Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/26/2002 4:57:36 AM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Catspaw
Somebody needs to tell the FBI to get off it's butt, and start taking these threats more seriously.......

No wait......somebody did that last week......nevermind. (/sarcasm)

2 posted on 11/26/2002 5:16:54 AM PST by Dallas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Catspaw
Any heads in the US rolling? Any accountability yet?
3 posted on 11/26/2002 5:17:11 AM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Catspaw
Michelle Malkin should be asked (begged) to lead the INS. Period. Problem solved. (and think of how you would look forward to press conferences!!)
4 posted on 11/26/2002 5:42:20 AM PST by SpinyNorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Catspaw
Wow, I'm glad Homeland Security is in place now. That'll help for sure < /sarcasm>
5 posted on 11/26/2002 5:57:18 AM PST by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Catspaw
The federal government's main job function is to protect us. Without this prtection they become completely useless. Everything else can be done on a state level, so if they are not protecting us why are they still in place? They need to get moving with this homeland security before they become extinct.
9 posted on 11/26/2002 6:55:47 AM PST by Mixer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Catspaw
Since the article does not mention nationalities, guess we can assume a good chunk of them were Saudis.
11 posted on 11/26/2002 8:16:21 AM PST by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Catspaw
Could we not have just a one year moratorium on immigration, legal and illegal? Given the National Emergency in which we find ourselves, how cruel would it be to take a year to enforce our borders, retrain/reorient the INS and debate sane immigration quotas and policies? And frankly, at the risk of sounding like a Know Nothing Nativist, I'm not buying the dodge that the Republicans can't afford to get tough on immigration for fear of losing the "Hispanic" vote. They may have already lost the "Chicano" vote in states like Kalifornia, but it's insulting to Latinos across the country to accept as an article of faith that they can't understand the harm that uncontrolled (legal and illegal) immigration can do in the wake of 9/11. The real reason the GOP won't do anything about illegal immigration is American Business' (read: Fortune 500, Chamber of Commerce, Big and Small Business owners) addiction to cheap Mexican and Latin American (illegal immigrant) labor. Lest anyone think I'm leaving the DNC out of the equation, everyone knows that the 'Rats (even their Big Labor pals, who ought to be protecting American jobs) have whole-heartedly embraced illegal immigration.
12 posted on 11/26/2002 8:33:13 AM PST by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Catspaw
I don't know about you people, but this kind of service is what makes me feel good about ditching the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and any other Constitutional amendments that get in the way of safety and national security. /end sarcasm
14 posted on 11/26/2002 12:36:41 PM PST by MichiganConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Catspaw
Sickening.
15 posted on 11/26/2002 4:47:02 PM PST by 4.1O dana super trac pak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Catspaw
I thought the State Department was guarding against this happening.
16 posted on 11/26/2002 6:48:57 PM PST by not-an-ostrich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson