Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Tuesday, May 14, 2002

Quote of the Day by sinkspur 5/14/03

1 posted on 05/13/2002 10:51:49 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: *Miltech;*SuperWeapons

2 posted on 05/13/2002 11:00:10 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2, bang_list
My little bro is hankering for a 50BMG or a Laupua .338. While researching those I came across the Metal Storm systems....I told him he ought to wait for one of those..LOL

Here is the link to their site. Interesting mpegs. Absolutely incredible weapons system. Scary....makes Puffs and AC-130s look tame...if that's possible.

3 posted on 05/13/2002 11:01:03 PM PDT by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
"Under development are systems that include an unmanned aerial combat vehicle that will carry twelve 40 mm mortar boxes comprising a total of 1,200 tubes, and armed with 7,200 grenades. The system's unprecedented firing capabilities can lay down a continuous 50-yard-wide carpet of grenades for two miles, firing all its grenades simultaneously with 5-yard separation on impact. Another gun under development for a small combat aerial vehicle is multibarreled and can fire 270 rounds onto a target in 0.001 seconds without stress on the airframe or any drop in air speed.



Screw the Crusader.

4 posted on 05/13/2002 11:16:23 PM PDT by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Hmmm, what about the Crusader's tactical nuke capabilities? I don't think metal storm can do that.
5 posted on 05/14/2002 2:15:30 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
My son is in the Army Reserves NOW.

I believe he would MUCH prefer to be supported by EXTANT Crusader pieces, rather than 'drawing board' high-tech weapons.

We need to keep the Crusader AND to develop new high-tech weapons.

As Chris Ruddy or NewsMax opined recently, we would need to up the annual DoD budget to more than $600 Billion to truly restore our military.

I think Bush lacks Reagan's laser-vision focus on the threats that this country faces. Case in point: Today's announcement that he is going to sign away two-thirds of this country's nuclear arsenal in a worthless treaty with the always-trustworthy Russians.

8 posted on 05/14/2002 9:45:36 PM PDT by BenR2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson