Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fred Mertz; rdavis84; thinden; honway; aristeides; aculeus
Since judge's names -- unlike jurors' -- will be public knowledge terror threats could be made against the judge's family.

I still wish we knew who had the security "concession" where this scumbag will be tried. Remember that the Clintons/Janet Reno made sure that AKAL got contracts for security for several courts.

It's possible that was ONLY monetary payback for services already rendered IMO. It's also possible IMO that the Clintons had future plans that might require certain services rendered such as access to certain people and/or records (jurors' names?). Chances are IMO that IF it is AKAL, there will be a subsidiary with a different name IF certain specific type services are required...

Of course, it's also possible that the lucrative contracts were awarded because one of the AKAL guys gave SLick a cough drop when he really needed one. I just think we should know who's handling security.

19 posted on 04/23/2002 9:13:49 AM PDT by Sal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Sal; Wallaby; Nita Nupress; rdavis84; MizSterious; honway; Fred Mertz; Lion's Cub
I still wish we knew who had the security "concession" where this scumbag will be tried.

Remember that the Clintons/Janet Reno made sure that AKAL got contracts for security for several courts.

interesting point sal. maybe it's time to get what's left of the ol AKAL gang back together for this one?

24 posted on 04/23/2002 10:32:53 AM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson