Hum.
1 posted on
02/03/2003 5:00:10 PM PST by
vannrox
To: vannrox
"Hum."
Ho.
2 posted on
02/03/2003 5:21:00 PM PST by
F.J. Mitchell
(truth is the life blood of productive discourse)
To: vannrox
The folks at Time are still hoping to find something that will shake up the foundations of Christianity. That was one of the reasons the Dead Sea Scrolls were so popular when they were first discovered and why people like Edmund Wilson wrote about them with such enthusiasm. But there really isn't much resemblance between the Essenes and the early Christians. John the Baptist as he is portrayed in the Gospels bears no resemblance to what little we know about that sect.
3 posted on
02/03/2003 6:18:47 PM PST by
Cicero
To: vannrox
They found John the Methodist.
To: vannrox
To read later.
8 posted on
02/03/2003 10:12:35 PM PST by
Salvation
(+With God all things are possible.+)
To: vannrox
Thanks.
11 posted on
02/04/2003 3:28:57 AM PST by
happygrl
To: vannrox
On display in Topkapi Palace in Istanbul, Turkey, is
what is reputed to be the hand, forearm, and a piece
of skull from John the Babtist. Don't know where the
rest of him is.......
12 posted on
02/04/2003 7:17:09 AM PST by
G-Bear
To: vannrox
>Have archaeologists discovered the skeleton of John the Baptist?"
Is the skull smiling
enigmatically? Do the
fingers point upward?
15 posted on
09/30/2006 8:56:36 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(If I had a nut allergy, I'd be outta here. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson