Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

WooHoo! I can get 3 or 4 more SUV's to drive!
1 posted on 04/23/2002 4:48:26 PM PDT by visagoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: visagoth; shermy; seamole
Thanks this will be real upsetting to the Opecker Princes, their hand puppets in our senate like Da$$hole, Boxer, Kerry and other rat and Rino senators and of course to the Enviral Nazis who are the Opecker Princes best buddies in the world.

A lot of us have been saying that there is no shortage of oil. If there was a genuine shortage of oil, OPEC would not be a necessity of the Opecker Princes.

The day that we become independent of Opecker Oil is the day that Islamic Terrorism will start to shrivle up and die without the financing the terrorists get from the Opecker Princes thanks to our petro $'s.

Maybe there will be enough extra oil for the Axis of Whining Weasels , the Euro Trash countries. Then, they can lick our boots instead of the Opecker Princes's slippers.

Abort the Opecker Princes by aborting Opec!

2 posted on 04/23/2002 4:56:43 PM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: visagoth
We're almost out of oil! The population bomb is ticking! The sky is falling! THE SKY IS FALLING!!!

What's that? Oh. Never mind.

3 posted on 04/23/2002 4:58:15 PM PDT by inkling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: visagoth
Makes sense to imagine that natural oil and gas formation did not stop when the Drake well was drilled in Pennsylvania, that it is a continuing process.
4 posted on 04/23/2002 5:03:55 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: visagoth
It's even better than the article states, if Thomas Gold is correct.

See http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/tg21/ and then decide how many SUVs you should buy.

5 posted on 04/23/2002 5:06:19 PM PDT by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: visagoth
In the past, it was not suspected that oil fields can refill because it was assumed the oil formed in place, or nearby, rather than far below.

This is a key, and very false statement, but it's critical for those making this argument.

In almost every case, geologists and petrophysicists believe that oil is formed in shales or other source rock, and has migrated upward until it reaches a trap or seal which it cannot penetrate. That is almost NEVER where the oil itself was formed.

It leaks upward, just like an air bubble trying surface from underwater. Subtle things, like deep earthquakes, far too mild to be felt at the surface, can fracture rock and permit oil or gas to migrate upward from where it is currently trapped.

I wish I had a dollar for every well I've been involved with that tested rock where it's obvious oil used to be.

Some fields will refill, simply because a new migration path for oil has been opened. It does not imply in any way that the supply of oil is limitless.

7 posted on 04/23/2002 5:13:41 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: visagoth
Roberts added that natural seepage in places like the Gulf of Mexico "far exceeds anything that gets spilled” by oil tankers and other sources.

Could somebody kindly explain to me why natural oil spills that make the Exxon Valdez seem like chump change are apparently no big deal to the environment when done in the fish-rich, heavily populated Gulf of Mexico; yet, our nations' huge energy reserves in places like a few thousand acres in remotest-corner-of-the-earth ANWR can't be expoited because of "pollution" and environmental concerns?

Am I missing something here?

13 posted on 04/23/2002 5:34:51 PM PDT by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: visagoth;all
FYI--

The world has more oil not less

The Origin of Methane (and Oil) in the Crust of the Earth
Thomas Gold
U.S.G.S. Professional Paper 1570, The Future of Energy Gases, 1993

PETROLEUM RESERVES EVALUATED WITH MODERN PETROLEUM SCIENCE

Another Washington Post article here

16 posted on 04/23/2002 5:36:37 PM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: visagoth
So, just like Al Gore's sweat glands, some of these fields just keep on spewing fluids?
22 posted on 04/23/2002 5:51:31 PM PDT by isthisnickcool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: visagoth
So are more dinosaurs dying off to replenish the store of "fossil fuel"?
26 posted on 04/23/2002 6:24:06 PM PDT by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Doug from Upland will be interviewing David Schippers tonight on Radio FreeRepublic! This is a DON'T MISS SHOW!

Click here and listen while you FReep!

27 posted on 04/23/2002 6:24:30 PM PDT by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: visagoth
I still think that the Congress of the United States and Al Gore produce more gas than what exists from the Earth. If only there was a way to produce that political gas.
31 posted on 04/23/2002 6:42:42 PM PDT by Mel Gibson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: visagoth
The process which the article describes is referred to a "natural reservoir recharge" by petroleum geologists. Generally, the rate of recharge is much, much lower than the rate of withdrawal by production.

There was an interesting study I read a few years ago. The were many smallish oil fields discovered on Texas railroad lands in the decades prior to the 1930's. When the big discovery made in East Texas drove the prices down, many of these older, small fields were shut in. Some of them sat for decades. Others had sporatic re-development. In a few wells, there were recorded reservoir pressure measurements prior to long shut in intervals. When prices spiked in the late 1970's, a few of these wells were re-entered and re-logged (primarily looking for bypassed, or behind pipe reserves). But lo! and behold!, reservoir pressures were found to be much higher than when shut in, and some almost back to original (estimated) pressures. There were only a couple of possibilities, of which natural recharge was one.

I'm not a petroleum engineer, but the geolgical concepts behind recharge are sound. It is however, a dynamic equation. Time is the crucial factor. Also, proximity to an active petroleum system (in oil field lingo - how close you are to the "kitchen") is essential.

37 posted on 04/23/2002 10:14:27 PM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aruanan
(Black) Gold bump.
38 posted on 04/23/2002 10:23:44 PM PDT by a history buff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: visagoth
From the article:
It has long been known by geologists and oil industry workers that seeps exist. In Southern California, for example, there are seeps near Santa Barbara, at a geologic feature called Coal Oil Point."

This is in my "back yard." The offshore seeps at Coal Oil Point (so named because the early settlers thought the tars seeps were coming from underground coal beds) generally leak tarry oil at the rate of 100-150 barrels per day, depending on weather and temperature (1 barrel = 42 gallons). This area has been leaking at this rate for thousands of years. The seeps also emit a huge amount of natural gas. Back in the early 1980's, ARCO place two steel pyramids on the ocean floor over 20,000 sq feet of prolific gas seepage. The amount of gas collected was enough to supply the domestic gas consumption of a small city (25,000 people) - each and every day! This was the equivalent of several tons of reactive hydrocarbon pollutants. It kept the City of Santa Barbara in compliance with EPA requirements!

The environmentalists in the area still mislead the public by claiming that much of the natural seepage is coming from those "bad old offshore rigs." I have spent over 20 years of my career fighting such non-sense, but to little effect.

39 posted on 04/23/2002 10:27:09 PM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone
fyi
42 posted on 04/24/2002 2:38:24 AM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: visagoth
bump
80 posted on 07/03/2002 2:17:34 PM PDT by CPT Clay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Bump!
81 posted on 03/31/2005 7:55:28 AM PST by SunkenCiv (last updated my FreeRepublic profile on Friday, March 25, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson