Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A detailed look at what the Smith & Wesson Company agreed to do for the Cinton Administration!
US Department of Housing and Urban Development ^ | FR Post 10-19-2002 | HUD Editorial Staff

Posted on 10/19/2002 6:31:28 PM PDT by vannrox

HUD Homes and Communities Photo





 
 

AGREEMENT BETWEEN SMITH & WESSON AND
THE DEPARTMENTS OF THE TREASURY AND HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND STATES

SUMMARY OF TERMS

Preamble: The city, state, county and federal parties agree to dismiss the parties from the pending suits and refrain from filing suits against the manufacturer parties based on an equivalent cause of action.

SAFETY AND DESIGN

All handguns must meet the following safety and design standards:

All pistols must meet the following additional requirements:

Law enforcement and military exception. If law enforcement agencies or the military certify the need, exceptions to these requirements may be made. Manufacturers will ask that these guns not be resold to the civilian market.

Warnings about safe storage and handling included with all firearms within six months.

Illegal firearms. Manufacturers will not sell firearms that can readily be converted into fully automatic weapons or that are resistant to fingerprints.

 

SALES AND DISTRIBUTION

Code of Conduct. The manufacturers will sell only to authorized dealers and distributors and allow their authorized distributors to sell only to authorized dealers. Authorized dealers and distributors will agree to a code of conduct. If manufacturers receive notice of a violation by an authorized dealer or distributor, they will take action against the dealer or distributor, including termination of sales to the dealer or distributor. The Oversight Commission will review such actions and have authority to require termination or suspension if warranted.

The code of conduct will require authorized dealers and distributors to:

Manufacturer commitments. Manufacturers will:

Corporate responsibility for crime gun traces. If an authorized dealer or distributor has a disproportionate number of crime guns traced to it within three years of sale, the manufacturers will take action, including possible termination or suspension, against the dealer or distributor. The Oversight Commission will review such actions and have authority to require termination or suspension if warranted.

Oversight Commission will be established and empowered to oversee implementation of the Agreement. The Commission will have five members selected as follows: one by manufacturers; two by city and county parties; one by state parties; one by ATF. The Commission’s powers will include the authority to review compliance with the design and safety requirements, review the safety and training program for dealer and distributor employees, review manufacturer actions against dealers or distributors that violate the Agreement or have a disproportionate number of crime gun traces, and require suspension or termination if warranted.

Role of ATF. To the extent consistent with law, ATF will work with manufacturers and the Oversight Commission to assist them in meeting obligations under the Agreement. ATF will notify the Oversight Commission of certain violations of the Agreement by distributors and dealers if it uncovers such violations.

Ballistics Imaging. Within six months, if technologically available, manufacturers will fire all firearms before sale and will enter the digital image of the casings in a system compatible with the National Integrated Ballistics Identification Network and accessible to ATF. This will enable law enforcement to trace crime guns when only the bullets or casings are recovered.

Access 2000. Manufacturers shall participate in ATF’s Access 2000 program, which establishes electronic links with ATF and enables high-speed tracing of crime guns.

Legislation. The parties will work together to support legislative efforts to reduce firearm misuse and the development of authorized user technology.

Education trust fund. Upon resolution of all current city, state, and county lawsuits, manufacturers will dedicate 1% of overall firearms revenues to an education trust fund.

Most favored entity. If other manufacturers enter agreements with more expansive design and distribution reforms, and those manufacturers, along with the manufacturer parties to this Agreement, account for fifty percent or more of United States handgun sales, the manufacturer parties to this Agreement will agree to abide by the same reforms.

Enforcement. The Agreement will be entered into and enforceable as a court order and as a contract.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: 2nd; amendment; banglist; billofrights; brady; clinton; freedom; gore; gun; hillery; law; regulation; rifle; second; sw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
For some reason, I was under the belief and the understanding that S&W was not adbiding by these agreement, but now I can see how cleanly we were sold down the river! I found this information doing research for a S&W model 99 pistol. I thought that it might be a nice gun to have. No LONGER!
1 posted on 10/19/2002 6:31:29 PM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *bang_list
S&W I am ashamed of you. Take that US Flag icon off your web site!
2 posted on 10/19/2002 6:32:33 PM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .30Carbine; Congressman Billybob; Shooter 2.5; struwwelpeter; SteveH
PING!
3 posted on 10/19/2002 6:43:25 PM PDT by petuniasevan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Sickening: Absolutely sickening.

Clearly the Federal Government now views gun ownwership in this country is now de facto a privilege and not a right (the words of the Second Amendment to the contrary notwithstanding).

4 posted on 10/19/2002 6:49:38 PM PDT by BenR2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenR2
In defense of S&W, they were pretty much certain they would be sued a la 'big tobacco' law suits if they did not comply... and knew they couldn't survive a reaming like that.

Remember this was like months after the first big tobacco extortio... I mean law suits were won in state after state.

But they did grab their ankles pretty quick.
5 posted on 10/19/2002 6:56:07 PM PDT by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: petuniasevan
So, in short, when you purchase a Smith and Wesson firearm, you can be assured that your gun and your personal information has...


6 posted on 10/19/2002 6:57:28 PM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Is the boycott still on? I felt bad going for a Sig, as I would have liked to support an American gunmaker, but the deal with x42 was too much. I thought I heard that the new owners were going to repudiate it? I wonder what ever happened with that...
7 posted on 10/19/2002 6:58:42 PM PDT by newwahoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
About two weeks after S&W committed financial suicide by caving to the Nazis there was a big S&W sale at a local gun shop. S&W representatives were there to show off their wares and try to make sales. It was quite possibly the most embarrassing thing I've ever actually seen.

No one in the store would even look at them. "Not interested." "No thanks." "I'll never buy from y'all again." I added my own, "Thanks, but you couldn't give me one, sell them to the federal government," when they tried to woo me.

Just out of curiosity I returned the next day. They were still there, and they had marked their guns down to what couldn't have been very much more than invoice. They had some *very nice* guns there, and there they stayed. I hung out and talked to the clerk for about two hours just to see what happened. Not one person who came in showed the slightest interest in them or their guns, and most were downright hostile/disgusted. Just before I left they gave each other "The Look" and packed up and took off.

The moral to this story is: The good will punish association and accomodation with evil. Reap what you sow.

8 posted on 10/19/2002 7:24:30 PM PDT by Jonathon Spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
This is 2 or 3 years old. What is the point? The owners of the company who made that agreement are gone. The new owners and the present administration have ended the agreement. I thought this forum was for current news, now ancient history.
9 posted on 10/19/2002 7:55:16 PM PDT by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jim_trent
"...The owners of the company who made that agreement are gone..."

So what. According to USC COntract Law. The contract is still inforce. And it is being enforced.


"...The new owners and the present administration have ended the agreement..."

I hope you are correct. COuld you please kindly give me a URL to verify this. That is why I was looking in the first place. I wanted a S&W 99, but I was unable to determine whether the agreement was revoked. Unless it has been revoked, or the company has completely reorganized under chapter 11 the odds are very likely that the agreement is still in force.

I would really like the link. Other than that, I am afraid that you are basing your thoughts and comments on "hearsay" and nothing legally binding.

Like I said. As far as I know, the agreement is still in place.
10 posted on 10/19/2002 8:05:16 PM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Read the story in the Wall Street Journal last week. The agreement you posted is ancient history. The company has since been sold. Its new management is all American, and they have repudiated this agreement. They have rejoined the fold, insofar as defense of Second Amendment rights is concerned. No boycott is in effect nor is any justified.
11 posted on 10/19/2002 8:13:26 PM PDT by blau993
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
I believe that I also read a similar story on this subject in a recent NRA American Rifleman issue, that stated that S&W had backed out of this "Alleged" agreement from the
Clinton era. I'll try to confirm that with a google search.

12 posted on 10/19/2002 8:22:35 PM PDT by mark the shark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mark the shark
Thanx. I like the SW 99. It's a sweet pistol. But I won't touch it with a mile long wire if the agreement is in any was still un-resended. Otherwise, as soon as a new administration comes to town, the agreement could suddenly be reactivated.
13 posted on 10/19/2002 8:29:26 PM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
I believe that I also read a similar story on this subject in a recent NRA American Rifleman issue, that stated that S&W had backed out of this "Alleged" agreement from the
Clinton era. I'll try to confirm that with a google search.

14 posted on 10/19/2002 8:47:11 PM PDT by mark the shark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
OOPS on the double post. So far all I could find on the S&W web site was reference to the agreement they had with the city of Boston, which was apparently base on a similar foundation when compared with the Fed agreement, but I could find no solid reference to the fed agreement and it's status. I'm still looking though, I'm going to look for my old American Rifleman mags. Try to let you know what I find.
15 posted on 10/19/2002 8:51:58 PM PDT by mark the shark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Consider also HK USP Compact in .40...
16 posted on 10/19/2002 9:44:24 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Get the Walther version. Mine is .40 cal and it's sweet!
17 posted on 10/19/2002 10:57:44 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mark the shark
I doubt that you'll find much further information. S&W informally decided to stop honoring the terms of the agreement, and the current administration informally decided not to hold them to it. The agreement still exists, and could still be enforced by a less gun-friendly administration.
18 posted on 10/19/2002 11:05:01 PM PDT by Skibane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus; vannrox; SteveH
Y'all quit playin' with them there toys and buy yerselves a Kahr,
y'hear?
19 posted on 10/19/2002 11:18:15 PM PDT by fire_eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
I recommend Kimber- they make top-notch weapons, for a (relatively) reasonable price... I tried Sig, S&W and Glock... They were OK, but when I fired a Kimber...?

WOW!

Sweet craftmanship, flawless operation. And a trigger that's as smooth as silk...

Why would I buy a cheap piece of cr@p like S&W, compared to a Kimber???

Be good,

20 posted on 10/19/2002 11:19:00 PM PDT by Capitalist Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson