off
To: longtermmemmory
as long as you are an adult, you are in a bedroom, go for it. Whoooohooo
. Bring me my sheep in my PRIVATE barn
sorry I forgot the lambs! (They gots rights too!!!!)
To: NYC Republican
"A woman gets it from the man when they engage in anal sex (and the man is already infected, probably because he's gay but could be a drug user)..."
Unfortunately, when a woman is menstruating or close to it, anal sex is not required for her to be susceptible.
231
posted on
05/12/2003 11:25:42 PM PDT
by
babygene
(Viable after 87 trimesters)
To: DonQ
ROFLMAO.
232
posted on
05/12/2003 11:30:58 PM PDT
by
des
To: NYC Republican
Sorry to repeat myself in the last post. In answer to your question; "It's not an open wound, is it?"
In the classical sense, no it is not an open wound. However, in a very real sense, as the inside surface of the womb breaks down , it leaves a pathway open for the transmission of viruses into the women's blood stream.
233
posted on
05/12/2003 11:39:32 PM PDT
by
babygene
(Viable after 87 trimesters)
To: WhiteGuy
"First it was "regime' change"
Then it was "Disarmming"
Now it's "liberating the iraqi people"
what's next????/ "
Good home page... Niiiiiice... (sarcasm off)
To: longtermmemmory
"the gay studies have been discredited. the " Sorry dude, "the gay studies" (LOL) that I referenced in #66 have not been "discredited" just because you say so. Like any other studies, people with a lot at stake can find something wrong with some of them. If you want to say the study that I referenced is invalid, you have to demonstrate it, just like a thinking adult would.
235
posted on
05/13/2003 4:56:35 AM PDT
by
elfman2
To: Antoninus
"Hmmmm. One would assume that if it were "genetic and unchangeable" as most Homo-Promo cheerleaders proclaim" Who on this thread do you think are these "most Homo Promo cheerleaders", huh? I don't think you're out to defend the fringe on the right that says gays should be rounded up and interned, and I'm not going to try to defend the antithesis among the gay fringe.
I've been told regarding psychosis that after all the "modern treatment" meatheads, about a third get better, a third get worse and a third stay the same. I wouldn't hold that up as a model for sex redirection programs. And I doubt that you'd be happy with a recent "graduate" announcing that he's going to marry your daughter.
Whatever the combination of "biological errors" as Dr. Laura said, and environment as many people on this thread want to focus on, being gay is no more a "choice" than being crazy. (And like with being gay, a few people actually do choose to act crazy some of the time)
236
posted on
05/13/2003 5:18:47 AM PDT
by
elfman2
To: Antoninus
They arrived at the 10% number by polling the NY Times staff. However, the 10% they got were the heterosexuals... LOL. "Oh c'mon, everyone's doing it"
237
posted on
05/13/2003 5:39:00 AM PDT
by
biblewonk
(Spose to be a Chrissssstian)
To: Clint N. Suhks
So if It doesnt have anxiety...Poor psychosocial functioning or a negative well being. Then its OK?It all comes down to self-esteem. Apparently, sexual perversion is okay according to the APA as long as the pervert feels good about him or herself. Why the APA doesn't use the same reasoning to eliminate narcissism as a disorder (by definition, nobody feels better about him or herself than a narcissist) is a mystery.
On the other hand, there has been considerable pressure within the APA to formally classify disgust and revulsion for homosexual behavior as a mental disorder. It is already considered a disorder if the person him or herself experiences feelings of life-affecting anxiety, self-disgust, and self-revulsion over his or her homosexual behavior. What many in the APA would like to do is extend the classification to other people (e.g., Christian conservatives and,presumably, children who have not yet been indoctrinated into the "gay is good" mindset) who have feelings of disgust and revulsion for homosexual behavior.
To: elfman2; Luis Gonzalez; Liberal Classic; RJCogburn; Cultural Jihad
being gay is no more a "choice" than being crazyBetter watch your mouth. Publically expressing an opinion equating homosexuality with insanity will buy you a fine and possibly even some jail time in the coming pro-gay America. Pro-gay bedroom police could even be eavesdropping in on your homophobic private conservations in the home and calling you into account.
It already happens with some frequency in the Netherlands and Canada. I spoke with a Dutch woman who had in her own home expressed disgust for lesbian activity to some neighbors who were there for coffee and a visit. One of the neighbors reported her to the leader of a local Dutch group, a sort of Kommissar of Sexual Freedom, who came to her door with a contingent of supporters, loudly cursed her for being "hateful," and told her they had reported her to the local police for investigation of committing a hate crime. She ended up retaining an attorney who told her to be ore careful about what she said to visitors in her home.
To: Kevin Curry
"Actually, in light of the horrific risks of disease and injury, it is more like mutual assault with sharp, pointy sticks."
Perhaps you should pick up a dictionary. Sodomy includes people of the opposite sex having oral sex. Very few horrific risks of disease or mutual assaults there, at least not when I've been involved in such. Or do you think we should outlaw that?
240
posted on
05/13/2003 6:51:48 AM PDT
by
kegler4
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 281-285 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson