Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The War on the West has moved East, South, North...
Sheila Davis ^ | August 14, 2002 | Sheila Davis

Posted on 08/14/2002 12:25:44 PM PDT by countrydummy

Letter to the Editor

The environmental war on the west that destroyed whole communities is here in the east , southeast , far south, as well as the north. That means basically that the environmental war is everywhere now in these great United States!

What is this war? It is a well orchestrated environmental movement using federal regulations that is destroying the livelihoods of rural Americans all across the country. The main weapons of this war is such wonderful propaganda and rhetorical terminology such as “preservation and conservation”

From these two words alone come some of the most horrific instances of governmental abuse of private property rights ever in our history! Using “preservation”, this movement has been and continues to destroy and deprive families and communities of their livelihoods, heritages, and of course any dreams for the future and the future financial independence of rural Americans.“

As with “preservation” “conservation” is just as destructive when folks all over the country continue to send their hard earned dollars to such politically powerful and “correct” organizations such as The Sierra Club, The Nature Conservancy and The Audubon Society believing that these non-governmental organizations are just a group of benign benevolent folks trying to save the Earth! Why? Because these groups use their influence with Congress to pass further land-use restrictions, commonly referred to as Land Use Management Plans. These plans have all sorts of terminology designed only to strip private land owners of either their lands completely or the value that their lands have.

For example, homes and business are being taken using eminent domain to “protect and conserve “viewsheds, soundsheds and a new one, night skysheds! These “sheds” are one of the favorite abuses of the National Park Service. Other examples of these weapons include the Endangered Species Act which can/does and has taken thousands to millions of acres (and communities) off local tax bases to “protect” these species. The Clean Water Act, with resulting TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Loads) in WV alone will basically strip Tucker County ( and this is just the beginning) of all private land ownership, thus destroying the economy of the county. Now our forests in WV and VA have been added to a list of “endangered forests”....this will bring about “NO-USE” of these lands by humans!

These instances are occurring all over WV, as well in all of our bordering states , being done a little at a time so as not to bring to much public awareness to each situation in fear that some of us will finally start adding 2 + 2 and seeing the whole picture for what it really is! The destruction of private property ownership and the associated rights it conveys.

Viewsheds will take out all the landowners along the New River near Hinton, WV. Simply put as Lori Sprague of the National Park Service told Fox News in an interview, “If in fact, this is going to be a scenic parkway, then we feel the scenic qualities should be protected.“ “Wherever you happen to be at that point in time, and what you see from there is your viewshed.”

Maine, New York State, Tennessee, and so on and so on are facing these same issues with unique “coastal regulations” these are basically all the same........Land Use Management Plans! Now folks in southwest Florida are under direct attack! Their homes will all be flooded to supposedly restore the Everglades......the Everglades natural flora and fauna can’t take the amount of this kind of increased water! It never had it! But the landowners will all be gone!

How then is this a war? Is not the destruction of the Constitutional right to private land ownership and the pursuit of happiness it allows for with the ever increasing destruction of these inalienable rights not an attack, one that would and does constituent a war? Ask all the families out west that have already lost their homes, heritages, towns, livelihoods? Many of them fought and lost because the same tactics are being used here in the east, north, and the south.....a little at a time. This does not mention the falsification of records to obtain their lands illegally. That is another story!

Sheila Davis Sisters of the River Hinton, WV 25969 Http://www.newriverfriends.org email: country357@stargate.net Phone: (304) 466-3676


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Announcements; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Free Republic; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: Colorado; US: Florida; US: Maine; US: New York; US: Tennessee; US: West Virginia
KEYWORDS: constitution; eminentdomain; enviralists; landgrab; landgrabs; nps; viciousness
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
I hope this will help you to all understand the out of control that ngo's and the feds have!
1 posted on 08/14/2002 12:25:44 PM PDT by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: madfly; farmfriend; sauropod; Black Agnes; Grampa Dave
bump
2 posted on 08/14/2002 12:27:27 PM PDT by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: countrydummy
Thanks!!!
3 posted on 08/14/2002 12:27:39 PM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cacique; firebrand; rmlew; StarFan; Dutchy; Coleus
ping !
4 posted on 08/14/2002 12:29:56 PM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
I also hope this is generalized enough to change the name of the states to yours and those around you......
5 posted on 08/14/2002 12:32:25 PM PDT by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: *Enviralists; *landgrab
Index Bump
6 posted on 08/14/2002 12:34:36 PM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: countrydummy
Yeah, they're like a pestilence. They're everywhere...just remember, the wildlands USA map has 50% of the US designated as PEOPLE FREE. 50% is a BIG AREA. It was only a matter of time before they got east of the MS.
7 posted on 08/14/2002 12:41:19 PM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
exactly! On both points! That is the reason for the letter! Folks way out West still think we here on the eastern coast are not getting it! :-) Oh yes we are!!!!!!!!! Jus task New York, Maine, Vermont, Virginia, WV, Ohio, South Carolina, North Carolina, etc....... :-)
8 posted on 08/14/2002 12:44:27 PM PDT by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST; nunya bidness; summer
ping!
9 posted on 08/14/2002 12:53:25 PM PDT by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: countrydummy; George Frm Br00klyn Park; Coyote; cogitator; Movemout; redrock; Grampa Dave; AuntB; ..
Ze Ping!
10 posted on 08/14/2002 1:12:28 PM PDT by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
I think summer is about to "dry up"! hahahahaha What did you think of my editoral attempt!
11 posted on 08/14/2002 1:17:08 PM PDT by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
50% is a BIG AREA

50% huh. In Collier County Florida, the local, state and federal government owns 87% of all land.

Now they're trying to buy even more with the 8 bil they got their hands on, in addition to all the land they have marked for flooding, conservation easements etc. etc.

12 posted on 08/14/2002 1:23:36 PM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ssplam
ping
13 posted on 08/14/2002 1:33:24 PM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
Oh yes, many rural county (ies) are really either state or federally owned over the 50% mark......the rest is to come using the WildLands Project! And the state of Florida is in big trouble, as is the state of WV.....we are to be the "elistist playground"....no room for us commoners, except to be the handmaidens and grooms of the elite! See WV is only a few hours drive from the Capital.....all our mining, timbering, poultry, dairy, hog farms, etc., is to be severely restricted, along with the viewsheds along our rivers.....and then of course the tmdl rules will stop the logging and mining.......Hello, WV is mining!

No we are to be turned into buffers and corridors just like you, except worse.....we are all mountains, views and streams!

14 posted on 08/14/2002 1:58:50 PM PDT by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: summer; sauropod
summer please read your private email and pd, she needs not attacked, but she needs education on the issues without emotions!
15 posted on 08/14/2002 3:10:00 PM PDT by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
Thanks, this is a good one to save. Those Democraps are ruining our country. I wish they would all leave us alone
16 posted on 08/14/2002 6:50:28 PM PDT by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: countrydummy
Well, on the Georgia Coast, people don't have much to worry about, as the Federal Government already owns about 80% of our coastline. Furthermore, our coastline is sparsely populated with a few population centers around Savannah and Brunswick, with a few smaller towns around St. Mary's and Darien. The only commercial beaches we have are Tybee, Jekyl and St. Simon's Island. I'll admit, though, we have a beautiful natural coastline.

The bulk of the state's population is up in the northern half of the state around Atlanta.

17 posted on 08/14/2002 7:52:04 PM PDT by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: countrydummy
Who's attacking?
18 posted on 08/15/2002 5:59:58 AM PDT by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: countrydummy
Keep your eyes and ears on the state of Montana. There will be a bill introduced in the next legislative session that begins to regulate "Conservation Easements" by requiring a sunset clause of 10 years on existing CE's and approval of any new CE's by local county commissioners with the right of the public to file an APPEAL to stop any CE. There will be no right to file an appeal to have the CE put in place.

As well, because states control the manner in which title is transfered, the proposal, entitled "The Montana Resource USE Protection Act", requires that no title be transferred to the feds without the feds selling at fair market value within 1 year to the highest bidder at least 1.5 acres of like kind exisiting federal land for each acre of land the feds wish to purchase or ENCUMBER in any manner in the state.

In short, it will be the long term policy of the state of Montana, (and with the success of this legislation, hopefully other states will follow), to begin the process of reducing the acreage of federally held lands, incrementally, and under statutory mandates state departments and agencies must follow.

Keep your eye on this. Montana is one state that doesn't buy into the crapola the environmentalist donations industry tries to spew, and we love our hunting, fishing, and resource based economy and lands more than any armchair enviromentalist in San Francisco. Note the title of the bill- "The Montana Resource USE protection Act." - point being that today's Enviro whacks have no right to preclude future generations of Montanans from being able to use the resources that they will no doubt need for their existence. The environmentalist just don't know how to plan for the long term of humanity.

It's been said before, but I'll say it again: 120 years ago people didn't know enough or believe "the environment" existed. Today, the environmental donations industry makes believe people don't exist or need resources. Both those beliefs eventually hit a brick wall of reality, and today, the brick wall of reality for the pie-in-the-sky enviro whack cases is forest fires, economic devastation, loss of local communities and heritage, and indeed because of the enviro whacks, species have actually gone DOWN in population where specific efforts to increase their numbers have been attempted. Remarkably, the only place species have INCREASED is populated rural areas- meaning that not only is there little or no science put into the equation, but were finding out that if all you do is import more grizzly bears into an area because you think there are not enough- what they do is start living in and around towns and people- meaning first that grizzlies don't give a dam if there's a road or people or logging or mining, hell they'll take off your back door and tear apart your refigerator if they want to- just for fun to get a slice of bread after wobbling around the forest like a bowl full of jelly on a full belly of berries.

Anyway, watch Montana- this is going to be very interesting...

19 posted on 08/15/2002 6:02:11 AM PDT by GotDangGenius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: countrydummy
There is a "lessor" CP program - preferred in our county. It is called the Conservation Reserve Program. So far, I believe, it is only offered for grazing land. It is a long term (10-20 year) renewable federal rental agreement of riparian land. There is no permanent title change.

Because of sub-irrigation, riparian lands are some of the most productive for forage. When the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act take away the viable use of a farmers riparian lands, he can incurr a substantial loss - particularly in narrow mountainous areas where ranches follow river lines. The CRP pays the farmer for managing that land in a certain way - fencing out cattle and encouraging woody vegetation. Otherwise, the rancher would just essentially lose the use of the land for ranching.

The draw backs are that cattle cannot be used periodically as a tool to eliminate noxious weeds. Also, once the woody vegetation becomes established, the land may no longer be suitable for grazing and the owner could be prevented in the future through forestry and environmental rules from clearing shrubs and larger trees that may have grown during the rental period.

There has to be a solution. Morally, the public shouldn't just "take" the viable economic use of the land without some sort of renumeration.
20 posted on 08/15/2002 9:51:54 AM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson