Address the issues, you say?
Under the circumstances, I cannot imagine any issue more pressing than whether or not Iraq had a hand in the 1995 Oklahoma bombing and the 1993 and 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center. When I raised these issues with Raimondo, he dismissed me as a "kook."
Raimondo's utter lack of curiosity on these vital questions leaves me with no choice but to wonder whose side he is really on.
How about you? Do you care who masterminded the last ten years of terror attacks against our country? Or do you find that an irrelevant detail, compared with the overriding goal of keeping Raimondo in the... er, what did you call it? The Tent?
Well, I can.
'Where's Bin Laden?' seems much more pressing, to me. But the core issue is that, out of all the enemies of conservatism against which you could have directed your pen, you chose Raimondo, who is on all the major indices himself a conservative. Can't someone of your capabilities find a lib to lead the charge against? And you did it in a rhetorical and rabble-rousing manner. If you really think Raimondo's an 'enemy agent' then go tell the FBI, Richard.