[aculeus]

As a smart Freeper said yesterday (it's not yet picked up by the media) Moussari wants a "judge only" trial for one reason and one reason only. And it is not good.

Since judge's names -- unlike jurors' -- will be public knowledge terror threats could be made against the judge's family.

These moslem terrorists are the worst threat -- ever -- faced by our country.

[Sal]

Since judge's names -- unlike jurors' -- will be public knowledge terror threats could be made against the judge's family.

I still wish we knew who had the security "concession" where this scumbag will be tried. Remember that the Clintons/Janet Reno made sure that AKAL got contracts for security for several courts.

It's possible that was ONLY monetary payback for services already rendered IMO. It's also possible IMO that the Clintons had future plans that might require certain services rendered such as access to certain people and/or records (jurors' names?). Chances are IMO that IF it is AKAL, there will be a subsidiary with a different name IF certain specific type services are required...

Of course, it's also possible that the lucrative contracts were awarded because one of the AKAL guys gave SLick a cough drop when he really needed one. I just think we should know who's handling security.

[aristeides]

And for that reason these guys should be tried by military commissions, the membership of which would not be public knowledge.