Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Ships Tanks to Gulf, Bush to Make Case on Iraq
Reuters | 9/04/02 | Stefano Ambrogi

Posted on 09/04/2002 4:57:06 AM PDT by kattracks

LONDON (Reuters) - The United States will ship tanks and heavy armor to the Middle East this month as President Bush tries to garner domestic support for efforts to oust Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.

Shipping sources said Wednesday the U.S. Navy had booked a large commercial ship to carry tanks and heavy armor to the Gulf, a sign its own vessels might have made such shipments.

The U.S. Military Sealift Command chartered a U.S.-flagged general cargo ship to sail from the southeast U.S. coast to an unspecified Gulf port for discharge in late September, they said.

This is the third shipment of arms and military hardware in a month using commercial shipping, which military analysts say shows the U.S. Navy has probably exhausted the capacity of its own fleet and resorted to the open market.

Military analysts say the movement of heavy armor to the Gulf mirrors similar movements ahead of the 1991 Gulf War and shows the superpower is building up fire power in the region ahead of a military strike.

In line with a pledge to consult on any move against Iraq, Bush will meet top members of Congress from both parties at the White House to discuss U.S. efforts to overthrow Saddam.

At the meeting scheduled to start at 1345 GMT, Bush could face tough questions from a Congress skeptical of using the military to achieve a "regime change" in Baghdad.

The White House, which accuses Iraq of developing weapons of mass destruction, says Bush has made no decision on how to proceed against the Iraqi leader.

Bush's closest ally, British Prime Minister Tony Blair, has begun preparing the nation for war, telling Britons in his most uncompromising speech on Iraq to date Tuesday the world should face up to the dangers posed by Saddam.

SADDAM PROMISES IRAQIS VICTORY

Saddam, meanwhile, said Tuesday the Iraqis would emerge victorious from any showdown with their enemies.

"We have prevailed before and we will also prevail in Umm al-Ma'arik (the Mother of All Battles) in the end, God willing," Iraq's state television quoted Saddam as saying in an open letter to the Iraqi people.

In Johannesburg, Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said the European Union and the United States agreed to push for weapons inspectors to return to Iraq but the Union felt it premature to say what would happen if Baghdad refused.

Rasmussen, whose country holds the rotating EU presidency, said after meeting Secretary of State Colin Powell at the Earth Summit the bloc wanted a United Nations blessing for any action against Iraq.

"There is agreement between the EU and the United States that here and now we should concentrate our efforts on ensuring that international weapons inspectors can get free and unrestricted access to Iraq," Rasmussen told a news conference.

"Nevertheless, I think it is of vital importance to pursue the U.N. track."

Powell said Tuesday he was exploring proposals that would restore inspections, which ended in 1998. In contrast, Vice President Dick Cheney said last week the inspectors could "provide no assurance whatsoever" and could even add to the danger by giving a false sense of comfort.

NO PROGRESS ON INSPECTIONS

The United Nations said Iraq had moved no closer to accepting weapons inspectors despite fresh overtures by a top Iraqi official, albeit with conditions attached.

Iraq's Deputy Prime Minister Tareq Aziz said Baghdad would discuss the return of the inspectors in conjunction with other issues, a stance rejected by Secretary-General Kofi Annan and members of the 15-nation U.N. Security Council in the past.

"At this stage I cannot say they've taken a decision to allow the inspectors. I mean they have questions," Annan told CNN after he spoke to Aziz at the Earth Summit. His spokesman, Fred Eckhard, repeated the comments in New York.

The inspectors searching for weapons of mass destruction were pulled out of Iraq in December 1998, on the eve of a U.S.-British bombing raid. They have not been allowed to return.

Aziz said a comprehensive solution would involve tackling U.S. threats to oust Iraq's leadership, American and British air patrols over the north and south of Iraq and the lifting of sanctions imposed for Baghdad's 1990 invasion of Kuwait.

U.S. allies, Muslim countries and many other nations are wary of any unilateral action, demanding a role for the United Nations in clarifying Iraq's capabilities and intent, and in authorizing any attack should that effort fail.

Arab foreign ministers began a two-day meeting in Cairo expected to focus on U.S. threats against Iraq. Arab countries have unanimously opposed any military action against Baghdad.

In Australia, Prime Minister John Howard sought to calm protests over possible Australian involvement in any military action against Iraq, saying Canberra would only send troops if it was "in the national interest."



TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911andislamakazis; 911massmurder; evilopeckerprinces; exportingterrorism; fatah; fatahiscrap; fundingalqaeda; gazafirstdisaster; hamas; hamasiscrap; hebrewuniversity; islamakazis; islamakaziwahhabi; israel; jihadinamerica; jihadiscrap; kicksaddamsass; killallislamakazis; laairportterror; liberalpolicitians; lobby; medievalmonarchy; middleeast; money; muslimworldleague; neverforget911; offensive; opecequalterrorism; opeckerislamakazis; opeckerprinces; opecoilterrorism; opecterrorexport; osamabindead; osamabinladen; oslodelusionkills; palestinian; palestinians; philippines; radicalislam; radicalislamakazis; saddamistoast; samialarian; saudi; saudiarabia; saudideathcults; saudienemies; saudiislamakazis; saudisequalnazis; saudispayhamas; saudispushterror; september11; stabintheback; sueopeckerprinces; terror; terrorism; terrorist; usf; wahhabi; wahhabideathcult; wahhabiislamakazis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: Yehuda
>>>Possibly if you didn't get into arguments on every thread you could keep track of who you've p*ssed off.

I'd say you're the one whose getting pissed off here, not me.

You overreacted and jumped to a few conclusions that were essentially wrong. The inferences you made, gave this conservative observer the impression, you favored the viewpoint of FReeper "chance33_98". Remember that guy. He was one I made the original comments to. My remarks to him/her, were specifically about using nukes. My overall comments were very clear and straight forward.

I believe, you weren't asking me a litany of questions to better understand my position on this issue. Rather, I believe you offered up your questions, so you could you get irrate, belligerent and have a drag out argument with me. I didn't fall for your nonsense, but you've pressed this issue anyway. So be it. Btw, if you went back to the link you posted of my past remarks, you would see another post of mine on that thread, that was also questioning the sanity of using nukes, as a first strike option, against anyone! I'm very consistent with my statements and positions on the issues.

>>>"... I suggest you knock off the insults."

>>>Or what? Going to teach me a verbal lesson?

Look bucko, you can think and feel anyway you want to, I could care less. I gave you my analysis of your remarks. If you're now informing me, I may have read you wrong, okay fine. But the childish namecalling should be reserved for the "Smokey Backroom" forum.

As for denouncing my choice of a screen name and my profile page, well, if thats all you have, I'd say, you can stuff your immature rants and get a real life.

Well you won this one, didn't ya?

Well, I didn't lose.

61 posted on 09/05/2002 7:02:18 AM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Just exactly what is a 'war world'?
Maybe you should do some thinking
and stop criticizing those of us who
have the right to push for turning
Baghdad to fused silica!

Mad Vlad

62 posted on 09/05/2002 9:13:13 AM PDT by madvlad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda
As usual when you try and pick on someone that's smarter than you are. You fall hard on your face.
63 posted on 09/05/2002 2:25:37 PM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

Comment #64 Removed by Moderator

To: chance33_98
I was joking about nuking them - but only because it would contaminate the oil.

Wait a minute. Contaminated oil would be great for checking oil in your engine at night. The oil would glow on the dip-stick and you wouldn't need a flashlight to see your oil level. Cool ;-)

65 posted on 09/05/2002 2:58:32 PM PDT by varon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson