Posted on 12/22/2002 3:40:59 PM PST by joesnuffy
MUCH ABOUT HISTORY Feds fixing 'Southern bias'at U.S. parks Officials look to emphasize horrors of slavery at Civil War battlefields
Posted: December 22, 2002 4:01 p.m. Eastern
© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com
The National Park Service is looking to rid itself of what it calls Southern bias at major Civil War battlefields and instead emphasize the horrors of slavery.
According to Reuters, ground zero for the project is Gettysburg, site of the largest battle ever fought on American soil. Plans are going ahead to build a new visitors center and museum at a cost of $95 million that will completely change the way the conflict is presented to visitors.
"For the past 100 years, we've been presenting this battlefield as the high watermark of the Confederacy and focusing on the personal valor of the soldiers who fought here," said Park Superintendent John Latschar.
"We want to change the perception so that Gettysburg becomes known internationally as the place of a 'new rebirth of freedom,"' he told Reuters, quoting President Abraham Lincoln's "Gettysburg Address" made on Nov. 19, 1863, five months after the battle.
"We want to get away from the traditional descriptions of who shot whom, where and into discussions of why they were shooting one another."
The project follows the furor over Republican Sen. Trent Lott's recent remarks which some felt endorsed racial segregation, prompting many Americans to revisit one of the uglier chapters of the nation's history.
When it opens in 2006, the new museum will offer visitors a narrative of the entire Civil War, putting the battle into its larger historical context. Latschar said he was inspired by the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington D.C., which sets out to tell a story rather than to display historical artifacts behind glass cases.
"Our current museum is absolutely abysmal. It tells no story. It's a curator's museum with no rhyme or reason," Latschar said.
Approximately 1.8 million people visit Gettysburg annually. Latschar said a disproportionate number were men and the park attracts very few black visitors.
Three historians were invited to examine the site in 1998, and they concluded Gettysburg's interpretive programs had a "pervasive southern sympathy."
The same was true at most if not all of the 28 Civil War sites operated by the National Parks Service. A report to Congress delivered in March 2000 found that only nine did an adequate job of addressing slavery in their exhibits.
Another six, including Gettysburg, gave it a cursory mention. The rest did not mention it at all. Most parks are now trying to correct the situation.
Park rangers and licensed guides at Gettysburg and other sites have already changed their presentations in line with the new policy. Now, park authorities are taking a look at brochures, handouts and roadside signs.
According to Dwight Pitcaithley, chief historian of the National Park Service, the South had tremendous success in promoting its "lost cause" theory.
The theory rested on three propositions: that the war was fought over "states' rights" and not over slavery; that there was no dishonor in defeat since the Confederacy lost only because it was overwhelmed by the richer north; and that slavery was a benign institution and most slaves were content with their lot and faithful to their masters.
"Much of the public conversation today about the Civil War and its meaning for contemporary society is shaped by structured forgetting and wishful thinking" he told Reuters.
Related special offers:
The exemplary life Robert E. Lee
'America's Christian History: The Untold Story'
And I wonder who those "three historians" might be? Foner, Zinn and Bellesiles?
Which is exactly what it was. I don't know of a serious historian who would argue otherwise.
They fail to mention that after the slaves were freed from the plantations of the Democrat's that they forever voted overwhelmingly, gratefully, and lovingly for the Republicans. (Sarcasm OFF now)
I was wondering when they would address this pressing "Southern Bias" issue.
I know that and CFR have been on the average american's "to do" list for so long.
Hahaha! Fine by me. Pitcaithley and others in the NPS were warned that they were stepping into a "political minefield" but obviously they decided it would be ok to become the willing puppets of Jesse Jackson Jr's race-baiting initiative.
"We want only the most recent history of this country to be relevent to people", he added.
History is being re-written and nobody seems to care.
Our nation is only a couple of rewrites away from having never existed.
Ding ding ding! That's the best response yet. It does feel an awful lot like working in Winston Smith's "Ministry of Information" does it not?
Slavery was going to die. It simply couldn't withstand enlightenment. I would venture to state that it would have probably been eliminated within twenty to thirty years at the outside. The issue of state's rights would have stood. Our nation would be better off today without the divisions and devastation. Our nation would be a more sound nation today ideologically.
In the name of emancipation the nation forbid the south to secede. You watch what happens when California votes to secede to meet the aspirations of Mexican national interests. We'll see how soundly the idea of "holding the nation together" stands the test of time. I submit the federal government will send California on it's way with blessings and the suggestion that neighboring states might want to consider the same path. How then was it reasonable to declare war on the south for following their aspiration, actual bothers and sisters of the nation, not outsiders as in the case of California deciding to secede essentially to satisfy Mexican aspirations.
Oh, it's not that nobody cares. Plenty of people care. But if you actually complain about it, that makes you a racist. You'll lose your job, lose your friends, lose your reputation.
Welcome to Stalinist Amerika. Be quiet, or they'll send you to the gulag.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.