Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"It may be that U.S. Federal military forces cannot be effectively used for missions supporting law enforcement much beyond a service-support role, and that the better solution is to well-equip the National Guard physically and legally to handle these situations. As for Federal troops, the distraction of special training, the legal strictures that apply to Federal military forces, and the need to focus limited resources on their warfighting mission, suggest that the Regulars are not the best troops for the job."

Congress better get with the program before it does something stupid.

1 posted on 07/21/2002 1:42:50 PM PDT by habaes corpussel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: habaes corpussel
bttt
2 posted on 07/21/2002 1:50:36 PM PDT by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: habaes corpussel
The riots in L.A. got bad because the city fathers did not have the balls to stop it when it started. They believed that it was a good way to let citizens let off some steam.
3 posted on 07/21/2002 1:54:15 PM PDT by Brush_Your_Teeth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: habaes corpussel
the Posse comitatus Act does not necessarily apply in cases of "a sudden and unexpected civil disturbance, disaster, or calamity . . .

This is interesting. Who decides when the situation meets this definition? President, governor? Seems to me that under certain situations, this could be applied pretty broadly. In that case, so long Posse Comitatus Act.

4 posted on 07/21/2002 1:56:22 PM PDT by serinde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: madfly
.
9 posted on 07/21/2002 2:17:41 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: habaes corpussel
Congress better get with the program before it does something stupid.

Oh..but you repeat yourself. ;)

10 posted on 07/21/2002 2:21:33 PM PDT by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: habaes corpussel
As for Federal troops, the distraction of special training, the legal strictures that apply to Federal military forces, and the need to focus limited resources on their warfighting mission, suggest that the Regulars are not the best troops for the job."

Agreed, then why are they being used in similar roles overseas aka The Balkans (rhetorical question)? They should never have been and shouldn't be now. Standing armies are defined and designed to fight and win wars, not attempt to play cop.

18 posted on 07/21/2002 5:24:47 PM PDT by TADSLOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: habaes corpussel
Haven't read it yet, but these Civil War sections of the US Code give the President all the unconstitutional powers he needs to do anything he wants on US soil:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/10/331.html
Sec. 331. - Federal aid for State governments

Whenever there is an insurrections in any State against its government, the President may, upon the request of its legislature or of its governor if the legislature cannot be convened, call into Federal service such of the militia of the other States, in the number requested by that State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to suppress the insurrection

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/10/332.html
Sec. 332. - Use of militia and armed forces to enforce Federal authority

Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State or Territory by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/10/333.html
Sec. 333. - Interference with State and Federal law

The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it -
(1)
so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or
(2)
opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the

United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.

In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution
28 posted on 07/22/2002 8:06:07 AM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: habaes corpussel
Congress better get with the program before it does something stupid.

Now THAT is funny, I nominate you for Quote of the day !!

30 posted on 07/22/2002 8:20:48 AM PDT by unixfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson