Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Analysis: Garofalo-bashing? (Hollyweird Whine Alert)
UPI ^ | 4/10/03 | Pat Nason

Posted on 04/13/2003 10:21:28 AM PDT by jimbo123

LOS ANGELES, April 10 (UPI) -- As Iraqis celebrate their newfound freedom to debate and question authority some Americans remain intent on depriving fellow citizens of the same right.

Call it ironic or call it absurd, but Janeane Garofalo's political enemies are doing their best to punish her for exercising her freedom to speak -- even as they cheer the U.S. campaign to secure that same freedom for the people of Iraq.

MSNBC gossip columnist Jeannette Walls has reported that ABC has been deluged with telephone calls and e-mail messages threatening to boycott the network and its sponsors if the network adds an upcoming Garofalo show to its prime time schedule.

Garofalo is scheduled to star in a comedy pilot -- yet to be shot -- called "Slice 'O Life," as a producer on a TV newsmagazine show. The pilot was being considered as a possible midseason replacement at ABC.

Network officials said Thursday that ABC, which is owned by the Walt Disney Co., would not comment on the MSNBC story.

A representative for Garofalo did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

One protesting e-mail sender, identified in the MSNBC story as Jon Alvarez, suggested that Garofalo was a traitor.

"We do not wish to see the faces of liberal Hollywood, particularly those that provided aid and comfort to (Iraqi leader) Saddam Hussein," he wrote. "We will stand up and fight for our right to request their exclusion from shows and sponsors that seek our attention."

The New York Post, which has been very energetic in its condemnation of high-profile critics of President Bush, picked up the MSNBC story and ran it with the headline: "The high cost of Bush-bashing."

The paper also reported that executives at Pepsi and Unilever are debating whether to air a commercial that the Dixie Chicks shot for Lipton Brisk. The ad was made before the trio's lead singer, Natalie Maines, landed on the American right's enemies list with a remark that the Chicks were ashamed to be from the same state as Bush, Texas.

Maines apologized, but forgiveness for the Chicks has been hard to come by in the world of country music.

Now comes word that the baseball Hall of Fame has canceled a 15th anniversary celebration of "Bull Durham," citing highly publicized anti-war statements by two of the movie's stars -- Susan Sarandon and Tim Robbins.

Robbins played the callow minor league pitcher "Nuke" LaLoosh in writer-director Ron Shelton's 1988 baseball comedy. Sarandon played Annie Savoy, a baseball groupie who tutors LaLoosh in the ways of the game.

Hall president Dale Petroskey -- who once worked as an assistant press secretary during the Reagan administration -- notified Sarandon and Robbins that their opposition to the war could jeopardize U.S. troops, according to a report in the Los Angeles Times.

"We believe your very public criticism of President Bush at this important -- and sensitive -- time in our nation's history helps undermine the U.S. position, which ultimately could put our troops in even more danger," wrote Petroskey. "As an institution, we stand behind our president and our troops in this conflict."

It is only natural that supporters of Bush and Operation Iraqi Liberty would be upset with opponents of the president and the war. Whether the war's opponents have engaged in treason remains highly debatable, but criticizing the president -- even in time of war -- falls considerably short of that standard.

And yet, president-bashing -- which was widely treated as sporting fun during the previous administration -- now seems to have joined a growing list of unforgivable political offenses in America.

Would any American seriously wish to live in a country where expressing a political point of view is a punishable offense?

The question -- which has been around for a while -- is getting quite a workout these days.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cow; garofolo; hollyweird
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
Boo-hoo.
1 posted on 04/13/2003 10:21:28 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

Put a smile on your face, donate to FR today!

(Thanks Chance33_98 for the ad)

2 posted on 04/13/2003 10:22:53 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
This is sirius

3 posted on 04/13/2003 10:23:30 AM PDT by ChadGore (HEY CNN: No Blood for ratings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
These folks don't understand the First Amendment. You can say what you want, doesn't mean I have to listen or can't act differently toward you because of what you said.
4 posted on 04/13/2003 10:24:57 AM PDT by wastoute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Garofalo's political enemies are doing their best to punish her for exercising her freedom to speak

No, we are exercising OUR freedom to speak by calling Ms. GodAwfulHo a LIAR, who has been PROVEN WRONG, and who refuses to admit it. If someone in the public eye chooses to speakout, they must be prepared for rebuttal. PERIOD.

5 posted on 04/13/2003 10:26:58 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Where can I e-mail Pepsi and Unilever? It's on my must-do list now.
6 posted on 04/13/2003 10:29:29 AM PDT by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Why is anyone surprised that ABC would give Garbarfalo a forum? They give Peter Jennings one five nights a week.
7 posted on 04/13/2003 10:30:55 AM PDT by geedee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastoute
Would any American seriously wish to live in a country where expressing a political point of view is a punishable offense?

Interesting, they never bring up Dr. Laura, John Rocker, or Trent Lott. All of who stated opinions that leftists didn't like.

Too bad for them. The mood has changed, and thanks to talk radio, Fox news and Free Republic we will never be silent again.

8 posted on 04/13/2003 10:31:10 AM PDT by Betty Jane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Dear UPI! Damn MLK for starting all those boycots! Lifes a bitch.
9 posted on 04/13/2003 10:31:26 AM PDT by cksharks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Would any American seriously wish to live in a country where expressing a political point of view is a punishable offense?

There is a VAST difference between 'punishment' than Americans making a CHOICE not to support these people when they make unAmerican comments which aid our enemies.. Guess they are not really PROCHOICE huh?

10 posted on 04/13/2003 10:31:30 AM PDT by Zipporah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Freedom Of Speech Avenue Is A Two Way Street

11 posted on 04/13/2003 10:32:46 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
What baloney. Supposedly consumers should have no right to withhold their entertainment budgets from Hollywood cretins who do not share their deeply-held values. File this report under: "Actions Have Consequences."
12 posted on 04/13/2003 10:32:52 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
This is so childish...These anti-bush, pro-UNatanycost no nothing big mouthed actors want to point out they have "Freedom Of Speech", and spew their vitriol, but do not want to take responsibility for their stances. They are cowards, and selfish crybabies!

Ms G hasn't eaten enough crow yet!

Can someone like Registered make a Deck Of Cards of these Leftist Regime Ignorant Freaks? I'll be glad to post them up all over town!!

13 posted on 04/13/2003 10:33:09 AM PDT by sirchtruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Freedom requires consequences. Freedom does not mean license to do whatever you want (or say whatever you want) without having to endure the reaction from others who oppose your views.

If these hollywood nitwits were imprisoned for what they said they might have a point. However, the people who disagree with them have just as much right to express their opposition as the hollywood nitwits. If this opposition includes product boycots, picketing, or refusal to be invited to parties - these hollywood nitwits should have the intellectual honesty to accept the consequences of thier opposition.

These hollywoods nitwits want to yell, scream, obstruct, destroy, and break the law and then walk away to Starbucks for an after protest latte - and whine vociferously when they are called to account for their behavior.

These hollywoods nitwits are just a continuing manifestation of the Left's philosophy that their ends justifies any means and that the law is for everyone else but themselves. These hollywoods nitwits serve as a reminder of the dangers of the Left's mindset and their "Saddam like" willingness to do whatever it takes to impose their hegemony on America.

14 posted on 04/13/2003 10:33:16 AM PDT by jimkress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
"Maines apologized, but forgiveness for the Chicks has been hard to come by in the world of country music." Maines did not apologize- she issued a statement which was probably written by a publicist and, if recent reports are correct, she has countermanded by further utterances.
We are just doing what one of our great heroes did. Like Rosa Parks we are engaged in an economic boycott against those that would injure our cause- Americanism.
15 posted on 04/13/2003 10:35:11 AM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
She's more famous now than she would have ever been just acting. She'll never be unemployed again.
16 posted on 04/13/2003 10:36:30 AM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
...some Americans remain intent on depriving fellow citizens of the same right.

No, clymer, freedom of speech is still her right; no government entity has jailed her or otherwise curtailed her speech.

We Americans, on the other hand, are merely taking the opportunity to actively shun someone whose behavior is offensive to us. No one has lost any righs in the process.

Gee, wouldn't you think that a news service would require that its commentators have at least a rudimentary grasp of civics? My sense of astonishment at this writer's line of thinking shows, I guess, that I have been overrating UPI here of late.
17 posted on 04/13/2003 10:36:41 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Beware the Fedayeen Rodham!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
"Call it ironic or call it absurd, but Janeane Garofalo's political enemies are doing their best to punish her for exercising her freedom to speak -- even as they cheer the U.S. campaign to secure that same freedom for the people of Iraq."

So by implication, those of us who disagree with the hypocritical little liar and don't want her verbal diarrhea to be given constant press should shut up and not exersize OUR OWN RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH.

Our military paid the price in blood so that Garafolo can parrot mindless Third Way, 'hip' rhetoric. Our military paid the price in blood to insure that masked anarchists can carry banners in California telling the world our troops should kill their officers. Our military paid the price in blood so the Pat Nason's of the world can parrot Clintonista relativism until they're blue in the face,

Likewise, our military paid the price in blood to ensure that we who hold a dissenting viewpoint can air that view, because WE were also guaranteed by the blood of our sons the same right to free speech as the laftist idiots who get all the TV facetime.

We are NOT gonna shut up. Shutting up gave us eight years of Bill Clinton.

I wish I had Pat Nason's email.

Remember to donate to FR, the biggest, best, most popular place to exercise freedom of speech in the world.

18 posted on 04/13/2003 10:36:45 AM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions=Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

19 posted on 04/13/2003 10:37:05 AM PDT by areafiftyone (Is he dead yet? He's dead Jim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
There is no government sponsored agenda to get Garofalo--this is a grassroots effort taken on by free citizens to exercise their 1st amendment rights. Freedom of speech doesn't guarantee freedom from being criticized or boycotted or ignored or shunned or ridiculed. I know it irks the left but we get the same rights that they do.
20 posted on 04/13/2003 10:37:26 AM PDT by beaversmom (After the Axis of Evil on to the Axis of Weasels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson