Skip to comments.
CNN's disinformation campaign
Washington Times ^
| 4/15/03
Posted on 04/14/2003 9:50:31 PM PDT by kattracks
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:02:37 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Yesterday, CNN executive Eason Jordan claimed that the network had not covered up evidence of atrocities in Saddam Hussein's Iraq because it wanted to ensure access, but because it was worried about putting people's lives in danger. Writing on today's Op-Ed page, former CNN Baghdad correspondent Peter Collins, who personally witnessed Mr. Jordan and network President Tom Johnson unsuccessfully begging for an interview with Saddam, makes a strong case that Mr. Jordan is lying when he denies that ensuring access was a motive for CNN's shading of the truth on Iraq.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: easonjordan
1
posted on
04/14/2003 9:50:31 PM PDT
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
No blood for ratings, indeed.
2
posted on
04/14/2003 9:56:15 PM PDT
by
Choose Ye This Day
(Love, peace, and harmony: Very nice, very nice, very nice...but maybe in the next world.)
To: All
God Bless America! God Bless This Man! Some of us VRWC volunteers think freedom is worth fighting for.
|
|
Please join us.
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3
posted on
04/14/2003 9:56:37 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: kattracks
No careful viewer can trust CNN's reporting on international affairs. Why should I trust their reporting on domestic affairs any more? If they're willing to break the most basic rules of human morality in order to score some cheap media hype in one area (ooh, look, we got a bureau in Baghdad and you don't, nyah!), then they're willing to break the rules in any area.
4
posted on
04/14/2003 10:00:06 PM PDT
by
Timesink
To: kattracks
Through fraudulent reporting, CNN has given aid and comfort to our enemy. Over the years, fraudulent reporting has shaped public opinion in ways beneficial to the enemies of democracy and American ideals. Is this not treason?
To: Timesink
Oneupsmanship is the only reason to prostitute themselves for a liefest interview with some Iraqi big shot. They say women really dress for the approval of other women; well, media types sell out to top their competitors - who don't seem to mind, until now, that they got beaten out by cheaters.
Other than this the only thing to gain from this is a live shot of downtown Baghdad. Shoot, it'd be less dishonest to use the Cokie Roberts method of standing in front of a picture of the Capitol and calling it a live shot.
To: Lion Den Dan
None Dare Call It.
7
posted on
04/14/2003 10:09:58 PM PDT
by
gcruse
(If they truly are God's laws, he can enforce them himself.)
To: kattracks
Hey CNN, did you warn the Iraqis you hired of the danger you knew they would be in?
8
posted on
04/14/2003 10:11:58 PM PDT
by
Ken H
To: Ken H
Even worse, did they inform their own reporters that they sent over there.
9
posted on
04/14/2003 10:23:07 PM PDT
by
Howlin
(It's a great day to be an American -- or an Iraqi!)
To: gcruse
None Dare Call It. Aw, gee whiz. I'll stand up and call it what it is
TREASON
To: kattracks; MNLDS
11
posted on
04/15/2003 5:09:21 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
To: kattracks
Here's Peter Collins' op/ed that the article discusses:
Corruption at CNN
Peter Collins
Mr. Eason Jordan's admission that CNN had to suppress the news from Baghdad in order to report it brought back memories for me.
In January 1993, I was in Baghdad as a reporter for CNN on a probationary, three-month contract. Previously, I had been a war reporter for CBS News in Vietnam and East Asia and in Central America for ABC News. I had also made three trips to Baghdad for ABC News before the Gulf War.
Now, Bill Clinton was about to be inaugurated and there was speculation that Saddam Hussein might "test" the new American president. Would the new administration be willing to enforce the "no-fly" zones set up in northern and southern Iraq after the Gulf War?
CNN had made its reputation during the war with its exclusive reports from Baghdad. Shortly after my arrival, I was surprised to see CNN President Tom Johnson and Eason Jordan, then chief of international news gathering, stride into the al-Rasheed Hotel in Baghdad. They were there to help CNN bid for an exclusive interview with Saddam Hussein, timed to coincide with the coming inauguration of President Clinton.
I took part in meetings between the CNN executives and various officials purported to be close to Saddam. We met with his personal translator; with a foreign affairs adviser; with Information Minister Latif Jassim; and with Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz.
In each of these meetings, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Jordan made their pitch: Saddam Hussein would have an hour's time on CNN's worldwide network; there would be no interruptions, no commercials. I was astonished. From both the tone and the content of these conversations, it seemed to me that CNN was virtually groveling for the interview.
The day after one such meeting, I was on the roof of the Ministry of Information, preparing for my first "live shot" on CNN. A producer came up and handed me a sheet of paper with handwritten notes. "Tom Johnson wants you to read this on camera," he said. I glanced at the paper. It was an item-by-item summary of points made by Information Minister Latif Jassim in an interview that morning with Mr. Johnson and Mr. Jordan.
The list was so long that there was no time during the live shot to provide context. I read the information minister's points verbatim. Moments later, I was downstairs in the newsroom on the first floor of the Information Ministry. Mr. Johnson approached, having seen my performance on a TV monitor. "You were a bit flat there, Peter," he said. Again, I was astonished. The president of CNN was telling me I seemed less-than-enthusiastic reading Saddam Hussein's propaganda.
The next day, I was CNN's reporter on a trip organized by the Ministry of Information to the northern city of Mosul. "Minders" from the ministry accompanied two busloads of news people to an open, plowed field outside Mosul. The purpose was to show us that American warplanes were bombing "innocent Iraqi farmers." Bits of American ordinance were scattered on the field. One large piece was marked "CBU." I recognized it as the canister for a Cluster Bomb Unit, a weapon effective against troops in the open, or against "thin-skinned" armor. I was puzzled. Why would U.S. aircraft launch CBUs against what appeared to be an open field? Was it really to kill "innocent Iraqi farmers?" The minders showed us no victims, no witnesses. I looked around. About 2000 yards distant on a ridgeline, two radar dishes were just visible against the sky. The ground was freshly plowed. Now, I understood. The radars were probably linked to Soviet-made SA-6 surface-to-air missiles mounted on tracks, armored vehicles, parked in the field at some distance from the dishes to keep them safe. After the bombing, the Iraqis had removed the missile launchers and had plowed the field to cover the tracks.
On the way back to Baghdad, I explained to other reporters what I thought had happened, and wrote a report that was broadcast on CNN that night.
The next day, Brent Sadler, CNN's chief reporter at the time in Baghdad (he is now in northern Iraq), came up to me in a hallway of the al Rasheed Hotel. He had been pushing for the interview with Saddam and had urged Mr. Johnson and Mr. Jordan to come to Baghdad to help seal the deal. "Petah," he said to me in his English accent, "you know we're trying to get an interview with Saddam. That piece last night was not helpful."
So, we were supposed to shade the news to get an interview with Saddam?
As it happens, CNN never did get that interview. A few months later, I had passed my probationary period and was contemplating my future with CNN. I thought long and hard; could I be comfortable with a news organization that played those kinds of games? I decided, no, I could not, and resigned.
In my brief acquaintance with Mr. Jordan at CNN, I formed the impression of a decent man, someone with a conscience. On the day Mr. Jordan published his piece in the New York Times, a panel on Fox News was discussing his astonishing admissions. Brit Hume wondered, "Why would he ever write such a thing?" Another panelist suggested, "Perhaps his conscience is bothering him." Mr. Eason, it should be.
Peter Collins has more than 30 years of experience in broadcast news, including outlets such as the Voice of America, BBC, CBS, ABC and CNN.
To: kattracks
After that Operation Tailwind BS a few years back, I'm surprised there's a single FReeper still watching the Communist News Network. CNN lies...period.
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
13
posted on
04/15/2003 5:24:10 AM PDT
by
wku man
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson