Are Americans Stupid Enough To Follow The Lead Of Anti-War Professors In 2004?

Toogood Reports ^ | April 23, 2003 | Mary Mostert

[Stand Watch Listen]

A group of University professors, prior to the war, organized to oppose President George W. Bush´s determination to oust Saddam Hussein. Their petition, and later full-page ad in the New York Times stated:

"Invasion to replace the Hussein regime is not in the best interests of the United States, the region, or the world. An invasion of Iraq and destruction of the Hussein regime may lead to prolonged instability in Iraq; destabilization of the wider Middle East including the possibility of a prolonged and heightened conflict between Israel and the Palestinians; increased popular appeal of radical Islamic movements and increased anti-Americanism worldwide; and increased terrorism in the U.S. and abroad. Invading Iraq therefore will probably make both the region and the world less secure, not more secure."

You don´t need a university degree to know now that every point made in that petition was wrong. Almost anyone, even kids in elementary school, who have been watching the reports of embedded journalists in the past four weeks now knows that the so-called "Arab Street" in Iraq actually now embrace American Marines and Soldiers and the threat of terrorism in the United States has been reduced. The Middle East region is more secure, not less secure and the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians was not heightened, but lessened. Even as pre-war bellicose North Korea has suddenly decided that perhaps it COULD negotiate an end to its drive to become a nuclear threat.

As recently as January 2003, Phyllis Bennis wrote in an Institute for Policy Studies pamphlet entitled "Understanding the U.S.-Iraq Crisis:"

"UN planning documents anticipate that 500,000 Iraqis would be injured in the early stages of a U.S. war. The UN describes war in Iraq resulting in a crippled nation with shattered infrastructure, electricity grid badly damaged, and major damage to the oil industry. UN reports anticipate civilian damage far beyond that of the 1991 Gulf war, and a resulting refugee crisis."

Iraqi looters, not the military, have done most of the damage to Iraq´s infrastructure. The pamphlet´s warned that "as a result of hostilities, over 1.2 million asylum seekers could attempt to cross international borders to seek refuge and protection in neighboring countries. …New mass displacement would occur in the hardest hit and most insecure areas. Urban areas would be particularly affected." was wrong by at least 1.2 million people. More people have come INTO Iraq than have left it and many of those who have left are being sought for war crimes. The UN planned for "border area transit camps for as many as half a million Iraqis." Those camps remain empty. Considering the magnitude of their wrongness, can we assume that Phyllis Bennis and the professors who signed that petition are now admitting they apparently were misinformed and now support the removal of Saddam Hussein´s regime?

Unfortunately, no, we cannot. On April 3, 2003, before US Troops rode into Baghdad, Bennis and other learned peaceniks endorsed an article entitled: What We Do Now - A Peace Agenda, written by David Cortright, published in the NATION magazine which urged: "We must organize a broadly based campaign to address the causes and consequences of this war and to prevent such misguided adventures in the future."

Cortright complained, "…The Bush Administration claims that the deadly nexus of terrorism and weapons of mass destruction requires a radical new foreign policy of military pre-emption and the unilateral assertion of American technological power. This is the policy being implemented in Iraq. We must offer an alternative vision."

Cortright´s agenda, straight out of the 1960s, then calls for what they had BEEN calling for before the war proved them totally wrong: "We favor vigorous UN weapons inspections to verify disarmament. We call on our government to work diplomatically through the UN Security Council. …" In fact, Cortright´s agenda calls for "The UN weapons-inspection capability" to be "increased a hundredfold and deployed throughout the world to monitor and verify the universal ban on weapons of mass destruction. Nations that refuse to comply with verified disarmament requirements should be subjected to targeted sanctions and coercive diplomatic pressures from the UN and other regional security organizations. Nations that cooperate with disarmament mandates should receive inducements in the form of economic assistance, trade and technology preferences, and security assurances …Our immediate challenge in implementing these short- and long-term objectives is to change the political direction and leadership of the United States…. Our chances of preventing future military disasters depend in the short run on removing the Bush Administration from office and electing a new political leadership dedicated to international cooperation and peace. This is a formidable political challenge."

I can hardly wait until the rest of the world decides to subject the United States to "sanctions" while providing us "economic assistance, trade and technology preferences and security assurances" if we give in to the United Nations and "cooperate." Sanctions didn´t work in South Africa, since most of the European and Asian nations continued selling to South Africa while the United States companies sold their businesses to South Africans at about 10 cent on the dollar. It is obvious from the massive stores of French, German, Russian and other nationality weapons found in Iraq by the American and British troops that sanctions didn´t work in Iraq either.

Besides, who, do you suppose, would enforce those sanctions against the United States and then provide "economic assistance" to us? Germany maybe? Russia? How about France? I doubt it.

I do not think all those University professors actually believe what they are saying. Surely they can´t be that stupid. I suspect, however, they think the rest of us non-university types ARE that stupid and will follow their lead to get rid of George W. Bush in 2004.

While some in my generation may actually follow the University professor peaceniks, I don´t think my grandchildren´s generation is that dumb. And, in 2004 more of my grandchildren and their peers will be voting age. Republican politicians, please take note.

To comment on this article or express your opinion directly to the author, you are invited to e-mail Mary at mmostert@bannerofliberty.com .

RECENT COLUMNS:

04/20/03: The Silent Majority Speaks Up FOR Bush And The Troops
04/16/03: The Elite Media: Comparing Iraqi "Anarchy" With American "Demonstrations"
04/13/03: Do Iraqis Need America, The Arab League Or The UN To Baby-Sit Them?
04/09/03: Should American Christians Die To Liberate Iraqi Muslims?
04/06/03: The Iraqis Will Eventually Judge America By Its Deeds, Not Media Misinformation
04/02/03: From Vietnam To Iraq: Time And Technology Finally Catches Up With Peter Arnett's Propaganda
03/30/03: Can Dust Storms, Chemical Weapons And Lying Media Reports Threaten Operation Iraqi Freedom?
03/26/03: Explaining Why "In Wars People Get Killed"
03/24/03: Operation Iraqi-Freedom Will "Not Be A Repeat Of Any Other Conflict"
03/23/03: Like Thomas Jefferson And James Madison, George W. Bush, Understands Terrorism
03/16/03: Women Show No Compassion In "Is This Not A Baby?" Senate Debate
03/12/03: Time For US To Stop Spending $900 Million A Year On A Useless And Clueless United Nations?
03/09/03: Our Biggest Challenge: Convincing The World George W. Bush Is Not Bill Clinton
03/05/03: The Turks Attempt To Save Face By Attacking America — Again
03/02/03: The Minority Democrats' War In The Senate For Control Of America
02/26/03: Stopping Babies And Other Tyrants From Dumping Garbage In Our Living Rooms
02/19/03: Peace Protesters "Humiliated" Weak Arab Nations
02/16/03: The Democrats' Dangerous Coup de E'tat To Reverse The 2002 Election
02/12/03: France's NATO Veto: A Repeat Of Munich 1938
02/09/03: Real Peace Activists Support George Bush, Not Saddam Hussein
02/05/03: The Bush Deficit Is A Tiny Pebble When Compared To Democrat's Boulder Size Deficits
02/02/03: Is It Time To Scrap Condoms And Back AIDS Prevention Programs That Work?
01/29/03: America's Greatest Dilemma: The Next Election Or Mass Destruction Of American Cities?
01/26/03: Does Sen. Kennedy Really Believe Saddam Is More Trustworthy Than President Bush?
01/22/03: Christian Based Race Relations Versus Marxism Based Civil Rights
01/19/03: Old-Fashioned American Ingenuity Works Better Than Multi-Culturalism
01/15/03: Is Taunting Brides Free Speech Or Sexual Harassment?
01/12/03: The Democrats' Class War Politics Won't Produce Jobs
01/08/03: Frist Will Not Be An Easy Target For The Democrat Spin Doctors
01/05/03: Does America Need Dogs With 5 Legs?
01/01/03: Is Our Conflict With Iraq Only About Oil?
12/22/02: Labor Unions Killed United Airlines
12/18/02: Is Strom Thurmond As Big A Racist As Jesse Jackson?
12/04/02: Three Factors In November Election That Will Change Politics
11/27/02: Democrats Choose Trial Lawyers Over Doctors For Bio-Terrorist Attack
11/20/02: Why Democratic Socialist Pelosi Was Elected As Minority Leader Of House
11/06/02: Did The Voters Choose Class Warfare Or A Change Of Climate In Washington?
10/30/02: Can Democrats Overcome Public Ridicule On November 5th?
10/23/02: Don't Sell Your Stock Until After The Election!
10/16/02: Why Vietnam Era Protests Against The War On Terrorism Won't Work
10/09/02: It's Time To Vote Saddam Hussein Collaborators Out Of The U.S. Congress
10/02/02: Gephardt Uses False Employment Figures For Campaign Purposes
09/29/02: Daschle's Vicious Partisan Political Attack On Bush May Be Backfiring
09/25/02: 9/11 – Did Our Ignoring Clinton's Character Flaws Lead To 9-11?
09/18/02: 9/11 – Could It Be That Florida Democrats Are Too Stupid To Vote?
09/11/02: 9/11 – The 21st Century Equivalent To Pearl Harbor And Bunker Hill
09/04/02: Free Speech Begins Counter Attack On Politically Correct Speech
08/28/02: The Politically Correct Ethnic Cleansing Of White Farmers In Zimbabwe
08/21/02: Like Bush, George Washington Had To Defend Liberty Against Liars
08/14/02: 21st Century Realities Challenge The Clinton Democrats' Left-wing Theories
08/07/02: Goals Of Hitler And Hamas: Annihilate Jews
07/31/02: Is Clinton’s War To Defend KLA Terrorists Unraveling In Milosevic Trial?
07/24/02: Can The Public Have Confidence In The Economy When The Media Lies About It?
07/17/02: President Bush Blocks International Criminal Court Power Grab
07/10/02: For RIO + 10 Environmentalists Announce The Sky Is Falling
07/03/02: Court Declares Liberty And Justice Unconstitutional For School Children

[Stand Watch Listen]

Related Articles

Willful Ignorance: The antiwar Left just doesn't get reality
Source: National Review Online; Published: April 23, 2003; Author: Mark Goldblatt

Out of the 'Quagmire'
Source Insight; Published:| April 14, 2003; Author: J. Michael Waller

The Forces Of Anti-Americanism Seek To Intimidate The Press
Source: Toogood Reports; Published: April 11, 2003; Author: Cliff Kincaid

The Relativist Left and the War: The antiwar movement is a product of the Left's refusal to reason
Source: FrontPageMagazine.com; Published: April 8, 2003; Author: Elizabeth Nickson

Antiwar Greens Given Orders To Use 'Any Means Necessary'
Source: Insight Magazine; Publishe: April 3, 2003; Author: Michelle Malkin

David Horowitz: The war refutes the opposition
Source: Jewish World Review; Published: April 3, 2003 - 30 Adar II, 5763; Author: David Horowitz

Foundation cash funds antiwar movement
Source: The Washington Times: Published: April, 2, 2003; Author: Julia Duin

Greens and Socialists Unite to Oppose War
Source: CNSNews.com Commentary from the National Anxiety Center; Published: April 1, 2003; Author: Alan Caruba

Does Columbia University Hate America?
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: April 01, 2003; Author: | Daniel Pipes and Jonathan Calt Harris

'Anti-American' - Noble Ideas, But Shameful Actions
Source: Toogood Reports; Published: | March 19, 2003; Author: Paul E. Scates

The Left's Dream
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: March 18, 2003; Author: Daniel Pipes

The Fifth Column Left Declares War
Source: Townhall.com; Published: March 18, 2003; Author: David Horowitz

Anti-War Protests Have Big Price Tags
Source: FOX News; Published: March 18, 2003; Author: Dan Springer

The left /fascist 'peace' coalition
Source: The Washington Times; Published: March 17, 2003; Author: Martin Gross

Leftwing "Peace" Saboteurs, Anarchists go Shopping
Source: www.frontpagemag.org; Published: March 17, 2003; Author: Brian Sayre

Ask Dr. Ridgley: What's the Post-War Left to Do?
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: March 14, 2003; Author: Stanley K. Ridgley, Ph.D.

ANSWER's Steering Committee: Traitors, and Commies, and Jew-haters - oh my!
Source: FrontPageMagazine.com; Published: March 12, 2003; Author: Ryan Anderson O’Donnell

"Workers World Party", Other Leftist Orgs Paying For Protests
Source: Fox News Channel; Published: March 12, 2003

Where were critics during Kosovo?
Source: Washington Times; Published: March 11, 2003; Author: Larry Elder

Useful Idiots And Useless Arguments: The Depressing Iraq War Debate
Source: Toogood Reports; published: March 10, 2003; Author: W. James Antle III

Anti-War Activists Map Their Strategy (FR mention)
Source: AP; Published: March 9, 2003; Author: Jeff Donn

Anti-War Or Anti-Reality?
Source: Toogood Reports; Published: March 5, 2003; Author: Paul E. Scates

Barbara Stanley: America: Land Of The Free, Even Free To Be Traitors
Source: Toogood Reports; Published: February 28, 2003; Author: Barbara Stanley

Congress Mulls Probe of Communists' Ties to Appeasement Movement, Radical Islam
Source: NewsMax.com; Published: February 28, 20003; Author:| Wes Vernon

Exposing the Anti-War Movement, Part I: MoveOn.org
Source: Citizens for Fair and Balanced Funding; Published: February 28, 2003; Author: David Ware

If antiwar protesters succeed (by Iraqi citizen)
Source: CS Monitor; Publisghed: February 26, 2003; Author: unsigned opinion

Marxist Groups in the Anti-War Movement
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: February 25, 2003; Author: Paul M. Weyrich

Anti-war Protestors: Shades Of Stupidity
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: February 21, 2003; Author: Rachel Marsden

Who's Paying for It All? [re: anti-war demostrations]
Source: INSIGHT magazine; Published: February 18, 2003; Author: J. Michael Waller

Anti-War Protestors Are Warmongers for Our Enemies
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: February 11, 2003; Author: Alex Epstein

The Peace Movement’s Mumia Connection
Source: National Review; Published:| January 28, 2003; Author: Byron York

Reds Still [re: The story no one wants to hear about the antiwar movement]
Source: National Review; Published: January 23, 2003; Author: Byron York

[Vets_Husband_and_Wife]

Great article FRiend. Here is another one that mentions a member of the "higher education" crowd. Wait until you hear what he says about HISTORY and teaching his students HISTORY when he is a BUSINESS Teacher!!

Read on,...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/898132/posts

[Bigg Red]

Wow! Nice index. Thanks.

[anniegetyourgun]

"I do not think all those University professors actually believe what they are saying. Surely they can´t be that stupid."

Yes, they are true believers - blinded by their white-hot hatred for President Bush.

[T Lady]

This is yet another example of the Left's refusal to accept the fact that George W. Bush, President of the United States, is not only a man of his word, but is also insightful and intelligent. The fact that the war in Iraq didn't turn into the quagmire these ninnies were hoping for has just driven them farther into the realms of insanity.

-Regards, T.

[dark_lord]

No one ever went bust underestimating the intelligence of the American people. And lets not forget the short attention span. In 6 months all we will hear about the Iraq situation will be how the Shiites have democratically elected leaders that want us out pronto, and we should turn everything over to the UN to reduce our costs.

[Congressman Billybob]

As I set out in my latest column, there remain "pockets of resistance" which need to be mopped up, now that the Iraq War has been won. One of those "pockets" is in American universities, and I use Columbia ("a million Mogadishus") and UCLA (Faculty Senate vote 180-7 against the war) as prime examples. Had I known about it when writing my article, I could have used my own university, Yale, as another example (a professor called two students "Fedayeen Uncle Sams" for accurately writing about an "anti-war" meeting).

Those interested in this subject will appreciate my latest column, (First link, below.)

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, now up on FR, "Who's Next?"

Latest book(let), "to Restore Trust in America."

[Egregious Philbin]

An invasion of Iraq and destruction of the Hussein regime may lead to prolonged instability in Iraq; destabilization of the wider Middle East including the possibility of a prolonged and heightened conflict between Israel and the Palestinians; increased popular appeal of radical Islamic movements and increased anti-Americanism worldwide; and increased terrorism in the U.S. and abroad. Invading Iraq therefore will probably make both the region and the world less secure, not more secure.

Only time will tell if their predictions are incorrect. It's too soon for this author to write off those fears.

[LiteKeeper]

read later

[Prince Hal]

While there may be lots of "sheeples", there has been a huge cultural shift in this country. Not only post 9/11, but resentment that the left tells us how to think, controls our tv and press, and gets the lion share of ink about whatever their hot issue of the day is.

The resentment is clear from the success of FR, Rush, Fox, the best selling books by various conservative authors etc... Still amazed that the "main stream" media and culture hasn't changed gears except for a Rupert Murdoch, a Dennis Miller and a few thoughtful leftish writers.

[Vets_Husband_and_Wife]

Bumping your post #7, and saying thanks for pinging us to these articles.

FRegards, Vets