Ruined Snow Penis Stimulates Debate (Loony Feminist Alert!)

Harvard Crimson ^ | Monday, February 24, 2003 | HANA R. ALBERTS

[templar]

Do you object to, on principal, any displays of the human anatomy on public ...

My position should be clear. Public nudity offends our public morals and is inappropriate. It's usually illegal as well. Go expose yourself to someone in public and you'll find out about this (p.s. this is rhetorical, don't actually do it).

[driftless]

So then I assume you are against a large majority of the world's great paintings and sculptures displayed in museums and public squares...like Michaelangelo's "David" for instance?

[templar]

...like Michaelangelo's "David" for instance?

You're being an idiot. This has nothing to do with the display of an erect penis in a public place.

You can go away now.

[driftless]

Tsk, tsk, such language!! Idiot??!!! How novel! Can't give a straight answer, so in comes the ad hominem attacks. To end it all just let me say PLEASE GET OVER YOURSELF!!!

[lawdude]

Hmmm. I get really funny feeling when I go into a tunnel!

[Lorianne]

Phallic Rock on Molokai, Hawaii is right on a main hiking trail where little kids can see it! Of course it's been there for HUNDREDS of years. But please, don't tell the Harvard penis de-erectors, yikes!

See naughty picture of Phallic Rock, ancient Hawaiian fertility site, here:

http://www.alternative-hawaii.com/special/molc.htm


__________________