Skip to comments.
Judge halts bomb training on remote Pacific island
AP via Navy Times ^
| May 02, 2002
| Jaymes Song
Posted on 05/02/2002 6:25:47 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Edited on 05/07/2004 10:11:47 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
HONOLULU
(Excerpt) Read more at navytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: demedinilla; environmentalists; farallon; judge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Here's another good example of how little the enviro-socialists care about their country.
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
If the military have been using this as a bombing range for over 30 years and the birds still exist, how is this harming the birds?
To: DugwayDuke
You were expecting rationality, perhaps?
3
posted on
05/02/2002 6:37:38 PM PDT
by
Cicero
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
The uninhabited island measuring 0.3 miles wide and 1.7 miles long was the only site
in the Western Pacific authorized for live-fire exercises.
In-freakin-credible -- that after winning WWII this is the sum total of turf
the defenders of our freedom are allowed to use to hone their skills.
4
posted on
05/02/2002 6:38:32 PM PDT
by
VOA
To: Cicero;DugwayDuke
Yep, there's those pesky facts again. Geez, Dugway, the tree-huggers hate it when you use logic.
To: DugwayDuke
If the military have been using this as a bombing range for over 30 years and the
birds still exist, how is this harming the birds?
You just know that there is a study by some enviro-freak graduate student from either
the Univ. of California system or an Ivy League school showing that the number of birds
has probably increased because the shelling has sculpted out prime nesting sites
(and the Navy probably just, by accident, doesn't shell during nesting season).
6
posted on
05/02/2002 6:41:31 PM PDT
by
VOA
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
I suggest that the use of technically guided ordinance be used on the home of the atty, judge and the homes of the group that brought the suit in lieu of the tiny island.
7
posted on
05/02/2002 6:45:41 PM PDT
by
stumpy
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Earthjustice Legal Defense for the Center for Biological DiversityMigratory bird act threatened? Humanity's threatened. Can't "we the people" do something about these groups without going through the courts? Couldn't Congress step in..."When the civilized world's threatened, we'll suspend the enviral laws until all militant Muslim terrorist cells and are eliminated" Bill.
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
brown and red-footed boobies These birds are not "endangered". The whole DemocRAT caucus in the Congress is full of them.
9
posted on
05/02/2002 6:55:35 PM PDT
by
jackbill
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Evidently one does not have to be familiar with logic to be either an environmentalist or a judge. Pity.
To: DugwayDuke
Being familiar with logic and being an environmental activist are mutually exclusive categories.
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
We use to shoot birds there by the gazillions fifty years ago. No way you could ever rid the island of them.
12
posted on
05/02/2002 7:14:49 PM PDT
by
cynicom
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Support for the U.S. has nothing to do with it. I live in Hawaii and lots of people object to bombing any islands. There's little enough land to begin with.
When the military takes land for a bombing range, they NEVER return it to civilian use. Case in point is the island of Kahoolawe. While the island was returned to the state by Bush Sr, the island can never be safely used because of the prohibitive cost of ordnance removal. The Navy says some unexploded bombs could be 10 meters deep.
The Army once leased a valley from a Hawaiian family during WWII to use as a firing range. When the lease was up and the Army returned the land, the Feds condemned the valley and walked away from it, saying it couldn't remove all the ordnance. Again, the cost was too prohibitive. The Feds left this family in the lurch. That's what they got for being patriotic.
If you think that we islanders are being unpatriotic, I would suggest that you give the Navy a bombing range somewhere near Martha's Vineyard and see how many people squawk.
13
posted on
05/02/2002 7:19:36 PM PDT
by
etcetera
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
The Navy is not above the law. Actually, the so-called rights of animals are not above the right of Americans to national security. These Clymers want to destroy our national security by destroying our military, which, like their hero x42, they hold in contempt.
14
posted on
05/02/2002 7:30:18 PM PDT
by
LouD
To: etcetera
Is Marthas Vineyard near the Kennedy compound, if so, that would be a great place to test ordinance.
15
posted on
05/02/2002 7:31:51 PM PDT
by
Husker24
To: etcetera
If you think that we islanders are being unpatriotic, I would suggest that you give the Navy a bombing range somewhere near Martha's Vineyard and see how many people squawk.Well, here is one American that will personally never squawk if they wanted to bomb that cesspool.
16
posted on
05/02/2002 8:05:23 PM PDT
by
Kush
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
An injunction to halt bombing and other military training on a tiny Pacific island could hinder Americas ability to defend itself and to prepare for war, a Navy spokesman said. The Navy ceased using Farallon de Medinilla in the U.S. Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands on Tuesday after U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan in Washington issued a 30-day injunction immediately halting all U.S. military activities.
- Impeach
- Remove from office
- Prosecute for treason
- Repeat as necessary
To: a_witness
Maybe we should just surrender to whoever while we can get good terms. But let's hang Sullivan first.
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
19
posted on
05/02/2002 10:16:26 PM PDT
by
Jean S
To: etcetera
If you think that we islanders are being unpatriotic, I would suggest that you give the Navy a bombing range somewhere near Martha's Vineyard and see how many people squawk. Not a bad idea that, shelling, bombing and straffing Martha's Vineyard. ;-) The thing is, this particular island is uninhabited.
As for being able to return a bombing or artillery range back to other uses, I'd say the fault must lie with Congress, since they must appropriate the necessary funds to clean the range up. I know it can be done. The family housing at Vandenberg AFB occupies in part the impact zone of the artillery and tank gunnery range from WW-II days when it was an Army armor training base. ( That information comes from having been on VAFB for six wonderfull weeks (NOT!) as an AFROTC cadet back in the early 70s.)
20
posted on
05/02/2002 10:45:25 PM PDT
by
El Gato
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson