I still wish we knew who had the security "concession" where this scumbag will be tried. Remember that the Clintons/Janet Reno made sure that AKAL got contracts for security for several courts.
It's possible that was ONLY monetary payback for services already rendered IMO. It's also possible IMO that the Clintons had future plans that might require certain services rendered such as access to certain people and/or records (jurors' names?). Chances are IMO that IF it is AKAL, there will be a subsidiary with a different name IF certain specific type services are required...
Of course, it's also possible that the lucrative contracts were awarded because one of the AKAL guys gave SLick a cough drop when he really needed one. I just think we should know who's handling security.
Remember that the Clintons/Janet Reno made sure that AKAL got contracts for security for several courts.
interesting point sal. maybe it's time to get what's left of the ol AKAL gang back together for this one?