Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

100,000-Year Climate Pattern Linked To Sun's Magnetic Cycle
Science Daily ^ | 6-7-2002

Posted on 06/08/2002 6:12:46 PM PDT by blam

Date: Posted 6/7/2002

100,000-Year Climate Pattern Linked To Sun's Magnetic Cycles

HANOVER, N.H. – Thanks to new calculations by a Dartmouth geochemist, scientists are now looking at the earth's climate history in a new light. Mukul Sharma, Assistant Professor of Earth Sciences at Dartmouth, examined existing sets of geophysical data and noticed something remarkable: the sun's magnetic activity is varying in 100,000-year cycles, a much longer time span than previously thought, and this solar activity, in turn, may likely cause the 100,000-year climate cycles on earth. This research helps scientists understand past climate trends and prepare for future ones. Published in the June 10 issue of Earth and Planetary Science Letters (Elsevier, volume 199, issues 3-4), Sharma's study combined data on the varying production rates of beryllium 10, an isotope found on earth produced when high-energy galactic cosmic rays bombard our atmosphere, and data on the past variations in the earth's magnetic field intensity. With this information, Sharma calculated variations in solar magnetic activity going back 200,000 years, and he noticed a pattern.

Over the last 1 million years, the earth's climate record has revealed a 100,000-year cycle oscillating between relatively cold and warm conditions, and Sharma's data on the sun's magnetic activity corresponded to the earth's ice age history.

"Surprisingly, it looks like solar activity is varying in longer time spans than we realized," says Sharma. "We knew about the shorter cycles of solar activity, so maybe these are just little cycles within a larger cycle. Even more surprising is the fact that the glacial and interglacial periods on earth during the last 200,000 years appear to be strongly linked to solar activity."

Sharma's calculations suggest that when the sun is magnetically more active, the earth experiences a warmer climate, and vice versa, when the sun is magnetically less active, there is a glacial period. Right now, the earth is in an interglacial period (in between ice ages) that began about 11,000 years ago, and as expected, this is also a time when the estimated solar activity appears to be high.

Beryllium 10 is useful for studying the geology from hundreds of thousands of years ago mainly because it has a half-life of about one and a half million years. In addition, there are two key factors that have affected beryllium 10 production over the last 200,000 years: the earth's magnetic field and the sun's magnetic activity. When there are high-intensity solar magnetic storms, more charged particles are interacting with cosmic rays, and less beryllium 10 is produced. Likewise, the earth's magnetic field changes the flux of cosmic rays into and out of the atmosphere.

Since the production rate of beryllium 10 and earth's magnetic field intensity are known for the last 200,000 years, Sharma could calculate solar magnetic activity for this time period.

"I took sets of existing, independent data and made new comparisons and calculations," says Sharma. Then he went a step further to make a connection with the history of ice ages by looking at oxygen isotopes in the oceans, which reveal the history of how much ice was at the poles and are therefore a measure of average global surface temperature.

"I compared the estimated past variations in the solar activity with those of the oxygen isotopes in the ocean. Although there is a strong relationship between solar activity and oxygen isotopic variations, it is too early to say exactly what is the mechanism though which the sun is influencing the terrestrial climate."

One explanation of the 100,000-year cycle was offered by the Milankovitch Theory of Ice Ages in the 1940s, which suggested that the cyclical variations in the earth's orbit around the sun result in the earth receiving varying amounts of solar radiation that, in turn, control the climate. This explanation is under dispute because the variations of the solar energy in relation to the changes in orbit are very small. Other current research focuses on past variations in the sun's irradiance, or heat intensity (as opposed to the magnetic activity).

Sharma notes that more analysis is needed to test his theory. "I've only looked at 200,000 years. My calculations need to be verified for a million years, for instance. Plus, regarding the current global warming debate, it still needs to be examined if the role of solar activity will exacerbate the rising temperatures that result from carbon dioxide buildup in the atmosphere."

This work was supported by Dartmouth College, the Max Planck Institute and by a grant from the National Science Foundation.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 000; 100; climate; globalwarminghoax; magnetic; pattern; solarcycle; suns; year
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Global Warming? (I have been fortunate enough to live at one of the best times in human history)
1 posted on 06/08/2002 6:12:46 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: callisto;RightWhale
FYI.
2 posted on 06/08/2002 6:13:44 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Only 71 degrees here today in California. So dang comfortable, its hard to stay awake.

Hey and don't forget the solar eclipse, June 10, 02. It will be approximately 80 percent of totality in California.

In my opinion Global warming to is junk science with a global agenda. It's globalony.

3 posted on 06/08/2002 6:17:26 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Global Warming? (I have been fortunate enough to live at one of the best times in human history)

LOL! I was born in Miami, Fla in 1943, grew up down there, now I live up here in the frozen north, why? don't ask, anyway, don't talk to me about global warming, I would now welcome some warming, but it's all a bunch of crap. The world is influnenced by the the sun, and the moon. The sun controls the earth's temp, the moon the earth's tides. That's it. The sun has great influence on the temp of the oceans which in turn controls our weather. Do you remember in school being asked how much of the earth's surface is made up of water? Do your remember the answer? Does 3/4 ring a bell? Now, if 3/4 of the earth is made up by water how in the hell can man influence that? It would take some doing. Maybe in the year 4002 we can talk about it. Ah, what crap. It's all politics and I hate it!!

4 posted on 06/08/2002 6:26:55 PM PDT by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Here's a link to the Abstract.
5 posted on 06/08/2002 6:33:29 PM PDT by callisto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
Wow, global warming caused by the Sun? Who'd a thunk it?
6 posted on 06/08/2002 6:36:45 PM PDT by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
What the heck! Since Pakistan and India are going to start a nuclear winter anyway, we might as well pack on as many greenhouse gases as possible! LOL! This guy says the sun it responsible for the really big swings in temps, and still has to get in a shot about it "exacerbating" global warming. Just shows you the inherent bias in scientists (first hand experience with them).
7 posted on 06/08/2002 6:37:08 PM PDT by SpinyNorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
The sunspot cycle has been clearly linked to Earth's climate.
The Maunder Minimum (late 1600's to early 1700's when sunspots almost disappeared) brought a "Little Ice Age" to Earth. The Thames River froze solid in London...
These cycles are not well understood.

From above article.
Sharma: "We knew about the shorter cycles of solar activity, so maybe these are just little cycles within a larger cycle. Even more surprising is the fact that the glacial and interglacial periods on earth during the last 200,000 years appear to be strongly linked to solar activity."

One thing is certain: Severe, global ice age would be more devastating to humans than global warming.

8 posted on 06/08/2002 6:44:18 PM PDT by edwin hubble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: edwin hubble;blam; ;Global Warming Hoax; Stand Watch Listen;rightwhale;Free the USA;carry_okie...
Global Warming Hoax :

To find all articles tagged or indexed using Global Warming Hoax , click below:
  click here >>> Global Warming Hoax <<< click here  
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)



9 posted on 06/08/2002 6:50:34 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blam
Cycle theory is fascinating.
10 posted on 06/08/2002 6:57:32 PM PDT by LostTribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thud
ping
11 posted on 06/08/2002 7:02:20 PM PDT by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Please don't tell me global warming is a hoax. I've been counting on it to moderate or delay the next ice age. We are now in year 11000 of the warm spell. These warm spells last 10000 years on average.
12 posted on 06/08/2002 7:35:10 PM PDT by conejo99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SpinyNorman
Sharma notes that more analysis is needed to test his theory. "I've only looked at 200,000 years. My calculations need to be verified for a million years, for instance. Plus, regarding the current global warming debate, it still needs to be examined if the role of solar activity will exacerbate the rising temperatures that result from carbon dioxide buildup in the atmosphere."

This is typical of the scientists (fear of commitment), and makes me laugh. As my boss likes to say, sometimes one has to "Shoot them, and just build the darn thing."

13 posted on 06/08/2002 7:46:56 PM PDT by patton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam
Recently, on the train, I sat at dinner with a retired meteorologist. He pretty much made clear to me that Sun activity probably has more to do with our climate cycles than man, whom he thought has little effect.

He also let me know that the computer models used for these projections aren't too good.

14 posted on 06/08/2002 7:55:00 PM PDT by Sam Cree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edwin hubble
. . . glacial and interglacial periods on earth during the last 200,000 years appear to be strongly linked to solar activity."

Are we sure that the sun is not heating up because of the greenhouse gasses on earth, caused by man's evolution over this same period?

15 posted on 06/08/2002 7:55:22 PM PDT by NJJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NJJ
Homo sapiens Sapiens (modern man) has only been on the planet for about 40,000 years.
16 posted on 06/08/2002 9:20:03 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: blam
I like to remind that liberals at work that its a good thing that early humans drove SUVs.

Otherwise the last ice age would never have ended.

17 posted on 06/08/2002 9:22:29 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
>its a good thing that early humans drove SUVs. Otherwise the last ice age would never have ended.

Makes sense to me.

18 posted on 06/08/2002 9:30:47 PM PDT by LostTribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: blam
"Even more surprising is the fact that the glacial and interglacial periods on earth during the last 200,000 years appear to be strongly linked to solar activity."

lol. Did the guy just figure out that the sun heats our planet?

19 posted on 06/08/2002 9:36:14 PM PDT by Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
What is the average solar power density on the planet? I think it's on the order of a KW/m2. So it wouldn't take much from the sun to make a big change in surface temperaure. Meanwhile, consider the amount of human-generated power it would take to change that same amount. It's a simple thought experiment, but shows how stupid this all was.
20 posted on 06/08/2002 10:35:54 PM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson